Ifran Saleh, Witantra Dhamar Hutami, Didik Librianto, Marcel Prasetyo, Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim, Andra Hendriarto, Erwin Ardian Noor, Aliyya Rifki
{"title":"开发新的评分系统以确定退行性腰椎管狭窄症是否存在不稳定性以及是否需要融合--雅加达不稳定性评分。","authors":"Ifran Saleh, Witantra Dhamar Hutami, Didik Librianto, Marcel Prasetyo, Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim, Andra Hendriarto, Erwin Ardian Noor, Aliyya Rifki","doi":"10.1177/21925682241262713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review, expert opinion and Delphi technique, and validity and reliability studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We developed Jakarta Instability Score (JIS) to identify spinal instability and the need of fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of systematic review to find predictors of spinal instability, expert opinion and modified Delphi technique to develop JIS, and validity and reliability studies of the newly developed JIS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 studies were included in the systematic reviews to obtain predictors of spinal instability. Through expert opinion and modified Delphi technique, JIS was developed and consisted of the clinical component (back pain), dynamic radiograph component (dynamic translation and angulation), and MRI component (facet joint effusion), each of the component would be scored, and the total scoring would be from 0 to 14. The final scoring would classify patients into three groups: stable group (score of 0 to 4) in which the fusion is not needed, potentially unstable group (score of 5 to 8) in which the decision of fusion is based on surgeon's clinical judgment, and unstable group (score of 9 to 14) in which the fusion is needed. Final step of study concluded that this JIS had a high validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly developed JIS was a valid and reliable scoring system that could help to identify the presence of instability in LSS and can be used as a guideline to decide whether spinal fusion will be needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of New Scoring System to Define the Presence of Instability and the Need of Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - Jakarta Instability Score.\",\"authors\":\"Ifran Saleh, Witantra Dhamar Hutami, Didik Librianto, Marcel Prasetyo, Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim, Andra Hendriarto, Erwin Ardian Noor, Aliyya Rifki\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241262713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review, expert opinion and Delphi technique, and validity and reliability studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We developed Jakarta Instability Score (JIS) to identify spinal instability and the need of fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of systematic review to find predictors of spinal instability, expert opinion and modified Delphi technique to develop JIS, and validity and reliability studies of the newly developed JIS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 studies were included in the systematic reviews to obtain predictors of spinal instability. Through expert opinion and modified Delphi technique, JIS was developed and consisted of the clinical component (back pain), dynamic radiograph component (dynamic translation and angulation), and MRI component (facet joint effusion), each of the component would be scored, and the total scoring would be from 0 to 14. The final scoring would classify patients into three groups: stable group (score of 0 to 4) in which the fusion is not needed, potentially unstable group (score of 5 to 8) in which the decision of fusion is based on surgeon's clinical judgment, and unstable group (score of 9 to 14) in which the fusion is needed. Final step of study concluded that this JIS had a high validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly developed JIS was a valid and reliable scoring system that could help to identify the presence of instability in LSS and can be used as a guideline to decide whether spinal fusion will be needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"241-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241262713\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241262713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:系统综述、专家意见和德尔菲技术、有效性和可靠性研究:我们制定了雅加达不稳定性评分(JIS),以确定退行性腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的脊柱不稳定性和融合的必要性:本研究包括系统性综述以寻找脊柱不稳定性的预测因素、专家意见和改良德尔菲技术以开发 JIS,以及对新开发的 JIS 进行有效性和可靠性研究:结果:共有 54 项研究被纳入系统综述,以获得脊柱不稳定性的预测因素。通过专家意见和修改后的德尔菲技术,JIS 被开发出来,由临床部分(背痛)、动态 X 光片部分(动态平移和成角)和 MRI 部分(面关节积液)组成,每个部分都将被评分,总分从 0 到 14 分不等。最后的评分将患者分为三组:稳定组(0 至 4 分),不需要融合;潜在不稳定组(5 至 8 分),根据外科医生的临床判断决定是否融合;不稳定组(9 至 14 分),需要融合。研究最后得出结论,该 JIS 具有很高的有效性和可靠性:新开发的 JIS 是一种有效、可靠的评分系统,有助于识别 LSS 中是否存在不稳定性,并可作为决定是否需要脊柱融合术的指南。
The Development of New Scoring System to Define the Presence of Instability and the Need of Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis - Jakarta Instability Score.
Study design: Systematic review, expert opinion and Delphi technique, and validity and reliability studies.
Objective: We developed Jakarta Instability Score (JIS) to identify spinal instability and the need of fusion in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Methods: This study consisted of systematic review to find predictors of spinal instability, expert opinion and modified Delphi technique to develop JIS, and validity and reliability studies of the newly developed JIS.
Results: A total of 54 studies were included in the systematic reviews to obtain predictors of spinal instability. Through expert opinion and modified Delphi technique, JIS was developed and consisted of the clinical component (back pain), dynamic radiograph component (dynamic translation and angulation), and MRI component (facet joint effusion), each of the component would be scored, and the total scoring would be from 0 to 14. The final scoring would classify patients into three groups: stable group (score of 0 to 4) in which the fusion is not needed, potentially unstable group (score of 5 to 8) in which the decision of fusion is based on surgeon's clinical judgment, and unstable group (score of 9 to 14) in which the fusion is needed. Final step of study concluded that this JIS had a high validity and reliability.
Conclusion: The newly developed JIS was a valid and reliable scoring system that could help to identify the presence of instability in LSS and can be used as a guideline to decide whether spinal fusion will be needed.
期刊介绍:
Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).