非选择性剖宫产术后辅助使用阿奇霉素抗生素预防的足月儿和早产儿的新生儿预后。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1080/14767058.2024.2367082
Jane K Martin, Sherri A Longo, Victoria R Jauk, Erin A S Clark, George R Saade, Kim A Boggess, Sean Esplin, Ronald J Wapner, Michelle Y Owens, Sean C Blackwell, William W Andrews, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T Tita
{"title":"非选择性剖宫产术后辅助使用阿奇霉素抗生素预防的足月儿和早产儿的新生儿预后。","authors":"Jane K Martin, Sherri A Longo, Victoria R Jauk, Erin A S Clark, George R Saade, Kim A Boggess, Sean Esplin, Ronald J Wapner, Michelle Y Owens, Sean C Blackwell, William W Andrews, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T Tita","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2367082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is currently unknown whether adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis at the time of non-elective cesarean has differential effects on neonatal outcomes in the context of prematurity. The objective of this study was to compare whether neonatal outcomes differ in term and preterm infants exposed to adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial that enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation undergoing non-elective cesarean delivery (during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Women received standard antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized to either adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg) or placebo. The primary composite outcome was neonatal death, suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis, and serious neonatal morbidities (NEC, PVL, IVH, BPD). Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal readmission, culture positive infections and prevalence of resistant organisms. Odds ratios (OR) for the effect of azithromycin versus placebo were compared between gestational age strata (preterm [less than 37 weeks] versus term [37 weeks or greater]). Tests of interaction examined homogeneity of treatment effect with gestational age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis includes 2,013 infants, 226 preterm (11.2%) and 1,787 term. Mean gestational ages were 34 and 39.5 weeks, respectively. Within term and preterm strata, maternal and delivery characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups. There was no difference in the odds of composite neonatal outcome between those exposed to azithromycin versus placebo in preterm neonates (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.41) and in term neonates (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.46), with no difference between gestational age strata (<i>p</i> = 0.42). Analysis of secondary outcomes also revealed no differences in treatment effects within or between gestational age strata.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery does not increase neonatal morbidity or mortality in term or preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01235546.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":"2367082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neonatal outcomes in term and preterm infants following adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Jane K Martin, Sherri A Longo, Victoria R Jauk, Erin A S Clark, George R Saade, Kim A Boggess, Sean Esplin, Ronald J Wapner, Michelle Y Owens, Sean C Blackwell, William W Andrews, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T Tita\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2024.2367082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is currently unknown whether adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis at the time of non-elective cesarean has differential effects on neonatal outcomes in the context of prematurity. The objective of this study was to compare whether neonatal outcomes differ in term and preterm infants exposed to adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial that enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation undergoing non-elective cesarean delivery (during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Women received standard antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized to either adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg) or placebo. The primary composite outcome was neonatal death, suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis, and serious neonatal morbidities (NEC, PVL, IVH, BPD). Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal readmission, culture positive infections and prevalence of resistant organisms. Odds ratios (OR) for the effect of azithromycin versus placebo were compared between gestational age strata (preterm [less than 37 weeks] versus term [37 weeks or greater]). Tests of interaction examined homogeneity of treatment effect with gestational age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis includes 2,013 infants, 226 preterm (11.2%) and 1,787 term. Mean gestational ages were 34 and 39.5 weeks, respectively. Within term and preterm strata, maternal and delivery characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups. There was no difference in the odds of composite neonatal outcome between those exposed to azithromycin versus placebo in preterm neonates (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.41) and in term neonates (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.46), with no difference between gestational age strata (<i>p</i> = 0.42). Analysis of secondary outcomes also revealed no differences in treatment effects within or between gestational age strata.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery does not increase neonatal morbidity or mortality in term or preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01235546.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"2367082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2367082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2367082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前尚不清楚在非选择性剖宫产时辅助使用阿奇霉素是否会对早产儿的新生儿预后产生不同影响。本研究旨在比较在非选择性剖宫产前接受阿奇霉素辅助预防的足月儿和早产儿的新生儿预后是否存在差异:研究设计:一项多中心随机对照试验的计划二次分析,该试验招募了妊娠≥24周、接受非选择性剖宫产(分娩过程中或胎膜破裂后≥4小时)的单胎妊娠妇女。产妇接受标准抗生素预防,并随机接受阿奇霉素(500 毫克)或安慰剂辅助治疗。主要综合结果为新生儿死亡、疑似或确诊新生儿败血症、新生儿严重发病(NEC、PVL、IVH、BPD)。次要结果包括新生儿重症监护室入院率、新生儿再入院率、培养阳性感染率和耐药菌感染率。在不同胎龄层(早产[小于 37 周]与足月[37 周或以上])之间比较了阿奇霉素与安慰剂的效应比(OR)。交互作用测试检验了治疗效果与胎龄的同质性:分析包括 2,013 名婴儿,其中早产儿 226 名(11.2%),足月儿 1,787 名。平均胎龄分别为 34 周和 39.5 周。在足月儿和早产儿组中,阿奇霉素组和安慰剂组的产妇和分娩特征相似。在早产新生儿(OR 0.82,95% CI 0.48-1.41)和足月新生儿(OR 1.06,95% CI 0.77-1.46)中,阿奇霉素组与安慰剂组的新生儿综合结局几率没有差异,胎龄分层之间也没有差异(P = 0.42)。对次要结果的分析也显示,妊娠年龄层内或妊娠年龄层之间的治疗效果没有差异:临床试验注册:https://clinicaltrials.gov,NCT01235546。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neonatal outcomes in term and preterm infants following adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery.

Objective: It is currently unknown whether adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis at the time of non-elective cesarean has differential effects on neonatal outcomes in the context of prematurity. The objective of this study was to compare whether neonatal outcomes differ in term and preterm infants exposed to adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean delivery.

Study design: A planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial that enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation undergoing non-elective cesarean delivery (during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Women received standard antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized to either adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg) or placebo. The primary composite outcome was neonatal death, suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis, and serious neonatal morbidities (NEC, PVL, IVH, BPD). Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal readmission, culture positive infections and prevalence of resistant organisms. Odds ratios (OR) for the effect of azithromycin versus placebo were compared between gestational age strata (preterm [less than 37 weeks] versus term [37 weeks or greater]). Tests of interaction examined homogeneity of treatment effect with gestational age.

Results: The analysis includes 2,013 infants, 226 preterm (11.2%) and 1,787 term. Mean gestational ages were 34 and 39.5 weeks, respectively. Within term and preterm strata, maternal and delivery characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups. There was no difference in the odds of composite neonatal outcome between those exposed to azithromycin versus placebo in preterm neonates (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.41) and in term neonates (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.46), with no difference between gestational age strata (p = 0.42). Analysis of secondary outcomes also revealed no differences in treatment effects within or between gestational age strata.

Conclusion: Exposure to adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery does not increase neonatal morbidity or mortality in term or preterm infants.

Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01235546.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
期刊最新文献
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of different blue light therapy methods for neonatal jaundice. A meta-analysis of metformin and insulin on maternal outcome and neonatal outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Outcomes in low-risk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39-week elective induction of labor. Serotype distribution, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of group B Streptococcus isolates from Chinese pregnant woman. Accuracy of transcutaneous bilirubinometry in term infants after phototherapy: a prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1