617 名偏头痛患者对急性和预防性偏头痛治疗属性及临床试验终点的偏好和看法。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1080/14737175.2024.2365312
Michail Vikelis, Dimitrios Rikos, Andreas A Argyriou, Pinelopi Papachristou, Dimitrios Rallis, Theodoros Karapanayiotides, Andreas Galanopoulos, Konstantinos Spingos, Nikolaos Dimisianos, Emmanouil Giakoumakis, Periklis Zavridis, Konstantinos Notas, George S Vlachos, Panagiotis Soldatos, Konstantinos Bilias, Georgia Xiromerisiou, Jobst Rudolf, Emmanouil V Dermitzakis, Alan M Rapoport
{"title":"617 名偏头痛患者对急性和预防性偏头痛治疗属性及临床试验终点的偏好和看法。","authors":"Michail Vikelis, Dimitrios Rikos, Andreas A Argyriou, Pinelopi Papachristou, Dimitrios Rallis, Theodoros Karapanayiotides, Andreas Galanopoulos, Konstantinos Spingos, Nikolaos Dimisianos, Emmanouil Giakoumakis, Periklis Zavridis, Konstantinos Notas, George S Vlachos, Panagiotis Soldatos, Konstantinos Bilias, Georgia Xiromerisiou, Jobst Rudolf, Emmanouil V Dermitzakis, Alan M Rapoport","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2365312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To identify the preferences and perceptions of migraine patients for acute and preventive treatment options and to investigate which treatment outcomes are the most important.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>The authors performed a choice-format survey in a cohort of migraine patients from Greece and Cyprus. A self-administered questionnaire developed in collaboration with the Greek Society of Migraine Patients was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were collected from 617 migraine patients. Efficacy was preferred over safety as the single most important parameter, both in acute and preventive treatment. When analyzing single outcomes, patients prioritized a complete pain remission at 1-hour post-dose for acute therapies. Regarding migraine prevention, a 75% reduction in frequency, intensity of pain, accompanying symptoms and acute medication intake were considered as most important. Conversely, outcomes routinely used in clinical trials, namely complete or partial pain remission at 2-hours post-dose for acute treatment and 50% or 30% reduction in migraine frequency for prevention, were not deemed particularly relevant. Tablet formulation was mostly preferred, both in acute and preventive treatment. Conclusion: Listening to patients' needs may add a piece of the puzzle that is generally missing in clinical practice and often explains the lack of adherence in both acute and preventative anti-migraine therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"815-826"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences and perceptions of 617 migraine patients on acute and preventive migraine treatment attributes and clinical trial endpoints.\",\"authors\":\"Michail Vikelis, Dimitrios Rikos, Andreas A Argyriou, Pinelopi Papachristou, Dimitrios Rallis, Theodoros Karapanayiotides, Andreas Galanopoulos, Konstantinos Spingos, Nikolaos Dimisianos, Emmanouil Giakoumakis, Periklis Zavridis, Konstantinos Notas, George S Vlachos, Panagiotis Soldatos, Konstantinos Bilias, Georgia Xiromerisiou, Jobst Rudolf, Emmanouil V Dermitzakis, Alan M Rapoport\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737175.2024.2365312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To identify the preferences and perceptions of migraine patients for acute and preventive treatment options and to investigate which treatment outcomes are the most important.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>The authors performed a choice-format survey in a cohort of migraine patients from Greece and Cyprus. A self-administered questionnaire developed in collaboration with the Greek Society of Migraine Patients was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were collected from 617 migraine patients. Efficacy was preferred over safety as the single most important parameter, both in acute and preventive treatment. When analyzing single outcomes, patients prioritized a complete pain remission at 1-hour post-dose for acute therapies. Regarding migraine prevention, a 75% reduction in frequency, intensity of pain, accompanying symptoms and acute medication intake were considered as most important. Conversely, outcomes routinely used in clinical trials, namely complete or partial pain remission at 2-hours post-dose for acute treatment and 50% or 30% reduction in migraine frequency for prevention, were not deemed particularly relevant. Tablet formulation was mostly preferred, both in acute and preventive treatment. Conclusion: Listening to patients' needs may add a piece of the puzzle that is generally missing in clinical practice and often explains the lack of adherence in both acute and preventative anti-migraine therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"815-826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2365312\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2365312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:确定偏头痛患者对急性和预防性治疗方案的偏好和看法,并调查哪些治疗结果是最重要的:作者对希腊和塞浦路斯的偏头痛患者进行了一次选择形式的调查。采用了与希腊偏头痛患者协会合作开发的自填式问卷:结果:共收集了 617 名偏头痛患者的问卷。无论是急性治疗还是预防性治疗,疗效都比安全性更重要。在分析单一结果时,患者优先考虑急性疗法用药后 1 小时疼痛完全缓解。在偏头痛预防方面,患者认为最重要的是频率、疼痛强度、伴随症状和急性用药量减少 75%。相反,临床试验中常规使用的结果,即急性治疗用药后 2 小时疼痛完全缓解或部分缓解,以及预防用药后偏头痛频率减少 50% 或 30%,被认为并不特别重要。无论是急性治疗还是预防性治疗,片剂都是首选。结论倾听患者的需求可能会为临床实践中普遍缺失的难题增添一环,这往往也是急性和预防性抗偏头痛疗法缺乏依从性的原因所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preferences and perceptions of 617 migraine patients on acute and preventive migraine treatment attributes and clinical trial endpoints.

Background: To identify the preferences and perceptions of migraine patients for acute and preventive treatment options and to investigate which treatment outcomes are the most important.

Design and methods: The authors performed a choice-format survey in a cohort of migraine patients from Greece and Cyprus. A self-administered questionnaire developed in collaboration with the Greek Society of Migraine Patients was used.

Results: Questionnaires were collected from 617 migraine patients. Efficacy was preferred over safety as the single most important parameter, both in acute and preventive treatment. When analyzing single outcomes, patients prioritized a complete pain remission at 1-hour post-dose for acute therapies. Regarding migraine prevention, a 75% reduction in frequency, intensity of pain, accompanying symptoms and acute medication intake were considered as most important. Conversely, outcomes routinely used in clinical trials, namely complete or partial pain remission at 2-hours post-dose for acute treatment and 50% or 30% reduction in migraine frequency for prevention, were not deemed particularly relevant. Tablet formulation was mostly preferred, both in acute and preventive treatment. Conclusion: Listening to patients' needs may add a piece of the puzzle that is generally missing in clinical practice and often explains the lack of adherence in both acute and preventative anti-migraine therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
期刊最新文献
The value of hypothermia as a neuroprotective and antiepileptic strategy in patients with status epilepticus: an update of the literature. UK Medical Cannabis Registry: a cohort study of patients prescribed cannabis-based oils and dried flower for generalised anxiety disorder. The major challenges with pharmacologic management of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Relationship between anti-seizure medication and behaviors that challenge in older persons with intellectual disability and epilepsy: a review. Can pharmacotherapy help to reduce trichotillomania?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1