不同腭部形态对无牙上颌骨口内扫描准确性的影响:三维分析。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of prosthodontic research Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00175
Roberto Sorrentino, Gennaro Ruggiero, Renato Leone, Maria Irene Di Mauro, Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco, Tim Joda, Lucio Lo Russo, Fernando Zarone
{"title":"不同腭部形态对无牙上颌骨口内扫描准确性的影响:三维分析。","authors":"Roberto Sorrentino, Gennaro Ruggiero, Renato Leone, Maria Irene Di Mauro, Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco, Tim Joda, Lucio Lo Russo, Fernando Zarone","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the influence of different palatal morphologies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning (TRIOS 4) of edentulous maxillae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six typodonts were fabricated for different palatal morphologies with flat (F), medium (M), and deep (D) palates, with palatal wrinkles (W), or smooth palates (S), resulting in six groups: WF, WM, WD and SF, SM, SD. Ten scans were performed for each group; standard tessellation language files obtained were imported into a software to measure trueness and precision in micrometer. Trueness was calculated as the mean of the standard deviation values obtained by superimposing each scan onto the reference scan. Precision was achieved by overlapping each scan with that with the best trueness in the group. Descriptive and post-hoc analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values for trueness were as follows: WM=48.7±4.7, WD=161.7±18.4, WF=85.9±16, SM=48.1±2.4, SD=349.9±8.8, and SF=349.1±25.5. The precision values were as follows: WM=46.7±7.3, WD=46.9±9, WF=48.9±6.7, SM=46±2.7, SD=105.9±17.4, SF=72.6±10.8. Significant differences were observed for trueness between SM and SD (P < 0.001), SM and SF (P < 0.001), and WF and SF (P = 0.003); whereas for precision, significant differences were reported between WD and SD (P = 0.015). Regarding trueness and precision, no difference was found between WM and SM (P = 1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medium palatal depth showed the best accuracy. The mean accuracy values were within the clinical acceptability thresholds for all palatal morphologies. The presence of rugae improved the precision of deeper palates and the trueness of flat palates. No differences were observed in the medium palates with or without rugae.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of different palatal morphologies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of the edentulous maxilla: A three-dimensional analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Sorrentino, Gennaro Ruggiero, Renato Leone, Maria Irene Di Mauro, Edoardo Ferrari Cagidiaco, Tim Joda, Lucio Lo Russo, Fernando Zarone\",\"doi\":\"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the influence of different palatal morphologies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning (TRIOS 4) of edentulous maxillae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six typodonts were fabricated for different palatal morphologies with flat (F), medium (M), and deep (D) palates, with palatal wrinkles (W), or smooth palates (S), resulting in six groups: WF, WM, WD and SF, SM, SD. Ten scans were performed for each group; standard tessellation language files obtained were imported into a software to measure trueness and precision in micrometer. Trueness was calculated as the mean of the standard deviation values obtained by superimposing each scan onto the reference scan. Precision was achieved by overlapping each scan with that with the best trueness in the group. Descriptive and post-hoc analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean values for trueness were as follows: WM=48.7±4.7, WD=161.7±18.4, WF=85.9±16, SM=48.1±2.4, SD=349.9±8.8, and SF=349.1±25.5. The precision values were as follows: WM=46.7±7.3, WD=46.9±9, WF=48.9±6.7, SM=46±2.7, SD=105.9±17.4, SF=72.6±10.8. Significant differences were observed for trueness between SM and SD (P < 0.001), SM and SF (P < 0.001), and WF and SF (P = 0.003); whereas for precision, significant differences were reported between WD and SD (P = 0.015). Regarding trueness and precision, no difference was found between WM and SM (P = 1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medium palatal depth showed the best accuracy. The mean accuracy values were within the clinical acceptability thresholds for all palatal morphologies. The presence of rugae improved the precision of deeper palates and the trueness of flat palates. No differences were observed in the medium palates with or without rugae.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of prosthodontic research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of prosthodontic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00175\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究调查了不同腭部形态对无牙上颌骨口内扫描(TRIOS 4)准确性的影响:针对不同的腭部形态制作了六种类型的牙托,分别为平腭(F)、中腭(M)和深腭(D)、腭皱(W)或光滑腭(S),共分为六组:WF、WM、WD 和 SF、SM、SD。每组进行十次扫描;将获得的标准细分语言文件导入软件,以微米为单位测量真实度和精度。真实度是通过将每次扫描叠加到参考扫描上获得的标准偏差值的平均值来计算的。精确度则是通过将每次扫描与组内真实度最好的扫描重叠来实现的。进行了描述性分析和事后分析:真实度的平均值如下WM=48.7±4.7,WD=161.7±18.4,WF=85.9±16,SM=48.1±2.4,SD=349.9±8.8,SF=349.1±25.5。精确度值如下WM=46.7±7.3,WD=46.9±9,WF=48.9±6.7,SM=46±2.7,SD=105.9±17.4,SF=72.6±10.8。在真实度方面,SM 和 SD(P < 0.001)、SM 和 SF(P < 0.001)以及 WF 和 SF(P = 0.003)之间存在显著差异;而在精确度方面,WD 和 SD(P = 0.015)之间存在显著差异。在真实度和精确度方面,WM 和 SM 之间没有差异(P = 1.0):结论:中等腭深显示出最佳的准确性。所有腭部形态的平均准确度值都在临床可接受阈值之内。褶皱的存在提高了较深腭部的精确度和扁平腭部的真实度。有无褶皱的中等腭部没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of different palatal morphologies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of the edentulous maxilla: A three-dimensional analysis.

Purpose: This study investigated the influence of different palatal morphologies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning (TRIOS 4) of edentulous maxillae.

Methods: Six typodonts were fabricated for different palatal morphologies with flat (F), medium (M), and deep (D) palates, with palatal wrinkles (W), or smooth palates (S), resulting in six groups: WF, WM, WD and SF, SM, SD. Ten scans were performed for each group; standard tessellation language files obtained were imported into a software to measure trueness and precision in micrometer. Trueness was calculated as the mean of the standard deviation values obtained by superimposing each scan onto the reference scan. Precision was achieved by overlapping each scan with that with the best trueness in the group. Descriptive and post-hoc analyses were conducted.

Results: The mean values for trueness were as follows: WM=48.7±4.7, WD=161.7±18.4, WF=85.9±16, SM=48.1±2.4, SD=349.9±8.8, and SF=349.1±25.5. The precision values were as follows: WM=46.7±7.3, WD=46.9±9, WF=48.9±6.7, SM=46±2.7, SD=105.9±17.4, SF=72.6±10.8. Significant differences were observed for trueness between SM and SD (P < 0.001), SM and SF (P < 0.001), and WF and SF (P = 0.003); whereas for precision, significant differences were reported between WD and SD (P = 0.015). Regarding trueness and precision, no difference was found between WM and SM (P = 1.0).

Conclusions: Medium palatal depth showed the best accuracy. The mean accuracy values were within the clinical acceptability thresholds for all palatal morphologies. The presence of rugae improved the precision of deeper palates and the trueness of flat palates. No differences were observed in the medium palates with or without rugae.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of prosthodontic research
Journal of prosthodontic research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication. Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function. The most-targeted topics: 1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics 2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics 3) Oral Implantology 4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology) 5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism) 6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) 7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry 8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation 9) Digital Dentistry Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions. Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of conventional versus additive cast-fabrication in implant prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies Efficacy of initial conservative treatment options for temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Effectiveness of keratinized mucosa augmentation procedures around dental implants based on risk assessment: A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Evaluation of hypermobile teeth deviation during impression taking in a partially edentulous dental arch: An in vitro study comparing digital and conventional impression techniques. Single-cell analysis of peri-implant gingival tissue to assess implant biocompatibility and immune response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1