{"title":"临床虚弱量表对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后长期疗效的影响","authors":"Norihisa Miyawaki MD , Kenichi Ishizu MD , Shinichi Shirai MD , Katsunori Miyahara MD , Ko Yamamoto MD, PhD , Tomohiro Suenaga MD , Akira Otani MD, PhD , Kenji Nakano MD , Tadatomo Fukushima MD , Euihong Ko MD , Yasuo Tsuru MD , Miho Nakamura MD , Toru Morofuji MD , Takashi Morinaga MD , Masaomi Hayashi MD , Akihiro Isotani MD , Nobuhisa Ohno MD , Shinichi Kakumoto MD , Kenji Ando MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The semiquantitative Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is reportedly a useful marker for predicting short- and mid-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed the long-term prognostic impact of CFS in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We prospectively assessed patients undergoing TAVI in Kokura Memorial Hospital using a 9-level CFS and enrolled 1594 patients after excluding patients with CFS 8-9. The patients were divided into the low (CFS level, 1-3; N = 842), intermediate (4; N = 469), and high (5-7; N = 283) groups according to their CFS levels.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the low, intermediate, and high groups, 3-year all-cause mortality rates were 17.4%, 29.4%, and 41.7% (<em>P</em> < .001) and composite rates of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 12.1%, 19.1%, and 23.9% (<em>P</em> < .001), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that higher frailty was independently associated with all-cause mortality (intermediate group: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.15, <em>P</em> < .001; high group: adjusted HR, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.59-2.99, <em>P</em> < .001) and composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization (intermediate group: adjusted HR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.04-2.08, <em>P</em> = .030; high group: adjusted HR, 1.66, 95% CI, 1.09-2.51, <em>P</em> = .018) and this result was consistent, irrespective of stratification based on age, sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and New York Heart Association functional class without significant interaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The simple CFS tool predicts the long-term adverse outcomes post-TAVI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"275 ","pages":"Pages 141-150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the clinical frailty scale on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation\",\"authors\":\"Norihisa Miyawaki MD , Kenichi Ishizu MD , Shinichi Shirai MD , Katsunori Miyahara MD , Ko Yamamoto MD, PhD , Tomohiro Suenaga MD , Akira Otani MD, PhD , Kenji Nakano MD , Tadatomo Fukushima MD , Euihong Ko MD , Yasuo Tsuru MD , Miho Nakamura MD , Toru Morofuji MD , Takashi Morinaga MD , Masaomi Hayashi MD , Akihiro Isotani MD , Nobuhisa Ohno MD , Shinichi Kakumoto MD , Kenji Ando MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The semiquantitative Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is reportedly a useful marker for predicting short- and mid-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed the long-term prognostic impact of CFS in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We prospectively assessed patients undergoing TAVI in Kokura Memorial Hospital using a 9-level CFS and enrolled 1594 patients after excluding patients with CFS 8-9. The patients were divided into the low (CFS level, 1-3; N = 842), intermediate (4; N = 469), and high (5-7; N = 283) groups according to their CFS levels.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the low, intermediate, and high groups, 3-year all-cause mortality rates were 17.4%, 29.4%, and 41.7% (<em>P</em> < .001) and composite rates of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 12.1%, 19.1%, and 23.9% (<em>P</em> < .001), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that higher frailty was independently associated with all-cause mortality (intermediate group: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.15, <em>P</em> < .001; high group: adjusted HR, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.59-2.99, <em>P</em> < .001) and composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization (intermediate group: adjusted HR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.04-2.08, <em>P</em> = .030; high group: adjusted HR, 1.66, 95% CI, 1.09-2.51, <em>P</em> = .018) and this result was consistent, irrespective of stratification based on age, sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and New York Heart Association functional class without significant interaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The simple CFS tool predicts the long-term adverse outcomes post-TAVI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"275 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 141-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000287032400139X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000287032400139X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of the clinical frailty scale on long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Background
The semiquantitative Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is reportedly a useful marker for predicting short- and mid-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed the long-term prognostic impact of CFS in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI.
Methods
We prospectively assessed patients undergoing TAVI in Kokura Memorial Hospital using a 9-level CFS and enrolled 1594 patients after excluding patients with CFS 8-9. The patients were divided into the low (CFS level, 1-3; N = 842), intermediate (4; N = 469), and high (5-7; N = 283) groups according to their CFS levels.
Results
In the low, intermediate, and high groups, 3-year all-cause mortality rates were 17.4%, 29.4%, and 41.7% (P < .001) and composite rates of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization were 12.1%, 19.1%, and 23.9% (P < .001), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that higher frailty was independently associated with all-cause mortality (intermediate group: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.15, P < .001; high group: adjusted HR, 2.18, 95% CI, 1.59-2.99, P < .001) and composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization (intermediate group: adjusted HR, 1.47, 95% CI, 1.04-2.08, P = .030; high group: adjusted HR, 1.66, 95% CI, 1.09-2.51, P = .018) and this result was consistent, irrespective of stratification based on age, sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and New York Heart Association functional class without significant interaction.
Conclusions
The simple CFS tool predicts the long-term adverse outcomes post-TAVI.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.