人机协作中的流程--工业场景中的多模式分析和感知挑战检测。

IF 2.9 Q2 ROBOTICS Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2024.1393795
Pooja Prajod, Matteo Lavit Nicora, Marta Mondellini, Matteo Meregalli Falerni, Rocco Vertechy, Matteo Malosio, Elisabeth André
{"title":"人机协作中的流程--工业场景中的多模式分析和感知挑战检测。","authors":"Pooja Prajod, Matteo Lavit Nicora, Marta Mondellini, Matteo Meregalli Falerni, Rocco Vertechy, Matteo Malosio, Elisabeth André","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1393795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Flow state, the optimal experience resulting from the equilibrium between perceived challenge and skill level, has been extensively studied in various domains. However, its occurrence in industrial settings has remained relatively unexplored. Notably, the literature predominantly focuses on Flow within mentally demanding tasks, which differ significantly from industrial tasks. Consequently, our understanding of emotional and physiological responses to varying challenge levels, specifically in the context of industry-like tasks, remains limited. <b>Methods:</b> To bridge this gap, we investigate how facial emotion estimation (valence, arousal) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) features vary with the perceived challenge levels during industrial assembly tasks. Our study involves an assembly scenario that simulates an industrial human-robot collaboration task with three distinct challenge levels. As part of our study, we collected video, electrocardiogram (ECG), and NASA-TLX questionnaire data from 37 participants. <b>Results:</b> Our results demonstrate a significant difference in mean arousal and heart rate between the low-challenge (Boredom) condition and the other conditions. We also found a noticeable trend-level difference in mean heart rate between the adaptive (Flow) and high-challenge (Anxiety) conditions. Similar differences were also observed in a few other temporal HRV features like Mean NN and Triangular index. Considering the characteristics of typical industrial assembly tasks, we aim to facilitate Flow by detecting and balancing the perceived challenge levels. Leveraging our analysis results, we developed an HRV-based machine learning model for discerning perceived challenge levels, distinguishing between low and higher-challenge conditions. <b>Discussion:</b> This work deepens our understanding of emotional and physiological responses to perceived challenge levels in industrial contexts and provides valuable insights for the design of adaptive work environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow in human-robot collaboration-multimodal analysis and perceived challenge detection in industrial scenarios.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Prajod, Matteo Lavit Nicora, Marta Mondellini, Matteo Meregalli Falerni, Rocco Vertechy, Matteo Malosio, Elisabeth André\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frobt.2024.1393795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Flow state, the optimal experience resulting from the equilibrium between perceived challenge and skill level, has been extensively studied in various domains. However, its occurrence in industrial settings has remained relatively unexplored. Notably, the literature predominantly focuses on Flow within mentally demanding tasks, which differ significantly from industrial tasks. Consequently, our understanding of emotional and physiological responses to varying challenge levels, specifically in the context of industry-like tasks, remains limited. <b>Methods:</b> To bridge this gap, we investigate how facial emotion estimation (valence, arousal) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) features vary with the perceived challenge levels during industrial assembly tasks. Our study involves an assembly scenario that simulates an industrial human-robot collaboration task with three distinct challenge levels. As part of our study, we collected video, electrocardiogram (ECG), and NASA-TLX questionnaire data from 37 participants. <b>Results:</b> Our results demonstrate a significant difference in mean arousal and heart rate between the low-challenge (Boredom) condition and the other conditions. We also found a noticeable trend-level difference in mean heart rate between the adaptive (Flow) and high-challenge (Anxiety) conditions. Similar differences were also observed in a few other temporal HRV features like Mean NN and Triangular index. Considering the characteristics of typical industrial assembly tasks, we aim to facilitate Flow by detecting and balancing the perceived challenge levels. Leveraging our analysis results, we developed an HRV-based machine learning model for discerning perceived challenge levels, distinguishing between low and higher-challenge conditions. <b>Discussion:</b> This work deepens our understanding of emotional and physiological responses to perceived challenge levels in industrial contexts and provides valuable insights for the design of adaptive work environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Robotics and AI\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Robotics and AI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1393795\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ROBOTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1393795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言流状态是由感知到的挑战和技能水平之间的平衡所产生的最佳体验,已在多个领域得到广泛研究。然而,在工业环境中出现这种状态的情况还相对较少。值得注意的是,文献主要关注的是精神要求较高的任务中的 "流",这与工业任务有很大不同。因此,我们对不同挑战水平下的情绪和生理反应的了解仍然有限,特别是在类似工业任务的背景下。研究方法为了弥补这一不足,我们研究了在工业装配任务中,面部情绪估计(情绪价值、唤醒)和心率变异(HRV)特征如何随感知到的挑战水平而变化。我们的研究涉及一个装配场景,该场景模拟了具有三种不同挑战水平的工业人机协作任务。作为研究的一部分,我们收集了 37 名参与者的视频、心电图和 NASA-TLX 问卷数据。研究结果我们的研究结果表明,低挑战(无聊)条件与其他条件下的平均唤醒度和心率存在明显差异。我们还发现,适应(流动)和高挑战(焦虑)条件下的平均心率存在明显的趋势性差异。在其他一些时间心率变异特征(如平均 NN 和三角指数)中也观察到了类似的差异。考虑到典型工业装配任务的特点,我们的目标是通过检测和平衡感知到的挑战水平来促进 "流"。利用我们的分析结果,我们开发了一个基于心率变异的机器学习模型,用于辨别感知挑战水平,区分低挑战和高挑战条件。讨论:这项工作加深了我们对工业环境中感知挑战水平的情绪和生理反应的理解,为设计适应性工作环境提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flow in human-robot collaboration-multimodal analysis and perceived challenge detection in industrial scenarios.

Introduction: Flow state, the optimal experience resulting from the equilibrium between perceived challenge and skill level, has been extensively studied in various domains. However, its occurrence in industrial settings has remained relatively unexplored. Notably, the literature predominantly focuses on Flow within mentally demanding tasks, which differ significantly from industrial tasks. Consequently, our understanding of emotional and physiological responses to varying challenge levels, specifically in the context of industry-like tasks, remains limited. Methods: To bridge this gap, we investigate how facial emotion estimation (valence, arousal) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) features vary with the perceived challenge levels during industrial assembly tasks. Our study involves an assembly scenario that simulates an industrial human-robot collaboration task with three distinct challenge levels. As part of our study, we collected video, electrocardiogram (ECG), and NASA-TLX questionnaire data from 37 participants. Results: Our results demonstrate a significant difference in mean arousal and heart rate between the low-challenge (Boredom) condition and the other conditions. We also found a noticeable trend-level difference in mean heart rate between the adaptive (Flow) and high-challenge (Anxiety) conditions. Similar differences were also observed in a few other temporal HRV features like Mean NN and Triangular index. Considering the characteristics of typical industrial assembly tasks, we aim to facilitate Flow by detecting and balancing the perceived challenge levels. Leveraging our analysis results, we developed an HRV-based machine learning model for discerning perceived challenge levels, distinguishing between low and higher-challenge conditions. Discussion: This work deepens our understanding of emotional and physiological responses to perceived challenge levels in industrial contexts and provides valuable insights for the design of adaptive work environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
期刊最新文献
Cybernic robot hand-arm that realizes cooperative work as a new hand-arm for people with a single upper-limb dysfunction. Advancements in the use of AI in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Remote science at sea with remotely operated vehicles. A pipeline for estimating human attention toward objects with on-board cameras on the iCub humanoid robot. Leveraging imitation learning in agricultural robotics: a comprehensive survey and comparative analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1