将赤道距线作为桑德斯 3 型和 4 型钙基骨折及侧壁爆裂的影像学预测指标。

Jaclyn M Jankowski, Eric Boe, Kristen C R Combs, John C Thomas, David M Keller, Christian G Zapf, John M Yingling, Frank A Liporace, Richard S Yoon, Joshua R Langford
{"title":"将赤道距线作为桑德斯 3 型和 4 型钙基骨折及侧壁爆裂的影像学预测指标。","authors":"Jaclyn M Jankowski, Eric Boe, Kristen C R Combs, John C Thomas, David M Keller, Christian G Zapf, John M Yingling, Frank A Liporace, Richard S Yoon, Joshua R Langford","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the equatorial talar line (ETL) as a sensitive radiographic parameter to predict Sanders type III and IV fractures and the presence of lateral wall blowout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reliability of the ETL was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and receiver operating curve (ROC) to predict sensitivity. Using lateral ankle radiographs, raters determined whether the calcaneal tuberosity was \"above\" (predicting Sanders type I or II) or \"below\" (predicting Sanders type III or IV and lateral wall blowout).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In determining the \"above\" or \"below\" location of the ETL, the calculated ICC was 1.0 for each session. As a predictor of Sanders fracture classification type, the calculated ICC was 0.93 for the first session and 0.89 for the second session for an overall ICC of 0.91. As a predictor of Sanders fracture type, ROC analysis yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.82. As a predictor of lateral wall blowout, ROC analysis yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ETL is a reproducible radiographic parameter that can be reliably used to crudely predict between Sanders type I or II (ETL is \"above\") and Sanders type III or IV (ETL is \"below\") calcaneus fractures as well as the presence of lateral wall blowout.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Equatorial Talar Line as a Radiographic Predictor of Sanders Type 3 and 4 Calcaneus Fractures and Lateral Wall Blowout.\",\"authors\":\"Jaclyn M Jankowski, Eric Boe, Kristen C R Combs, John C Thomas, David M Keller, Christian G Zapf, John M Yingling, Frank A Liporace, Richard S Yoon, Joshua R Langford\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the equatorial talar line (ETL) as a sensitive radiographic parameter to predict Sanders type III and IV fractures and the presence of lateral wall blowout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reliability of the ETL was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and receiver operating curve (ROC) to predict sensitivity. Using lateral ankle radiographs, raters determined whether the calcaneal tuberosity was \\\"above\\\" (predicting Sanders type I or II) or \\\"below\\\" (predicting Sanders type III or IV and lateral wall blowout).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In determining the \\\"above\\\" or \\\"below\\\" location of the ETL, the calculated ICC was 1.0 for each session. As a predictor of Sanders fracture classification type, the calculated ICC was 0.93 for the first session and 0.89 for the second session for an overall ICC of 0.91. As a predictor of Sanders fracture type, ROC analysis yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.82. As a predictor of lateral wall blowout, ROC analysis yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ETL is a reproducible radiographic parameter that can be reliably used to crudely predict between Sanders type I or II (ETL is \\\"above\\\") and Sanders type III or IV (ETL is \\\"below\\\") calcaneus fractures as well as the presence of lateral wall blowout.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的方法:使用类内相关系数(ICC)和接收者操作曲线(ROC)评估ETL的可靠性,并预测其灵敏度:方法:使用类内相关系数(ICC)和接收者操作曲线(ROC)评估 ETL 的可靠性,以预测灵敏度。通过踝关节侧位X光片,评定者确定小方结节是在 "上方"(预测为桑德斯I型或II型)还是 "下方"(预测为桑德斯III型或IV型和侧壁塌陷):在确定 ETL 的 "上方 "或 "下方 "位置时,每次计算的 ICC 均为 1.0。作为桑德斯骨折分类类型的预测指标,计算得出的第一个疗程的 ICC 为 0.93,第二个疗程为 0.89,总 ICC 为 0.91。作为桑德斯骨折类型的预测指标,ROC 分析得出的总体灵敏度为 0.82。作为侧壁破裂的预测指标,ROC 分析得出的总体灵敏度为 0.81:结论:ETL是一个可重复的影像学参数,可用于粗略预测桑德斯I型或II型骨折(ETL位于 "上方")和桑德斯III型或IV型骨折(ETL位于 "下方"),以及是否存在侧壁塌陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using the Equatorial Talar Line as a Radiographic Predictor of Sanders Type 3 and 4 Calcaneus Fractures and Lateral Wall Blowout.

Objective: To assess the equatorial talar line (ETL) as a sensitive radiographic parameter to predict Sanders type III and IV fractures and the presence of lateral wall blowout.

Methods: Reliability of the ETL was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and receiver operating curve (ROC) to predict sensitivity. Using lateral ankle radiographs, raters determined whether the calcaneal tuberosity was "above" (predicting Sanders type I or II) or "below" (predicting Sanders type III or IV and lateral wall blowout).

Results: In determining the "above" or "below" location of the ETL, the calculated ICC was 1.0 for each session. As a predictor of Sanders fracture classification type, the calculated ICC was 0.93 for the first session and 0.89 for the second session for an overall ICC of 0.91. As a predictor of Sanders fracture type, ROC analysis yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.82. As a predictor of lateral wall blowout, ROC analysis yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.81.

Conclusion: The ETL is a reproducible radiographic parameter that can be reliably used to crudely predict between Sanders type I or II (ETL is "above") and Sanders type III or IV (ETL is "below") calcaneus fractures as well as the presence of lateral wall blowout.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Congenital Pseudoarthrosis of the Clavicle in a Softball Player. Comments on "Readability Analysis of Patient Education Material on Rotator Cuff Injuries From the Top 25 Ranking Orthopedic Institutions". Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Overused Among Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty? Sacral U-type Fractures in Patients Older Than 65 years. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Standard Posterior Approach for Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1