德国无并发症尿路感染的治疗模式和指南遵守情况:回顾性队列研究。

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s40121-024-00973-8
Axel Krinner, Michael Schultze, Alen Marijam, Marc Pignot, Nils Kossack, Fanny S Mitrani-Gold, Ashish V Joshi
{"title":"德国无并发症尿路感染的治疗模式和指南遵守情况:回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Axel Krinner, Michael Schultze, Alen Marijam, Marc Pignot, Nils Kossack, Fanny S Mitrani-Gold, Ashish V Joshi","doi":"10.1007/s40121-024-00973-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding antibiotic prescribing for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) could help to optimize management. However, data on uUTI treatment patterns in the European Union are scarce. We used real-world data to evaluate adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines for femalepatients with uUTI in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used anonymized German statutory health insurance claims data from the Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung from January 2013 to December 2019. Patients were female, aged ≥ 12 years, with an index uUTI diagnosis. Patient characteristics and treating physician specialties were examined overall and in sub-cohorts for recommended/non-recommended treatment (based on initial therapy adherence to German uUTI treatment guidelines) and optimal/sub-optimal outcome (based on a prescription of different antibiotics or a urinary tract infection-related episode).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 144,645 uUTI cases in 124,971 patients were analyzed; 51,230 (35.4%) and 93,415 (64.6%) cases were assigned to the recommended/non-recommended treatment sub-cohorts, respectively. Clinically meaningful differences in age and comorbidities were observed between these sub-cohorts. Most cases had an optimal outcome (n = 122,823; 84.9%); of these, a higher proportion received antibiotics that were recommended but not as first-choice versus first-choice therapies as their initial treatment (58.6% vs. 35.3%). In the sub-optimal outcome cohort, 49.1% received antibiotics that were recommended but not as first-choice and 41.1% received first-choice therapies as their initial treatment. Most uUTIs were treated by general practitioners (GPs; 82.3%), followed by gynecologists (13.3%), and urologists (6.8%). Notably, 64.5% of initial therapy prescriptions filled by gynecologists and 32.1% by GPs were first-choice antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high proportion of prescribed treatments for the initial uUTI episode were not recommended by German uUTI guidelines as first-choice antibiotics. Prescribing adherence varied by physician specialty; specialists showed greater adherence to treatment guidelines versus GPs. This study provides a novel and multi-dimensional picture of uUTI treatment in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1487-1500"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Patterns and Adherence to Guidelines for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Germany: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Axel Krinner, Michael Schultze, Alen Marijam, Marc Pignot, Nils Kossack, Fanny S Mitrani-Gold, Ashish V Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40121-024-00973-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding antibiotic prescribing for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) could help to optimize management. However, data on uUTI treatment patterns in the European Union are scarce. We used real-world data to evaluate adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines for femalepatients with uUTI in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used anonymized German statutory health insurance claims data from the Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung from January 2013 to December 2019. Patients were female, aged ≥ 12 years, with an index uUTI diagnosis. Patient characteristics and treating physician specialties were examined overall and in sub-cohorts for recommended/non-recommended treatment (based on initial therapy adherence to German uUTI treatment guidelines) and optimal/sub-optimal outcome (based on a prescription of different antibiotics or a urinary tract infection-related episode).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 144,645 uUTI cases in 124,971 patients were analyzed; 51,230 (35.4%) and 93,415 (64.6%) cases were assigned to the recommended/non-recommended treatment sub-cohorts, respectively. Clinically meaningful differences in age and comorbidities were observed between these sub-cohorts. Most cases had an optimal outcome (n = 122,823; 84.9%); of these, a higher proportion received antibiotics that were recommended but not as first-choice versus first-choice therapies as their initial treatment (58.6% vs. 35.3%). In the sub-optimal outcome cohort, 49.1% received antibiotics that were recommended but not as first-choice and 41.1% received first-choice therapies as their initial treatment. Most uUTIs were treated by general practitioners (GPs; 82.3%), followed by gynecologists (13.3%), and urologists (6.8%). Notably, 64.5% of initial therapy prescriptions filled by gynecologists and 32.1% by GPs were first-choice antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high proportion of prescribed treatments for the initial uUTI episode were not recommended by German uUTI guidelines as first-choice antibiotics. Prescribing adherence varied by physician specialty; specialists showed greater adherence to treatment guidelines versus GPs. This study provides a novel and multi-dimensional picture of uUTI treatment in Germany.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1487-1500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219654/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-00973-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-00973-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:了解无并发症尿路感染(UTI)的抗生素处方有助于优化治疗。然而,有关欧盟尿路感染治疗模式的数据却很少。我们利用真实世界的数据评估了德国女性尿路感染患者对抗生素处方指南的遵守情况:这项回顾性队列研究使用了 Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间的匿名德国法定医疗保险理赔数据。患者为女性,年龄≥ 12 岁,诊断为尿路感染。对患者总体特征和主治医生专业进行了研究,并对推荐/非推荐治疗(基于初始治疗是否符合德国尿路感染治疗指南)和最佳/次最佳治疗结果(基于不同抗生素处方或尿路感染相关病例)进行了子队列研究:共对124971名患者的144645例尿路感染病例进行了分析,其中51230例(35.4%)和93415例(64.6%)分别被归入推荐/非推荐治疗亚组。这些亚组之间在年龄和合并症方面存在有临床意义的差异。大多数病例都获得了最佳治疗结果(n = 122,823; 84.9%);其中,接受推荐但非首选抗生素与首选疗法作为初始治疗的比例较高(58.6% vs. 35.3%)。在疗效不达标的组群中,49.1%的患者在初始治疗中使用了推荐但非首选的抗生素,41.1%的患者使用了首选疗法。大多数尿路感染是由全科医生(GPs,82.3%)治疗的,其次是妇科医生(13.3%)和泌尿科医生(6.8%)。值得注意的是,在妇科医生和全科医生开出的初始治疗处方中,分别有 64.5% 和 32.1% 是首选抗生素:结论:德国尿路感染指南并未建议将大部分尿路感染初期治疗处方作为首选抗生素。不同专业的医生开具处方的依从性各不相同;专科医生与全科医生相比,对治疗指南的依从性更高。这项研究提供了德国尿路感染治疗的多维度新情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment Patterns and Adherence to Guidelines for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Germany: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Understanding antibiotic prescribing for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) could help to optimize management. However, data on uUTI treatment patterns in the European Union are scarce. We used real-world data to evaluate adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines for femalepatients with uUTI in Germany.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used anonymized German statutory health insurance claims data from the Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung from January 2013 to December 2019. Patients were female, aged ≥ 12 years, with an index uUTI diagnosis. Patient characteristics and treating physician specialties were examined overall and in sub-cohorts for recommended/non-recommended treatment (based on initial therapy adherence to German uUTI treatment guidelines) and optimal/sub-optimal outcome (based on a prescription of different antibiotics or a urinary tract infection-related episode).

Results: Overall, 144,645 uUTI cases in 124,971 patients were analyzed; 51,230 (35.4%) and 93,415 (64.6%) cases were assigned to the recommended/non-recommended treatment sub-cohorts, respectively. Clinically meaningful differences in age and comorbidities were observed between these sub-cohorts. Most cases had an optimal outcome (n = 122,823; 84.9%); of these, a higher proportion received antibiotics that were recommended but not as first-choice versus first-choice therapies as their initial treatment (58.6% vs. 35.3%). In the sub-optimal outcome cohort, 49.1% received antibiotics that were recommended but not as first-choice and 41.1% received first-choice therapies as their initial treatment. Most uUTIs were treated by general practitioners (GPs; 82.3%), followed by gynecologists (13.3%), and urologists (6.8%). Notably, 64.5% of initial therapy prescriptions filled by gynecologists and 32.1% by GPs were first-choice antibiotics.

Conclusion: A high proportion of prescribed treatments for the initial uUTI episode were not recommended by German uUTI guidelines as first-choice antibiotics. Prescribing adherence varied by physician specialty; specialists showed greater adherence to treatment guidelines versus GPs. This study provides a novel and multi-dimensional picture of uUTI treatment in Germany.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Population Pharmacokinetics of Bepirovirsen in Healthy Participants and Participants with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Results from Phase 1, 2a, and 2b Studies. Expanding Treatment Opportunities: Reviewing the Current State of Injectable Antiretrovirals for Treatment of HIV. Omadacycline for Diverse Infections in China: A Real-World Analysis of Efficacy and Safety. Effectiveness, Safety, and Patterns of Real-World Isavuconazole Use in Europe (2015-2019). Intravenous Versus Oral Omadacycline or Linezolid for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Infections: A post hoc Analysis of the OASIS Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1