单纯射频消融与先乙醇消融再射频消融治疗混合囊性和实性甲状腺结节的疗效和安全性比较》(The Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Radiofrequency Ablation Alone and Ethanol Ablation Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Mixed Cystic and Solid Thyroid Nodule)。

Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.3348/jksr.2023.0056
Min Gang Jo, Min Kyoung Lee, Jae Ho Shin, Min Guk Seo, So Lyung Jung
{"title":"单纯射频消融与先乙醇消融再射频消融治疗混合囊性和实性甲状腺结节的疗效和安全性比较》(The Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Radiofrequency Ablation Alone and Ethanol Ablation Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Mixed Cystic and Solid Thyroid Nodule)。","authors":"Min Gang Jo, Min Kyoung Lee, Jae Ho Shin, Min Guk Seo, So Lyung Jung","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2023.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ethanol ablation (EA) followed by RFA in treating mixed cystic and solid thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 243 nodules from 243 patients who underwent RFA for mixed cystic and solid benign nodules. The nodules were divided into two groups (RFA alone and EA + RFA). We evaluated volume reduction rate (VRR), therapeutic success rate, improvement in symptomatic and cosmetic issues, complications, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RFA group included 204 patients, and the EA + RFA group included 39 patients. The long-term success rates in the RFA only and EA + RFA groups were 90.2% and 97.4%, respectively. The mean VRR at the last follow-up in the RFA and EA + RFA groups were 81.6% and 87.2%, respectively. Therapeutic results were similar in both groups at the last follow-up. Cosmetic and symptomatic problems markedly improved in both groups. No major complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both RFA alone and EA + RA are safe and effective methods for treating mixed cystic and solid thyroid nodules, although EA + RFA is slightly more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":101329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","volume":"85 3","pages":"618-630"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Radiofrequency Ablation Alone and Ethanol Ablation Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Mixed Cystic and Solid Thyroid Nodule.\",\"authors\":\"Min Gang Jo, Min Kyoung Lee, Jae Ho Shin, Min Guk Seo, So Lyung Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/jksr.2023.0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ethanol ablation (EA) followed by RFA in treating mixed cystic and solid thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 243 nodules from 243 patients who underwent RFA for mixed cystic and solid benign nodules. The nodules were divided into two groups (RFA alone and EA + RFA). We evaluated volume reduction rate (VRR), therapeutic success rate, improvement in symptomatic and cosmetic issues, complications, and adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RFA group included 204 patients, and the EA + RFA group included 39 patients. The long-term success rates in the RFA only and EA + RFA groups were 90.2% and 97.4%, respectively. The mean VRR at the last follow-up in the RFA and EA + RFA groups were 81.6% and 87.2%, respectively. Therapeutic results were similar in both groups at the last follow-up. Cosmetic and symptomatic problems markedly improved in both groups. No major complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both RFA alone and EA + RA are safe and effective methods for treating mixed cystic and solid thyroid nodules, although EA + RFA is slightly more effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"85 3\",\"pages\":\"618-630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166582/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较射频消融术(RFA)和乙醇消融术(EA)治疗甲状腺囊性和实性混合结节的疗效和安全性:我们纳入了243名接受RFA治疗混合囊性和实性良性结节患者的243个结节。结节被分为两组(单纯 RFA 和 EA + RFA)。我们对体积缩小率(VRR)、治疗成功率、症状和外观问题的改善情况、并发症和不良反应进行了评估:结果:RFA 组包括 204 名患者,EA + RFA 组包括 39 名患者。RFA组和EA + RFA组的长期成功率分别为90.2%和97.4%。最后一次随访时,RFA 组和 EA + RFA 组的平均 VRR 分别为 81.6% 和 87.2%。最后一次随访时,两组的治疗效果相似。两组患者的外观和症状问题都有明显改善。结论单用RFA和EA+RA都是治疗甲状腺囊实性混合结节安全有效的方法,但EA+RFA的疗效稍好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Radiofrequency Ablation Alone and Ethanol Ablation Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Mixed Cystic and Solid Thyroid Nodule.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ethanol ablation (EA) followed by RFA in treating mixed cystic and solid thyroid nodules.

Materials and methods: We included 243 nodules from 243 patients who underwent RFA for mixed cystic and solid benign nodules. The nodules were divided into two groups (RFA alone and EA + RFA). We evaluated volume reduction rate (VRR), therapeutic success rate, improvement in symptomatic and cosmetic issues, complications, and adverse effects.

Results: The RFA group included 204 patients, and the EA + RFA group included 39 patients. The long-term success rates in the RFA only and EA + RFA groups were 90.2% and 97.4%, respectively. The mean VRR at the last follow-up in the RFA and EA + RFA groups were 81.6% and 87.2%, respectively. Therapeutic results were similar in both groups at the last follow-up. Cosmetic and symptomatic problems markedly improved in both groups. No major complications were observed.

Conclusion: Both RFA alone and EA + RA are safe and effective methods for treating mixed cystic and solid thyroid nodules, although EA + RFA is slightly more effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Announcement of the Establishment of the 'Healthcare Policy' Section and Introduction of the New Section Editor]. [Annual Report of J Korean Soc Radiol in the 80th Korean Congress of Radiology, 2024]. [Medical Radiation Safety: Are We Doing It Right?] [Preface for Special Issue on Medical Policy and Radiology]. [Rules Regarding Special Medical Equipment and Exclusively Affiliated Radiologists in Korea].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1