急性髓性白血病老年患者化疗后的居家时间。

IF 28.4 1区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Jama Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1823
Daniel R Richardson, Xi Zhou, Katherine Reeder-Hayes, Christopher E Jensen, Jessica Islam, Kah Poh Loh, Arjun Gupta, Ethan Basch, Antonia V Bennett, John F P Bridges, Stephanie B Wheeler, William A Wood, Christopher D Baggett, Jennifer L Lund
{"title":"急性髓性白血病老年患者化疗后的居家时间。","authors":"Daniel R Richardson, Xi Zhou, Katherine Reeder-Hayes, Christopher E Jensen, Jessica Islam, Kah Poh Loh, Arjun Gupta, Ethan Basch, Antonia V Bennett, John F P Bridges, Stephanie B Wheeler, William A Wood, Christopher D Baggett, Jennifer L Lund","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) recognize days spent at home (home time) vs in a hospital or nursing facility as an important factor in treatment decision making. No study has adequately described home time among older adults with AML.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe home time among older adults with AML (aged ≥66 years) and compare home time between 2 common treatments: anthracycline-based chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents (HMAs).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cohort of adults aged 66 years or older with a new diagnosis of AML from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database in 2004 to 2016 was identified. Individuals were stratified into anthracycline-based therapy, HMAs, or chemotherapy, not otherwise specified (NOS) using claims.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was home time, quantified by subtracting the total number of person-days spent in hospitals and nursing facilities from the number of person-days survived and dividing by total person-days. A weighted multinomial regression model with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate adjusted home time was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 7946 patients with AML: 2824 (35.5%) received anthracyclines, 2542 (32.0%) HMAs, and 2580 (32.5%) were classified as chemotherapy, NOS. Median (IQR) survival was 11.0 (5.0-27.0) months for those receiving anthracyclines and 8.0 (3.0-17.0) months for those receiving HMAs. Adjusted home time for all patients in the first year was 52.4%. Home time was highest among patients receiving HMAs (60.8%) followed by those receiving anthracyclines (51.9%). Despite having a shorter median survival, patients receiving HMAs had more total days at home and 33 more days at home in the first year on average than patients receiving anthracyclines (222 vs 189).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This retrospective study of older adults with AML using SEER-Medicare data and propensity score weighting suggests that the additional survival afforded by receiving anthracycline-based therapy was entirely offset by admission to the hospital or to nursing facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":28.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home Time Among Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Following Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel R Richardson, Xi Zhou, Katherine Reeder-Hayes, Christopher E Jensen, Jessica Islam, Kah Poh Loh, Arjun Gupta, Ethan Basch, Antonia V Bennett, John F P Bridges, Stephanie B Wheeler, William A Wood, Christopher D Baggett, Jennifer L Lund\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) recognize days spent at home (home time) vs in a hospital or nursing facility as an important factor in treatment decision making. No study has adequately described home time among older adults with AML.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe home time among older adults with AML (aged ≥66 years) and compare home time between 2 common treatments: anthracycline-based chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents (HMAs).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cohort of adults aged 66 years or older with a new diagnosis of AML from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database in 2004 to 2016 was identified. Individuals were stratified into anthracycline-based therapy, HMAs, or chemotherapy, not otherwise specified (NOS) using claims.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was home time, quantified by subtracting the total number of person-days spent in hospitals and nursing facilities from the number of person-days survived and dividing by total person-days. A weighted multinomial regression model with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate adjusted home time was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 7946 patients with AML: 2824 (35.5%) received anthracyclines, 2542 (32.0%) HMAs, and 2580 (32.5%) were classified as chemotherapy, NOS. Median (IQR) survival was 11.0 (5.0-27.0) months for those receiving anthracyclines and 8.0 (3.0-17.0) months for those receiving HMAs. Adjusted home time for all patients in the first year was 52.4%. Home time was highest among patients receiving HMAs (60.8%) followed by those receiving anthracyclines (51.9%). Despite having a shorter median survival, patients receiving HMAs had more total days at home and 33 more days at home in the first year on average than patients receiving anthracyclines (222 vs 189).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This retrospective study of older adults with AML using SEER-Medicare data and propensity score weighting suggests that the additional survival afforded by receiving anthracycline-based therapy was entirely offset by admission to the hospital or to nursing facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jama Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":28.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jama Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1823\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1823","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:急性髓性白血病(AML)患者认为,在家(在家时间)与在医院或护理机构度过的天数是治疗决策中的一个重要因素。目前还没有研究对患有急性髓性白血病的老年人的居家时间进行充分描述:目的:描述患有急性髓细胞性白血病的老年人(年龄≥66岁)的居家时间,并比较两种常见治疗方法:蒽环类化疗和低甲基化药物(HMAs)的居家时间:从2004年至2016年的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医保链接数据库中确定了66岁或以上新诊断为急性髓细胞性白血病的成人队列。根据索赔情况将患者分为基于蒽环类药物的治疗、HMAs或化疗,未作其他说明(NOS):主要结果和测量方法:主要结果是回家时间,量化方法是将在医院和护理机构度过的总天数从存活天数中减去,再除以总天数。该研究采用了一个加权多项式回归模型,用稳定的逆治疗概率加权来估算调整后的居家时间:结果:队列中包括 7946 名急性髓细胞白血病患者:2824例(35.5%)接受了蒽环类药物治疗,2542例(32.0%)接受了HMAs治疗,2580例(32.5%)被归类为NOS化疗。接受蒽环类药物治疗的患者生存期中位数(IQR)为 11.0(5.0-27.0)个月,接受 HMAs 治疗的患者生存期中位数(IQR)为 8.0(3.0-17.0)个月。所有患者第一年的调整后居家时间为 52.4%。接受 HMAs 治疗的患者居家时间最长(60.8%),其次是接受蒽环类药物治疗的患者(51.9%)。尽管中位生存期较短,但与接受蒽环类药物治疗的患者相比(222 对 189),接受 HMAs 治疗的患者在家的总天数较多,第一年在家的天数平均多 33 天:这项利用 SEER-Medicare 数据和倾向得分加权法对患有急性髓细胞性白血病的老年人进行的回顾性研究表明,接受蒽环类药物治疗所带来的额外生存期完全被入院或入住护理机构所抵消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Home Time Among Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Following Chemotherapy.

Importance: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) recognize days spent at home (home time) vs in a hospital or nursing facility as an important factor in treatment decision making. No study has adequately described home time among older adults with AML.

Objective: To describe home time among older adults with AML (aged ≥66 years) and compare home time between 2 common treatments: anthracycline-based chemotherapy and hypomethylating agents (HMAs).

Design, setting, and participants: A cohort of adults aged 66 years or older with a new diagnosis of AML from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database in 2004 to 2016 was identified. Individuals were stratified into anthracycline-based therapy, HMAs, or chemotherapy, not otherwise specified (NOS) using claims.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was home time, quantified by subtracting the total number of person-days spent in hospitals and nursing facilities from the number of person-days survived and dividing by total person-days. A weighted multinomial regression model with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate adjusted home time was used.

Results: The cohort included 7946 patients with AML: 2824 (35.5%) received anthracyclines, 2542 (32.0%) HMAs, and 2580 (32.5%) were classified as chemotherapy, NOS. Median (IQR) survival was 11.0 (5.0-27.0) months for those receiving anthracyclines and 8.0 (3.0-17.0) months for those receiving HMAs. Adjusted home time for all patients in the first year was 52.4%. Home time was highest among patients receiving HMAs (60.8%) followed by those receiving anthracyclines (51.9%). Despite having a shorter median survival, patients receiving HMAs had more total days at home and 33 more days at home in the first year on average than patients receiving anthracyclines (222 vs 189).

Conclusions and relevance: This retrospective study of older adults with AML using SEER-Medicare data and propensity score weighting suggests that the additional survival afforded by receiving anthracycline-based therapy was entirely offset by admission to the hospital or to nursing facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jama Oncology
Jama Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
37.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science. Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers. We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.
期刊最新文献
Effects of the Oncology Industrial Complex on Academic Cancer Centers. Efficacy of Adding Veliparib to Temozolomide for Patients With MGMT-Methylated Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Errors in Figure 3. Expanding Clinical Trial Accessibility in the Digital Era With Telemedicine. Expanding Clinical Trial Accessibility in the Digital Era With Telemedicine-Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1