NRG-BN002:Ipilimumab、Nivolumab 及联合疗法在新诊断的 GBM 患者中的 I 期研究。

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noae058
Andrew E Sloan, Kathryn Winter, Mark R Gilbert, Kenneth Aldape, Serah Choi, Patrick Y Wen, Nicholas Butowski, Fabio M Iwamoto, Raju R Raval, Alfredo D Voloschin, Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka, Minhee Won, Minesh P Mehta
{"title":"NRG-BN002:Ipilimumab、Nivolumab 及联合疗法在新诊断的 GBM 患者中的 I 期研究。","authors":"Andrew E Sloan, Kathryn Winter, Mark R Gilbert, Kenneth Aldape, Serah Choi, Patrick Y Wen, Nicholas Butowski, Fabio M Iwamoto, Raju R Raval, Alfredo D Voloschin, Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka, Minhee Won, Minesh P Mehta","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noae058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have efficacy in several solid tumors but limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). This study evaluated the safety of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 ICIs alone or in combination in newly diagnosed GBM after completion of standard radiochemotherapy with the subsequent intent to test combinatorial ICIs in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for adults with unifocal, supratentorial newly diagnosed GBM after resection and chemoradiation. Ipilimumab and nivolumab were tested separately and in combination with a planned expansion cohort dependent upon DLT results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were enrolled at 9 institutions: 6 to each DLT assessment cohort and 14 to the expansion cohort. Median age: 55 years, 67.7% male, 83.9% White. Treatment was well tolerated with 16% Grade 4 events; the combination did not have unexpectedly increased toxicity, with no Grade 5 events. One DLT was seen in each single-agent treatment; none were observed in the combination, leading to expanded accrual of the combined treatment. The median follow-up was 19.6 months. For all patients receiving combination treatment, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 20.7 and 16.1 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPI and NIVO are safe and tolerable with toxicities similar to those noted with other cancers when given in combination with adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM. Combination IPI + NIVO is not substantially more toxic than single agents. These results support a subsequent efficacy trial to test the combination of ICIs in Phase II/III for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov registration: </strong>NCT02311920.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NRG-BN002: Phase I study of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and the combination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew E Sloan, Kathryn Winter, Mark R Gilbert, Kenneth Aldape, Serah Choi, Patrick Y Wen, Nicholas Butowski, Fabio M Iwamoto, Raju R Raval, Alfredo D Voloschin, Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka, Minhee Won, Minesh P Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/neuonc/noae058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have efficacy in several solid tumors but limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). This study evaluated the safety of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 ICIs alone or in combination in newly diagnosed GBM after completion of standard radiochemotherapy with the subsequent intent to test combinatorial ICIs in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for adults with unifocal, supratentorial newly diagnosed GBM after resection and chemoradiation. Ipilimumab and nivolumab were tested separately and in combination with a planned expansion cohort dependent upon DLT results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were enrolled at 9 institutions: 6 to each DLT assessment cohort and 14 to the expansion cohort. Median age: 55 years, 67.7% male, 83.9% White. Treatment was well tolerated with 16% Grade 4 events; the combination did not have unexpectedly increased toxicity, with no Grade 5 events. One DLT was seen in each single-agent treatment; none were observed in the combination, leading to expanded accrual of the combined treatment. The median follow-up was 19.6 months. For all patients receiving combination treatment, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 20.7 and 16.1 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPI and NIVO are safe and tolerable with toxicities similar to those noted with other cancers when given in combination with adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM. Combination IPI + NIVO is not substantially more toxic than single agents. These results support a subsequent efficacy trial to test the combination of ICIs in Phase II/III for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov registration: </strong>NCT02311920.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376446/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae058\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)对多种实体瘤有疗效,但对胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的疗效有限。这项研究评估了抗CTLA-4和抗PD-1 ICIs单药或联合用药在完成标准放化疗后新诊断的GBM中的安全性,随后打算在这种情况下测试联合ICIs:主要终点是切除和化疗后新诊断为单灶、胸骨上GBM的成人患者的剂量限制性毒性(DLT)。对伊匹单抗和尼伐单抗进行了单独和联合试验,并根据DLT结果计划扩大队列:9家机构共招募了32名患者;每组DLT评估队列中有6名患者,扩增队列中有14名患者。中位年龄:55 岁,67.7% 为男性,83.9% 为白人。治疗耐受性良好,4级事件占16%;联合用药的毒性没有意外增加,没有5级事件。每种单药治疗中都出现了一次 DLT,而联合治疗中未出现任何 DLT,因此扩大了联合治疗的应计范围。中位随访时间为 19.6 个月。所有接受联合治疗的患者的中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为20.7个月和16.1个月:IPI和NIVO联合TMZ辅助治疗新诊断的GBM是安全和可耐受的,其毒性与其他癌症相似。IPI+NIVO联合用药的毒性并不比单一用药大。这些结果支持进行后续疗效试验,在 II/III 期试验中对新诊断的 GBM 患者进行 ICIs 联合用药试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NRG-BN002: Phase I study of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and the combination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have efficacy in several solid tumors but limited efficacy in glioblastoma (GBM). This study evaluated the safety of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 ICIs alone or in combination in newly diagnosed GBM after completion of standard radiochemotherapy with the subsequent intent to test combinatorial ICIs in this setting.

Methods: The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for adults with unifocal, supratentorial newly diagnosed GBM after resection and chemoradiation. Ipilimumab and nivolumab were tested separately and in combination with a planned expansion cohort dependent upon DLT results.

Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled at 9 institutions: 6 to each DLT assessment cohort and 14 to the expansion cohort. Median age: 55 years, 67.7% male, 83.9% White. Treatment was well tolerated with 16% Grade 4 events; the combination did not have unexpectedly increased toxicity, with no Grade 5 events. One DLT was seen in each single-agent treatment; none were observed in the combination, leading to expanded accrual of the combined treatment. The median follow-up was 19.6 months. For all patients receiving combination treatment, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 20.7 and 16.1 months, respectively.

Conclusions: IPI and NIVO are safe and tolerable with toxicities similar to those noted with other cancers when given in combination with adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM. Combination IPI + NIVO is not substantially more toxic than single agents. These results support a subsequent efficacy trial to test the combination of ICIs in Phase II/III for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT02311920.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Brain tumoroids: treatment prediction and drug development for brain tumors with fast, reproducible and easy-to-use personalized models Cognitive phenotypes: Unraveling the heterogeneity in cognitive dysfunction among patients with primary brain tumors receiving radiotherapy. EGFR and EGFRvIII coopt host defense pathways, promoting progression in glioblastoma. Marizomib for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A randomized phase 3 trial. EDA2R reflects the acute brain response to cranial irradiation in liquid biopsies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1