个人对复杂项目的看法:了解项目团队和利益相关者心智模式的窗口

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102603
David C. Hackman , Julien Pollack , Marzena Baker
{"title":"个人对复杂项目的看法:了解项目团队和利益相关者心智模式的窗口","authors":"David C. Hackman ,&nbsp;Julien Pollack ,&nbsp;Marzena Baker","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the current state of a complex project is challenging but essential for project teams to make effective management decisions. This research explores whether the indirect elicitation and comparison of mental models measured through individual level perceptions can encourage project team double loop learning about a complex project to inform management decisions. The best-worst scaling object case method was applied at the individual level to measure system-wide perceptions of two case study projects, demonstrating its efficacy in capturing team and stakeholder perceptions, and measuring how these change over time. Analysis of the case studies showed that highlighting the differences in mental models uncovered using the best-worst scaling object case method at the individual level can facilitate double loop learning and prompt management decisions about complex projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"42 4","pages":"Article 102603"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786324000450/pdfft?md5=f329c92323ec8a562631cd0bfd22ce61&pid=1-s2.0-S0263786324000450-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual perceptions of complex projects: A window into project team and stakeholder mental models\",\"authors\":\"David C. Hackman ,&nbsp;Julien Pollack ,&nbsp;Marzena Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding the current state of a complex project is challenging but essential for project teams to make effective management decisions. This research explores whether the indirect elicitation and comparison of mental models measured through individual level perceptions can encourage project team double loop learning about a complex project to inform management decisions. The best-worst scaling object case method was applied at the individual level to measure system-wide perceptions of two case study projects, demonstrating its efficacy in capturing team and stakeholder perceptions, and measuring how these change over time. Analysis of the case studies showed that highlighting the differences in mental models uncovered using the best-worst scaling object case method at the individual level can facilitate double loop learning and prompt management decisions about complex projects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Project Management\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102603\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786324000450/pdfft?md5=f329c92323ec8a562631cd0bfd22ce61&pid=1-s2.0-S0263786324000450-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Project Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786324000450\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786324000450","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解复杂项目的现状具有挑战性,但对项目团队做出有效的管理决策至关重要。本研究探讨了通过个人层面的感知对心智模型进行间接诱导和比较,是否能够鼓励项目团队对复杂项目进行双环学习,从而为管理决策提供依据。最佳-最差缩放对象案例法被应用于个体层面,以衡量两个案例研究项目的全系统感知,证明了该方法在捕捉团队和利益相关者的感知以及衡量这些感知如何随时间变化方面的有效性。对案例研究的分析表明,在个人层面使用最佳-最差缩放对象案例法来强调所发现的心智模式差异,可以促进双环学习,并促使管理层对复杂项目做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual perceptions of complex projects: A window into project team and stakeholder mental models

Understanding the current state of a complex project is challenging but essential for project teams to make effective management decisions. This research explores whether the indirect elicitation and comparison of mental models measured through individual level perceptions can encourage project team double loop learning about a complex project to inform management decisions. The best-worst scaling object case method was applied at the individual level to measure system-wide perceptions of two case study projects, demonstrating its efficacy in capturing team and stakeholder perceptions, and measuring how these change over time. Analysis of the case studies showed that highlighting the differences in mental models uncovered using the best-worst scaling object case method at the individual level can facilitate double loop learning and prompt management decisions about complex projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Empowering project team to perform: Directive and facilitative antecedents When project outcomes matter: Organizational integration in managing long-term target benefits Governance mechanisms and practices in project-based interorganisational collaboration for innovation Lifecycles, processes, and practices in strategic projects and programs Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1