专家评估早期巴雷特癌的浸润深度并推荐内窥镜切除技术。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY United European Gastroenterology Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1002/ueg2.12604
Fadi Younis, Thomas Rösch, Torsten Beyna, Alanna Ebigbo, Siegbert Faiss, Andrea May, Oliver Pech, Philip Dautel, Mario Anders, Till Clauditz, Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich, Susanne Sehner, Guido Schachschal
{"title":"专家评估早期巴雷特癌的浸润深度并推荐内窥镜切除技术。","authors":"Fadi Younis, Thomas Rösch, Torsten Beyna, Alanna Ebigbo, Siegbert Faiss, Andrea May, Oliver Pech, Philip Dautel, Mario Anders, Till Clauditz, Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich, Susanne Sehner, Guido Schachschal","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.12604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early Barrett cancer can be curatively treated by endoscopic resection. The choice of the resection technique, however-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD)-largely depends on the assumed infiltration depth as judged by the endoscopist. However, the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis of the degree of cancer infiltration is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three to four high-quality images (both in overview and close-up) from 202 of early Barrett esophagus cancer cases (82% men, mean age 66.9 years) were selected from our endoscopy database (73.3% stage T1a and 26.7% in stage T1b). Images were shown to 9 Barrett esophagus experts, with patients' clinical data (age, sex, Barrett esophagus length) and biopsy results. The experts were asked to predict infiltration depth (T1b vs. T1a), and to suggest the appropriate endoscopic resection technique (EMR or ESD, or surgery). Interobserver variability (kappa values) was also determined for these parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) to diagnose T1b versus T1a infiltration were 40.7% (95% CI: 36.7, 44.8) and 79.8% (95% CI: 77.5, 81.9), respectively; kappa value was 0.41. Paris classification (kappa 0.51) and suggested treatment also varied between experts. In a post hoc analysis, only the correlation between lesions classified as invisible or flat according to the Paris classification (IIB; 25% of all cases) and the suggested resection technique was better: In this subgroup, EMR was recommended in >80% of cases, with a high complete (basal R0) resection rate (mean of 88.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Precise endoscopic distinction between mucosal and submucosal involvement of Barrett esophagus cancer by experts as a basis for choosing the resection technique has limited predictive values and high interobserver variability. It seems that mainly invisible/flat lesions may result in good resection outcomes when treated by EMR, but this stratification strategy has to be assessed in further studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"848-858"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert assessment of infiltration depth and recommendation of endoscopic resection technique in early Barrett cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Fadi Younis, Thomas Rösch, Torsten Beyna, Alanna Ebigbo, Siegbert Faiss, Andrea May, Oliver Pech, Philip Dautel, Mario Anders, Till Clauditz, Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich, Susanne Sehner, Guido Schachschal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.12604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early Barrett cancer can be curatively treated by endoscopic resection. The choice of the resection technique, however-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD)-largely depends on the assumed infiltration depth as judged by the endoscopist. However, the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis of the degree of cancer infiltration is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three to four high-quality images (both in overview and close-up) from 202 of early Barrett esophagus cancer cases (82% men, mean age 66.9 years) were selected from our endoscopy database (73.3% stage T1a and 26.7% in stage T1b). Images were shown to 9 Barrett esophagus experts, with patients' clinical data (age, sex, Barrett esophagus length) and biopsy results. The experts were asked to predict infiltration depth (T1b vs. T1a), and to suggest the appropriate endoscopic resection technique (EMR or ESD, or surgery). Interobserver variability (kappa values) was also determined for these parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) to diagnose T1b versus T1a infiltration were 40.7% (95% CI: 36.7, 44.8) and 79.8% (95% CI: 77.5, 81.9), respectively; kappa value was 0.41. Paris classification (kappa 0.51) and suggested treatment also varied between experts. In a post hoc analysis, only the correlation between lesions classified as invisible or flat according to the Paris classification (IIB; 25% of all cases) and the suggested resection technique was better: In this subgroup, EMR was recommended in >80% of cases, with a high complete (basal R0) resection rate (mean of 88.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Precise endoscopic distinction between mucosal and submucosal involvement of Barrett esophagus cancer by experts as a basis for choosing the resection technique has limited predictive values and high interobserver variability. It seems that mainly invisible/flat lesions may result in good resection outcomes when treated by EMR, but this stratification strategy has to be assessed in further studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"848-858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497735/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12604\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期巴雷特癌可通过内镜切除术进行根治性治疗。然而,切除技术--内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)或粘膜下剥离术(ESD)--的选择在很大程度上取决于内镜医师判断的假定浸润深度。然而,内镜诊断癌症浸润程度的准确性尚不清楚:从我们的内镜数据库中选取了 202 例早期巴雷特食管癌病例(82% 为男性,平均年龄 66.9 岁)(73.3% 为 T1a 期,26.7% 为 T1b 期)的三到四张高质量图像(包括概览和特写)。我们向 9 位巴雷特食管专家展示了这些图像以及患者的临床数据(年龄、性别、巴雷特食管长度)和活检结果。专家们被要求预测浸润深度(T1b 与 T1a),并建议适当的内镜切除技术(EMR 或 ESD 或手术)。同时还确定了这些参数的观察者间变异性(卡帕值):诊断 T1b 与 T1a 浸润的总体阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为 40.7%(95% CI:36.7, 44.8)和 79.8%(95% CI:77.5, 81.9);卡帕值为 0.41。巴黎分级(kappa 0.51)和建议的治疗方法也因专家而异。在事后分析中,只有根据巴黎分类法被归类为隐形或扁平的病灶(IIB;占所有病例的 25%)与建议的切除技术之间的相关性较好:在这一分组中,超过80%的病例建议采用EMR,完全(基底R0)切除率很高(平均88.1%):结论:由专家通过内窥镜精确区分巴雷特食管癌的粘膜和粘膜下受累情况,并以此作为选择切除技术的依据,其预测价值有限,且观察者之间的变异性很高。看来,主要为隐形/扁平病变的食管癌在采用内镜下切除术治疗时可能会取得良好的切除效果,但这种分层策略还需进一步研究评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expert assessment of infiltration depth and recommendation of endoscopic resection technique in early Barrett cancer.

Background: Early Barrett cancer can be curatively treated by endoscopic resection. The choice of the resection technique, however-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD)-largely depends on the assumed infiltration depth as judged by the endoscopist. However, the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis of the degree of cancer infiltration is not known.

Methods: Three to four high-quality images (both in overview and close-up) from 202 of early Barrett esophagus cancer cases (82% men, mean age 66.9 years) were selected from our endoscopy database (73.3% stage T1a and 26.7% in stage T1b). Images were shown to 9 Barrett esophagus experts, with patients' clinical data (age, sex, Barrett esophagus length) and biopsy results. The experts were asked to predict infiltration depth (T1b vs. T1a), and to suggest the appropriate endoscopic resection technique (EMR or ESD, or surgery). Interobserver variability (kappa values) was also determined for these parameters.

Results: Overall positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) to diagnose T1b versus T1a infiltration were 40.7% (95% CI: 36.7, 44.8) and 79.8% (95% CI: 77.5, 81.9), respectively; kappa value was 0.41. Paris classification (kappa 0.51) and suggested treatment also varied between experts. In a post hoc analysis, only the correlation between lesions classified as invisible or flat according to the Paris classification (IIB; 25% of all cases) and the suggested resection technique was better: In this subgroup, EMR was recommended in >80% of cases, with a high complete (basal R0) resection rate (mean of 88.1%).

Conclusions: Precise endoscopic distinction between mucosal and submucosal involvement of Barrett esophagus cancer by experts as a basis for choosing the resection technique has limited predictive values and high interobserver variability. It seems that mainly invisible/flat lesions may result in good resection outcomes when treated by EMR, but this stratification strategy has to be assessed in further studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia: Report of 82 Patients and Systematic Review of Literature. Risk of Cancer Diagnosis in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using a Nationwide Swedish Population Cohort. Expanding Support Beyond Clinical Care in IBD Patients. Prior metabolic and bariatric surgery is an independent determinant of severity of decompensation in alcohol-associated liver disease. Heterogeneity of definition of upper gastrointestinal tract in different guidelines of Crohn's disease: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1