用于评估慢性腰背痛功能干扰的图形疼痛干扰问卷的心理计量特性。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.029
{"title":"用于评估慢性腰背痛功能干扰的图形疼痛干扰问卷的心理计量特性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze the psychometric properties of the Pictorial Pain Interference Questionnaire (PPIQ) for evaluating functional interference in the population with chronic low back pain (CLBP).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Rehabilitation Unit in a hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Ninety-nine patients with CLBP.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Functional interference was assessed using PPIQ. The following data were also collected: sociodemographic data; pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]); physical functioning (30-s arm curl, 30-s chair stand [30CST], and timed Up and Go [TUG] tests), fitness (International Physical Activity Questionnaire); quality of life (Short-Form 12 Health Survey version 1 [SF-12v1]); sleep quality (Spanish-validated 12-item Medical Outcomes Study Sleep scale [12-MOS Sleep]); anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]); and social support (Duke-UNK Functional Social Support Questionnaire). Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, structural validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and discriminant and convergent validity using bivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-nine patients with CLBP were included (age [mean ± SD]: 54.37±12.44 y); women, 67.7%). The EFA extracted 2 factors: “physical function and “social and sleep,” which explained 57.75% of the variance. Excellent internal consistency was observed for the overall PPIQ score (Cronbach's α=0.866). Convergent validity was observed between the PPIQ and other functional measures (ρ: 0.52 and −0.47 for the TUG and 30CST, respectively; <em>P</em>&lt;.001) and with the following variables: physical and mental component summaries of the SF-12v1 (ρ: −0. 55 and −0.52, respectively (<em>P</em>&lt;.001); anxiety and depression of the HADS (ρ: 0.47 and 0.59, respectively (<em>P</em>&lt;.001); NPRS (ρ: 0.45; <em>P</em>&lt;.001); and index 9 of the 12-MOS Sleep scale (r: 0.49; <em>P</em>&lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PPIQ is a valid instrument with good psychometric properties for measuring functional interference in people with CLBP. This questionnaire appears to be a feasible alternative when language or communication barriers exist in CLBP population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"105 10","pages":"Pages 1870-1879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Pictorial Pain Interference Questionnaire for Assessing Functional Interference in Chronic Low Back Pain\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze the psychometric properties of the Pictorial Pain Interference Questionnaire (PPIQ) for evaluating functional interference in the population with chronic low back pain (CLBP).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Rehabilitation Unit in a hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Ninety-nine patients with CLBP.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Functional interference was assessed using PPIQ. The following data were also collected: sociodemographic data; pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]); physical functioning (30-s arm curl, 30-s chair stand [30CST], and timed Up and Go [TUG] tests), fitness (International Physical Activity Questionnaire); quality of life (Short-Form 12 Health Survey version 1 [SF-12v1]); sleep quality (Spanish-validated 12-item Medical Outcomes Study Sleep scale [12-MOS Sleep]); anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]); and social support (Duke-UNK Functional Social Support Questionnaire). Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, structural validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and discriminant and convergent validity using bivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-nine patients with CLBP were included (age [mean ± SD]: 54.37±12.44 y); women, 67.7%). The EFA extracted 2 factors: “physical function and “social and sleep,” which explained 57.75% of the variance. Excellent internal consistency was observed for the overall PPIQ score (Cronbach's α=0.866). Convergent validity was observed between the PPIQ and other functional measures (ρ: 0.52 and −0.47 for the TUG and 30CST, respectively; <em>P</em>&lt;.001) and with the following variables: physical and mental component summaries of the SF-12v1 (ρ: −0. 55 and −0.52, respectively (<em>P</em>&lt;.001); anxiety and depression of the HADS (ρ: 0.47 and 0.59, respectively (<em>P</em>&lt;.001); NPRS (ρ: 0.45; <em>P</em>&lt;.001); and index 9 of the 12-MOS Sleep scale (r: 0.49; <em>P</em>&lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PPIQ is a valid instrument with good psychometric properties for measuring functional interference in people with CLBP. This questionnaire appears to be a feasible alternative when language or communication barriers exist in CLBP population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"105 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1870-1879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324010499\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324010499","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析图画式疼痛干扰问卷(PPIQ)在评估慢性腰背痛(CLBP)患者功能干扰方面的心理计量特性:设计:横断面研究:地点:加的斯Puerta del Mar医院:干预措施:不适用:主要结果测量使用 PPIQ 评估功能干扰。还收集了以下数据社会人口学数据;疼痛强度(数字疼痛评分量表 [NPRS]);身体功能(30 秒卷臂 [30ACT]、30 秒椅站 [30CST] 和定时起立行走 [TUG] 测试);体能(国际体力活动问卷 [IPAQ]);生活质量(SF-12v1)、睡眠质量(12-MOS 睡眠)、焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑抑郁量表 [HADS])以及社会支持(杜克-UNK 功能性社会支持问卷 [DUKE-UNC-DSSI])。采用 Cronbach's alpha 分析内部一致性,采用探索性因素分析 (EFA) 分析结构效度,采用双变量分析分析判别效度和收敛效度:共纳入 99 名 CLBP 患者(平均年龄:54.37(标清:12.44);女性占 67.7%)。EFA 提取了两个因子:身体功能 "和 "社交与睡眠 "这两个因子解释了 57.75% 的方差。PPIQ 总分的内部一致性极佳(Cronbach's α=0.866)。在 PPIQ 和其他功能测量之间观察到了收敛有效性(rho:TUG 和 30CST 分别为 0.52 和 -0.47;P 结论:PPIQ 是一种有效的工具,在测量慢性阻塞性肺病患者的功能干扰方面具有良好的心理测量特性。当 CLBP 患者存在语言或交流障碍时,该问卷似乎是一种可行的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Properties of the Pictorial Pain Interference Questionnaire for Assessing Functional Interference in Chronic Low Back Pain

Objective

To analyze the psychometric properties of the Pictorial Pain Interference Questionnaire (PPIQ) for evaluating functional interference in the population with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Rehabilitation Unit in a hospital.

Participants

Ninety-nine patients with CLBP.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Functional interference was assessed using PPIQ. The following data were also collected: sociodemographic data; pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]); physical functioning (30-s arm curl, 30-s chair stand [30CST], and timed Up and Go [TUG] tests), fitness (International Physical Activity Questionnaire); quality of life (Short-Form 12 Health Survey version 1 [SF-12v1]); sleep quality (Spanish-validated 12-item Medical Outcomes Study Sleep scale [12-MOS Sleep]); anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]); and social support (Duke-UNK Functional Social Support Questionnaire). Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, structural validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and discriminant and convergent validity using bivariate analysis.

Results

Ninety-nine patients with CLBP were included (age [mean ± SD]: 54.37±12.44 y); women, 67.7%). The EFA extracted 2 factors: “physical function and “social and sleep,” which explained 57.75% of the variance. Excellent internal consistency was observed for the overall PPIQ score (Cronbach's α=0.866). Convergent validity was observed between the PPIQ and other functional measures (ρ: 0.52 and −0.47 for the TUG and 30CST, respectively; P<.001) and with the following variables: physical and mental component summaries of the SF-12v1 (ρ: −0. 55 and −0.52, respectively (P<.001); anxiety and depression of the HADS (ρ: 0.47 and 0.59, respectively (P<.001); NPRS (ρ: 0.45; P<.001); and index 9 of the 12-MOS Sleep scale (r: 0.49; P<.001).

Conclusions

The PPIQ is a valid instrument with good psychometric properties for measuring functional interference in people with CLBP. This questionnaire appears to be a feasible alternative when language or communication barriers exist in CLBP population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
Increased stiffness is evidenced in the deep but not superficial lumbar multifidus muscle in professional athletes with chronic low back pain. Effectiveness of a community-based exercise program for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness of micro-electrolysis associated with exercises versus exercises alone on pain intensity and disability in individuals with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: A randomized clinical trial. Longitudinal goal attainment with repeat injections of abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with lower limb spasticity: Results from a prospective observational study. Test-retest reliability and agreement of the work ability index - single item in persons with physical disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1