前交叉韧带重建中骨-髌腱-骨移植胫骨固定的力学评估--骨塞张力固定/BTF 系统与干扰螺钉的对比。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1055/a-2344-5195
Ryo Iuchi, Konsei Shino, Tatsuo Mae, Satoshi Yamakawa, Ken Nakata
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建中骨-髌腱-骨移植胫骨固定的力学评估--骨塞张力固定/BTF 系统与干扰螺钉的对比。","authors":"Ryo Iuchi, Konsei Shino, Tatsuo Mae, Satoshi Yamakawa, Ken Nakata","doi":"10.1055/a-2344-5195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of bone plug fixation to the tibia with a novel device, the Bone plug Tensioning and Fixation (BTF) system.Forty bone-tendon-bone grafts consisting of the whole patella-patellar tendon-tibial bone plug of 10-mm width and tibiae from the porcine were prepared. After creating a 10-mm tibial tunnel, the tibial bone plug was fixed to the tibia with the BTF system or the interference screw (IFS) to prepare a test specimen of the patella-patellar tendon-tibial bone plug fixed to the tibia. For the graft tension controllability study, a predetermined initial tension of 9.8 or 19.6 N was applied and maintained for 5 minutes. Then the bone plug was fixed to the tibia with the BTF system or IFS in 10 specimens, monitoring the residual tension for an additional 5 minutes. Then, a cyclic loading test and a tension-to-failure test were performed.The mean difference between the residual tension and the predetermined tension was significantly smaller in BTF fixation (9.8 N → 10.6 ± 2.2 N; 19.6 N → 18.9 ± 2.1 N) than in IFS fixation (9.8 N → 23.4 ± 7.4 N; 19.6 N → 28.9 ± 11.5 N). The mean displacement of the bone plug after cyclic loading was significantly less in the BTF group (1.2 ± 0.6 mm) than in the IFS group (2.2 ± 1.0 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Stiffness was significantly greater in the BTF group (504.6 ± 148.8 N/mm) than in the IFS group (294.7 ± 96.7 N/mm; <i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas the maximum failure loads in the two groups did not differ significantly (724.2 ± 180.3 N in the BTF and 634.8 ± 159.4 N in the IFS groups).BTF system better performed in graft tension controllability than IFS did. BTF fixation was superior to IFS fixation in the displacement of the bone plug during the cyclic loading test and in stiffness in the tension-to-failure test.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"894-901"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical Evaluation of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Fixation to the Tibia in ACL Reconstruction: Bone Plug Tensioning and Fixation System versus Interference Screw.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Iuchi, Konsei Shino, Tatsuo Mae, Satoshi Yamakawa, Ken Nakata\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2344-5195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of bone plug fixation to the tibia with a novel device, the Bone plug Tensioning and Fixation (BTF) system.Forty bone-tendon-bone grafts consisting of the whole patella-patellar tendon-tibial bone plug of 10-mm width and tibiae from the porcine were prepared. After creating a 10-mm tibial tunnel, the tibial bone plug was fixed to the tibia with the BTF system or the interference screw (IFS) to prepare a test specimen of the patella-patellar tendon-tibial bone plug fixed to the tibia. For the graft tension controllability study, a predetermined initial tension of 9.8 or 19.6 N was applied and maintained for 5 minutes. Then the bone plug was fixed to the tibia with the BTF system or IFS in 10 specimens, monitoring the residual tension for an additional 5 minutes. Then, a cyclic loading test and a tension-to-failure test were performed.The mean difference between the residual tension and the predetermined tension was significantly smaller in BTF fixation (9.8 N → 10.6 ± 2.2 N; 19.6 N → 18.9 ± 2.1 N) than in IFS fixation (9.8 N → 23.4 ± 7.4 N; 19.6 N → 28.9 ± 11.5 N). The mean displacement of the bone plug after cyclic loading was significantly less in the BTF group (1.2 ± 0.6 mm) than in the IFS group (2.2 ± 1.0 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Stiffness was significantly greater in the BTF group (504.6 ± 148.8 N/mm) than in the IFS group (294.7 ± 96.7 N/mm; <i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas the maximum failure loads in the two groups did not differ significantly (724.2 ± 180.3 N in the BTF and 634.8 ± 159.4 N in the IFS groups).BTF system better performed in graft tension controllability than IFS did. BTF fixation was superior to IFS fixation in the displacement of the bone plug during the cyclic loading test and in stiffness in the tension-to-failure test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"894-901\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Knee Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2344-5195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2344-5195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估使用新型装置--骨塞张力和固定(BTF)系统将骨塞固定到胫骨上的机械性能:方法:制备 40 块骨-腱-骨移植物,包括宽度为 10 毫米的整个髌骨-髌腱-胫骨骨塞和猪的胫骨。创建 10 毫米胫骨隧道后,用 BTF 系统或过盈螺钉(IFS)将胫骨骨塞固定在胫骨上,制备出髌骨-髌腱-胫骨骨塞固定在胫骨上的测试样本。在移植物张力可控性研究中,先施加 9.8 或 19.6 N 的预定初始张力并保持 5 分钟,然后用 BTF 系统将 10 个或 IFS 将 10 个试样中的骨塞固定到胫骨上,再监测残余张力 5 分钟。然后,进行循环加载试验和拉力至破坏试验:结果:BTF 固定的残余张力与预定张力之间的平均差异(9.8N→10.6±2.2N;19.6N→18.9±2.1N)明显小于 IFS 固定(9.8N→23.4±7.4 N;19.6N→28.9±11.5N)。循环加载后,BTF 组骨塞的平均位移(1.2 ± 0.6 mm)明显小于 IFS 组(2.2 ± 1.0 mm;P < 0.01)。BTF组的刚度(504.6 ± 148.8 N/mm)明显高于IFS组(294.7 ± 96.7 N/mm;p < 0.01),而两组的最大破坏载荷没有明显差异(BTF组为724.2 ± 180.3 N,IFS组为634.8 ± 159.4 N):结论:BTF系统的移植物张力可控性优于IFS系统。结论:BTF 固定系统在移植物张力可控性方面的表现优于 IFS 固定系统。BTF 固定系统在循环加载测试中骨塞的位移方面优于 IFS 固定系统,在拉力至破坏测试中的刚度方面也优于 IFS 固定系统。.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mechanical Evaluation of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Fixation to the Tibia in ACL Reconstruction: Bone Plug Tensioning and Fixation System versus Interference Screw.

This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of bone plug fixation to the tibia with a novel device, the Bone plug Tensioning and Fixation (BTF) system.Forty bone-tendon-bone grafts consisting of the whole patella-patellar tendon-tibial bone plug of 10-mm width and tibiae from the porcine were prepared. After creating a 10-mm tibial tunnel, the tibial bone plug was fixed to the tibia with the BTF system or the interference screw (IFS) to prepare a test specimen of the patella-patellar tendon-tibial bone plug fixed to the tibia. For the graft tension controllability study, a predetermined initial tension of 9.8 or 19.6 N was applied and maintained for 5 minutes. Then the bone plug was fixed to the tibia with the BTF system or IFS in 10 specimens, monitoring the residual tension for an additional 5 minutes. Then, a cyclic loading test and a tension-to-failure test were performed.The mean difference between the residual tension and the predetermined tension was significantly smaller in BTF fixation (9.8 N → 10.6 ± 2.2 N; 19.6 N → 18.9 ± 2.1 N) than in IFS fixation (9.8 N → 23.4 ± 7.4 N; 19.6 N → 28.9 ± 11.5 N). The mean displacement of the bone plug after cyclic loading was significantly less in the BTF group (1.2 ± 0.6 mm) than in the IFS group (2.2 ± 1.0 mm; p < 0.01). Stiffness was significantly greater in the BTF group (504.6 ± 148.8 N/mm) than in the IFS group (294.7 ± 96.7 N/mm; p < 0.01), whereas the maximum failure loads in the two groups did not differ significantly (724.2 ± 180.3 N in the BTF and 634.8 ± 159.4 N in the IFS groups).BTF system better performed in graft tension controllability than IFS did. BTF fixation was superior to IFS fixation in the displacement of the bone plug during the cyclic loading test and in stiffness in the tension-to-failure test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
期刊最新文献
Articular Cartilage Damage in the Patellofemoral Compartment at ACL Reconstruction Predicts Poor Postoperative Subjective Outcomes in Patients Age 40 and Older. Survey Results Concerning Current Trends in Meniscus Repair Indications and Preferences from Members of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Society. Impact of Joint Laxity on 2-Year KOOS Outcomes of Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty. Interatrial Wall Abnormality is Associated with Adverse Same-Admission Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Survivorship of Primary NexGen Knee Replacement: Comparing Cementless Trabecular Metal to Other Designs of Tibial Component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1