痴呆症专业护理人员道德自我效能量表的开发和初步验证。

Dementia (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1177/14713012241262833
Frederik Schou-Juul, Lucca-Mathilde Thorup Ferm, Ida Rübot Boje, Jens Elmelund Rise, Sofie Smedegaard Skov, Christian Ritz, Sigurd Lauridsen
{"title":"痴呆症专业护理人员道德自我效能量表的开发和初步验证。","authors":"Frederik Schou-Juul, Lucca-Mathilde Thorup Ferm, Ida Rübot Boje, Jens Elmelund Rise, Sofie Smedegaard Skov, Christian Ritz, Sigurd Lauridsen","doi":"10.1177/14713012241262833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a scale for measuring professional caregivers' ethical self-efficacy in dementia care.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional caregivers of people with dementia make ethical decisions on a day-to-day basis, and it is important that they feel confident when doing so. Moreover, confidence, or self-efficacy, influences caregivers' behaviour and well-being and may be a predictor of competence. However, there is no scale for measuring ethical self-efficacy. This study aims to fill this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study concerns the development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy (DemESE) scale. During development, we identified dementia-specific ethical principles and generated items representing ethical conflicts of principles. In the subsequent validation, we administered the scale to experts and professional caregivers in dementia care. We assessed the relevance of the scale using a content validity index and tested validity and reliability using Cronbach's alpha. To further enhance validity, we compared the scale with analogous self-efficacy scales using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quantitative testing of DemESE revealed that the scale exhibited acceptable levels of internal consistency and reliability. This finding was supported by Cronbach's alpha. In addition, the content validity index and Pearson correlation coefficient provided evidence of the scale's relevance and validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that DemESE is a promising tool for assessing professional caregivers' ethical self-efficacy in dementia care and may be used to measure ethical self-efficacy - that is, confidence in ethical decision-making in dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1036-1051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy scale for professional caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Frederik Schou-Juul, Lucca-Mathilde Thorup Ferm, Ida Rübot Boje, Jens Elmelund Rise, Sofie Smedegaard Skov, Christian Ritz, Sigurd Lauridsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14713012241262833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a scale for measuring professional caregivers' ethical self-efficacy in dementia care.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional caregivers of people with dementia make ethical decisions on a day-to-day basis, and it is important that they feel confident when doing so. Moreover, confidence, or self-efficacy, influences caregivers' behaviour and well-being and may be a predictor of competence. However, there is no scale for measuring ethical self-efficacy. This study aims to fill this gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study concerns the development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy (DemESE) scale. During development, we identified dementia-specific ethical principles and generated items representing ethical conflicts of principles. In the subsequent validation, we administered the scale to experts and professional caregivers in dementia care. We assessed the relevance of the scale using a content validity index and tested validity and reliability using Cronbach's alpha. To further enhance validity, we compared the scale with analogous self-efficacy scales using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quantitative testing of DemESE revealed that the scale exhibited acceptable levels of internal consistency and reliability. This finding was supported by Cronbach's alpha. In addition, the content validity index and Pearson correlation coefficient provided evidence of the scale's relevance and validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that DemESE is a promising tool for assessing professional caregivers' ethical self-efficacy in dementia care and may be used to measure ethical self-efficacy - that is, confidence in ethical decision-making in dementia care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1036-1051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241262833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241262833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发并验证一个量表,用于测量痴呆症护理中专业护理人员的伦理自我效能:背景:痴呆症患者的专业护理人员每天都要做出伦理决定,因此他们在做出决定时必须充满信心。此外,自信心或自我效能感会影响护理人员的行为和幸福感,并可预测其能力。然而,目前还没有衡量伦理自我效能感的量表。本研究旨在填补这一空白:本研究涉及痴呆症特定伦理自我效能感量表(DemESE)的开发和初步验证。在开发过程中,我们确定了痴呆症特有的伦理原则,并生成了代表伦理原则冲突的项目。在随后的验证中,我们对痴呆症护理方面的专家和专业护理人员实施了该量表。我们使用内容效度指数评估了量表的相关性,并使用 Cronbach's alpha 检验了效度和信度。为了进一步提高效度,我们使用皮尔逊相关系数将该量表与类似的自我效能感量表进行了比较:对 DemESE 的定量测试表明,该量表的内部一致性和可靠性都达到了可接受的水平。这一结果得到了 Cronbach's alpha 的支持。此外,内容效度指数和皮尔逊相关系数也证明了量表的相关性和有效性:研究结果表明,DemESE 是评估专业护理人员在痴呆症护理中的伦理自我效能感的一种有前途的工具,可用于测量伦理自我效能感,即在痴呆症护理中做出伦理决策的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy scale for professional caregivers.

Aim: To develop and validate a scale for measuring professional caregivers' ethical self-efficacy in dementia care.

Background: Professional caregivers of people with dementia make ethical decisions on a day-to-day basis, and it is important that they feel confident when doing so. Moreover, confidence, or self-efficacy, influences caregivers' behaviour and well-being and may be a predictor of competence. However, there is no scale for measuring ethical self-efficacy. This study aims to fill this gap.

Methods: This study concerns the development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy (DemESE) scale. During development, we identified dementia-specific ethical principles and generated items representing ethical conflicts of principles. In the subsequent validation, we administered the scale to experts and professional caregivers in dementia care. We assessed the relevance of the scale using a content validity index and tested validity and reliability using Cronbach's alpha. To further enhance validity, we compared the scale with analogous self-efficacy scales using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: The quantitative testing of DemESE revealed that the scale exhibited acceptable levels of internal consistency and reliability. This finding was supported by Cronbach's alpha. In addition, the content validity index and Pearson correlation coefficient provided evidence of the scale's relevance and validity.

Conclusion: The results suggest that DemESE is a promising tool for assessing professional caregivers' ethical self-efficacy in dementia care and may be used to measure ethical self-efficacy - that is, confidence in ethical decision-making in dementia care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the effectiveness and experiences of people living with dementia interacting with digital interventions: A mixed methods systematic review. A scoping review of dementia education programs to assess for the inclusion of culture. Evolving dementia care: An explorative study on the lived experience of older adults living with dementia in nursing homes using observational and biometric sensor data. Community health workers supporting diverse family caregivers of persons with dementia: Preliminary qualitative results from a randomized home-based study. Participation of persons living with dementia in research: A means to address epistemic injustice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1