基于三级医疗中心 10 年经验的主动脉髂闭塞症血管内治疗技术回顾:一项回顾性研究。

Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.3348/jksr.2023.0116
Panat Nisityotakul, Sorracha Rookkapan
{"title":"基于三级医疗中心 10 年经验的主动脉髂闭塞症血管内治疗技术回顾:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Panat Nisityotakul, Sorracha Rookkapan","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2023.0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the technical considerations of endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) based on a 10-year experience in Songklanagarind Hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 210 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for symptomatic AIOD between January 2010 and December 2020. The patients' clinical and lesion characteristics, including technical considerations of the procedure, were collected, analyzed, and stratified using the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (80%) in this study had chronic limb-threatening ischemia lesions, with an occlusion rate of 37%. The technical success rate of TASC C & D was lower than that of TASC A & B, 84.4% vs. 99.2% <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001. A technical success rate of 93.3% (14/15) was found for the femoral and brachial approach, compared with a success rate of 89.0% (57/64) for the unibifemoral approach in TASC C & D, without a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.076). However, the puncture site complications in this route were up to 17.6%, which is the highest rate compared with other techniques. These complications could be treated either conservatively or minimally invasively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cases of failed femoral access, simultaneous femoral and brachial approaches improved the technical success rate of endovascular recanalization of TASC C & D aortoiliac occlusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","volume":"85 3","pages":"596-606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"10년간의 3차 의료기관 경험을 바탕으로 한 대동맥장골동맥 폐색 질환 혈관내 치료의 기술적 고찰: 후향적 연구.\",\"authors\":\"Panat Nisityotakul, Sorracha Rookkapan\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/jksr.2023.0116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the technical considerations of endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) based on a 10-year experience in Songklanagarind Hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 210 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for symptomatic AIOD between January 2010 and December 2020. The patients' clinical and lesion characteristics, including technical considerations of the procedure, were collected, analyzed, and stratified using the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients (80%) in this study had chronic limb-threatening ischemia lesions, with an occlusion rate of 37%. The technical success rate of TASC C & D was lower than that of TASC A & B, 84.4% vs. 99.2% <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001. A technical success rate of 93.3% (14/15) was found for the femoral and brachial approach, compared with a success rate of 89.0% (57/64) for the unibifemoral approach in TASC C & D, without a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.076). However, the puncture site complications in this route were up to 17.6%, which is the highest rate compared with other techniques. These complications could be treated either conservatively or minimally invasively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In cases of failed femoral access, simultaneous femoral and brachial approaches improved the technical success rate of endovascular recanalization of TASC C & D aortoiliac occlusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"85 3\",\"pages\":\"596-606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据松克拉加林医院10年的经验,研究主动脉髂闭塞症(AIOD)血管内治疗的技术注意事项:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2010年1月至2020年12月期间接受血管内治疗的210例无症状主动脉髂闭塞症患者。收集、分析了患者的临床和病变特征,包括手术的技术考虑因素,并采用跨大西洋学会间共识(TASC)进行了分层:本研究中的大多数患者(80%)都有慢性肢体缺血病变,闭塞率为37%。TASC C 和 D 的技术成功率低于 TASC A 和 B,分别为 84.4% 和 99.2% P ≤ 0.001。股骨和肱动脉途径的技术成功率为 93.3%(14/15),而 TASC C 和 D 的单股动脉途径的成功率为 89.0%(57/64),两者差异无统计学意义(P = 0.076)。然而,该方法的穿刺部位并发症高达 17.6%,是其他方法中并发症发生率最高的。这些并发症可通过保守或微创方法治疗:结论:在股动脉入路失败的病例中,同时采用股动脉和肱动脉入路可提高TASC C和D主动脉髂骨闭塞症血管内再通术的技术成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
10년간의 3차 의료기관 경험을 바탕으로 한 대동맥장골동맥 폐색 질환 혈관내 치료의 기술적 고찰: 후향적 연구.

Purpose: To examine the technical considerations of endovascular treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) based on a 10-year experience in Songklanagarind Hospital.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 210 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for symptomatic AIOD between January 2010 and December 2020. The patients' clinical and lesion characteristics, including technical considerations of the procedure, were collected, analyzed, and stratified using the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC).

Results: Most patients (80%) in this study had chronic limb-threatening ischemia lesions, with an occlusion rate of 37%. The technical success rate of TASC C & D was lower than that of TASC A & B, 84.4% vs. 99.2% p ≤ 0.001. A technical success rate of 93.3% (14/15) was found for the femoral and brachial approach, compared with a success rate of 89.0% (57/64) for the unibifemoral approach in TASC C & D, without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.076). However, the puncture site complications in this route were up to 17.6%, which is the highest rate compared with other techniques. These complications could be treated either conservatively or minimally invasively.

Conclusion: In cases of failed femoral access, simultaneous femoral and brachial approaches improved the technical success rate of endovascular recanalization of TASC C & D aortoiliac occlusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Announcement of the Establishment of the 'Healthcare Policy' Section and Introduction of the New Section Editor]. [Annual Report of J Korean Soc Radiol in the 80th Korean Congress of Radiology, 2024]. [Medical Radiation Safety: Are We Doing It Right?] [Preface for Special Issue on Medical Policy and Radiology]. [Rules Regarding Special Medical Equipment and Exclusively Affiliated Radiologists in Korea].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1