新诊断或复发前列腺癌患者的 18F-Flotufolastat 图像解读的读片机间和读片机内再现性:两项 3 期前瞻性多中心研究的数据。

Phillip H Kuo, Giuseppe Esposito, Gary A Ulaner, Don Yoo, Katherine Zukotynski, Gregory C Ravizzini, Ross Penny, Matthew P Miller, Albert Chau, Phillip Davis, Brian F Chapin, David M Schuster
{"title":"新诊断或复发前列腺癌患者的 18F-Flotufolastat 图像解读的读片机间和读片机内再现性:两项 3 期前瞻性多中心研究的数据。","authors":"Phillip H Kuo, Giuseppe Esposito, Gary A Ulaner, Don Yoo, Katherine Zukotynski, Gregory C Ravizzini, Ross Penny, Matthew P Miller, Albert Chau, Phillip Davis, Brian F Chapin, David M Schuster","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.267306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interreader and intrareader reproducibility of <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat PET/CT scans in newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer patients was assessed from masked image evaluations from two phase 3 studies. <b>Methods:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat PET/CT images of newly diagnosed (<i>n</i> = 352) or recurrent (<i>n</i> = 389) patients were evaluated by 3 masked readers. Cohen κ was used to assess pairwise patient- and region-level interreader agreement. Agreement among all readers was assessed using Fleiss κ. Intrareader agreement between the first and repeat read (20% of images, ≥4 wk later) was assessed using Cohen κ. <b>Results:</b> Pairwise interreader agreement was 95% or better (newly diagnosed) and 75% or better (recurrent). The κ coefficients were impacted by the high-agreement-low-κ paradox: Cohen κ ranged from not estimable to 0.55, whereas Fleiss κ was 0.50 (newly diagnosed) and 0.41 (recurrent). Agreement was highest in the prostate of newly diagnosed patients (≥95%) and in the pelvic lymph nodes in recurrent patients (≥87%). Intrareader agreement was 86% or better across both populations. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat PET/CT images can be reliably interpreted, with a high degree of inter- and intrareader agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interreader and Intrareader Reproducibility of <sup>18</sup>F-Flotufolastat Image Interpretation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Data from Two Phase 3 Prospective Multicenter Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip H Kuo, Giuseppe Esposito, Gary A Ulaner, Don Yoo, Katherine Zukotynski, Gregory C Ravizzini, Ross Penny, Matthew P Miller, Albert Chau, Phillip Davis, Brian F Chapin, David M Schuster\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.123.267306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interreader and intrareader reproducibility of <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat PET/CT scans in newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer patients was assessed from masked image evaluations from two phase 3 studies. <b>Methods:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat PET/CT images of newly diagnosed (<i>n</i> = 352) or recurrent (<i>n</i> = 389) patients were evaluated by 3 masked readers. Cohen κ was used to assess pairwise patient- and region-level interreader agreement. Agreement among all readers was assessed using Fleiss κ. Intrareader agreement between the first and repeat read (20% of images, ≥4 wk later) was assessed using Cohen κ. <b>Results:</b> Pairwise interreader agreement was 95% or better (newly diagnosed) and 75% or better (recurrent). The κ coefficients were impacted by the high-agreement-low-κ paradox: Cohen κ ranged from not estimable to 0.55, whereas Fleiss κ was 0.50 (newly diagnosed) and 0.41 (recurrent). Agreement was highest in the prostate of newly diagnosed patients (≥95%) and in the pelvic lymph nodes in recurrent patients (≥87%). Intrareader agreement was 86% or better across both populations. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-flotufolastat PET/CT images can be reliably interpreted, with a high degree of inter- and intrareader agreement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.267306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据两项三期研究的蒙面图像评估结果,对新诊断和复发前列腺癌患者的18F-氟磷灰石PET/CT扫描的读片者之间和读片者内部的可重复性进行评估。方法:新诊断(352 人)或复发(389 人)前列腺癌患者的 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT 图像由 3 名蒙面阅读者进行评估。Cohen κ用于评估成对患者和区域级别的读片者之间的一致性。使用 Fleiss κ 评估所有阅读者之间的一致性。首次读片和重复读片(20% 的图像,≥4 周后)之间的读片者内部一致性采用 Cohen κ 进行评估。结果显示读片者之间的配对一致性达到或超过 95%(新诊断)和 75%(复发)。κ系数受到高一致性-低κ悖论的影响:Cohen κ从不可估计到0.55不等,而Fleiss κ为0.50(新诊断)和0.41(复发)。新诊断患者前列腺的一致性最高(≥95%),复发患者盆腔淋巴结的一致性最高(≥87%)。两种人群的读片器内一致性均达到或超过 86%。结论:18F-氟夫司他 PET/CT 图像可以可靠地解读,阅片师之间和阅片师内部的一致性很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interreader and Intrareader Reproducibility of 18F-Flotufolastat Image Interpretation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Data from Two Phase 3 Prospective Multicenter Studies.

Interreader and intrareader reproducibility of 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT scans in newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer patients was assessed from masked image evaluations from two phase 3 studies. Methods: 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT images of newly diagnosed (n = 352) or recurrent (n = 389) patients were evaluated by 3 masked readers. Cohen κ was used to assess pairwise patient- and region-level interreader agreement. Agreement among all readers was assessed using Fleiss κ. Intrareader agreement between the first and repeat read (20% of images, ≥4 wk later) was assessed using Cohen κ. Results: Pairwise interreader agreement was 95% or better (newly diagnosed) and 75% or better (recurrent). The κ coefficients were impacted by the high-agreement-low-κ paradox: Cohen κ ranged from not estimable to 0.55, whereas Fleiss κ was 0.50 (newly diagnosed) and 0.41 (recurrent). Agreement was highest in the prostate of newly diagnosed patients (≥95%) and in the pelvic lymph nodes in recurrent patients (≥87%). Intrareader agreement was 86% or better across both populations. Conclusion: 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT images can be reliably interpreted, with a high degree of inter- and intrareader agreement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Costs to Our Patients. First-in-Human Total-Body PET/CT Imaging Using 89Zr-Labeled MUC5AC Antibody in a Patient with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Is the Clinical Application of CXCR4 Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Aldosteronism Really Happening? Reimagining Biologically Adapted Somatostatin Receptor-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Perspectives Based on Personal Experience and Observations on Recent Trials. Preclinical Evaluation of 226Ac as a Theranostic Agent: Imaging, Dosimetry, and Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1