模拟脐静脉导管置入的认知辅助和表现:随机试验

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Archives De Pediatrie Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2024.03.001
Audrey Mowendabeka , Philipe Bothorel , Thomas Lauvray , Marie Douchez , Laurent Fourcade , Antoine Bedu , Sophie Martinez , Vincent Guigonis , Laure Ponthier
{"title":"模拟脐静脉导管置入的认知辅助和表现:随机试验","authors":"Audrey Mowendabeka ,&nbsp;Philipe Bothorel ,&nbsp;Thomas Lauvray ,&nbsp;Marie Douchez ,&nbsp;Laurent Fourcade ,&nbsp;Antoine Bedu ,&nbsp;Sophie Martinez ,&nbsp;Vincent Guigonis ,&nbsp;Laure Ponthier","doi":"10.1016/j.arcped.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Neonatal resuscitation may require urgent umbilical venous catheter (UVC) placement. Complications can be observed with umbilical venous catheterization, especially in a stressful context. Inspired by the aeronautic environment, medical routine checklists, also called “cognitive aids,” secure the equipment and environment for the patients once they are admitted to the operating room. We hypothesized that reading a cognitive aid for UVC placement in the delivery room during neonatal resuscitation simulation scenarios can (a) improve the performance in reducing catheterization duration and (b) can limit complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective single-center randomized study. A total of 23 dyads for a simulation scenario were included: 12 in the control group and 11 in the cognitive aid group. In the cognitive aid group, the cognitive aid was read by the same facilitator for every scenario.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference concerning the duration of the procedure was identified between the cognitive aid and control groups: 412 s [342; 420] vs. 374 s [338;402], respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.781). Nevertheless, there were significantly fewer deviations from hygiene guidelines and improved prevention of air embolism in the cognitive aid group compared with the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The UVC insertion time was similar between the control and cognitive aid groups. Moreover, cognitive aid can limit infectious complications or air embolism by allowing caregivers to follow UVC placement standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55477,"journal":{"name":"Archives De Pediatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929693X24000824/pdfft?md5=e26d6031ab784553ad6fe1649a1a7e8b&pid=1-s2.0-S0929693X24000824-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive aid and performance for simulated umbilical venous catheter placement: A randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Mowendabeka ,&nbsp;Philipe Bothorel ,&nbsp;Thomas Lauvray ,&nbsp;Marie Douchez ,&nbsp;Laurent Fourcade ,&nbsp;Antoine Bedu ,&nbsp;Sophie Martinez ,&nbsp;Vincent Guigonis ,&nbsp;Laure Ponthier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arcped.2024.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Neonatal resuscitation may require urgent umbilical venous catheter (UVC) placement. Complications can be observed with umbilical venous catheterization, especially in a stressful context. Inspired by the aeronautic environment, medical routine checklists, also called “cognitive aids,” secure the equipment and environment for the patients once they are admitted to the operating room. We hypothesized that reading a cognitive aid for UVC placement in the delivery room during neonatal resuscitation simulation scenarios can (a) improve the performance in reducing catheterization duration and (b) can limit complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective single-center randomized study. A total of 23 dyads for a simulation scenario were included: 12 in the control group and 11 in the cognitive aid group. In the cognitive aid group, the cognitive aid was read by the same facilitator for every scenario.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference concerning the duration of the procedure was identified between the cognitive aid and control groups: 412 s [342; 420] vs. 374 s [338;402], respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.781). Nevertheless, there were significantly fewer deviations from hygiene guidelines and improved prevention of air embolism in the cognitive aid group compared with the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The UVC insertion time was similar between the control and cognitive aid groups. Moreover, cognitive aid can limit infectious complications or air embolism by allowing caregivers to follow UVC placement standards.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives De Pediatrie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929693X24000824/pdfft?md5=e26d6031ab784553ad6fe1649a1a7e8b&pid=1-s2.0-S0929693X24000824-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives De Pediatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929693X24000824\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives De Pediatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929693X24000824","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:新生儿复苏可能需要紧急放置脐静脉导管(UVC)。脐静脉导管置入术可能会出现并发症,尤其是在紧张的情况下。受航空环境的启发,医疗常规检查单(也称为 "认知辅助工具")可确保患者进入手术室后的设备和环境安全。我们假设,在新生儿复苏模拟场景中,在产房阅读用于放置紫外线导管的认知辅助工具可(a)提高缩短导管插入时间的性能,(b)限制并发症的发生:这是一项前瞻性单中心随机研究。方法:这是一项前瞻性的单中心随机研究:对照组 12 人,认知辅助组 11 人。在认知辅助组中,每个场景的认知辅助都由同一位主持人宣读:认知辅助组和对照组的程序持续时间无明显差异:分别为 412 秒 [342; 420] 对 374 秒 [338; 402] (p = 0.781)。尽管如此,与对照组相比,认知辅助组偏离卫生指南的情况明显减少,预防空气栓塞的效果也有所改善:结论:对照组和认知辅助组的紫外线插入时间相似。结论:对照组和认知辅助组的紫外线插入时间相似。此外,认知辅助可使护理人员遵循紫外线放置标准,从而减少感染并发症或空气栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive aid and performance for simulated umbilical venous catheter placement: A randomized trial

Introduction

Neonatal resuscitation may require urgent umbilical venous catheter (UVC) placement. Complications can be observed with umbilical venous catheterization, especially in a stressful context. Inspired by the aeronautic environment, medical routine checklists, also called “cognitive aids,” secure the equipment and environment for the patients once they are admitted to the operating room. We hypothesized that reading a cognitive aid for UVC placement in the delivery room during neonatal resuscitation simulation scenarios can (a) improve the performance in reducing catheterization duration and (b) can limit complications.

Methods

This was a prospective single-center randomized study. A total of 23 dyads for a simulation scenario were included: 12 in the control group and 11 in the cognitive aid group. In the cognitive aid group, the cognitive aid was read by the same facilitator for every scenario.

Results

No significant difference concerning the duration of the procedure was identified between the cognitive aid and control groups: 412 s [342; 420] vs. 374 s [338;402], respectively (p = 0.781). Nevertheless, there were significantly fewer deviations from hygiene guidelines and improved prevention of air embolism in the cognitive aid group compared with the control group.

Conclusion

The UVC insertion time was similar between the control and cognitive aid groups. Moreover, cognitive aid can limit infectious complications or air embolism by allowing caregivers to follow UVC placement standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives De Pediatrie
Archives De Pediatrie 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
24.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives de Pédiatrie publishes in English original Research papers, Review articles, Short communications, Practice guidelines, Editorials and Letters in all fields relevant to pediatrics. Eight issues of Archives de Pédiatrie are released annually, as well as supplementary and special editions to complete these regular issues. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. Archives de Pédiatrie is the official publication of the French Society of Pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: Abundant literature, low certainty of evidence for clinicians. A decisive step in supporting transgender youth in France. Keeping schools open during the emergence of the COVID-19 alpha variant: Impact on the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 among children during the 2020-2021 school year: Epidemiology of COVID-19 in children and adolescents during the 2020-2021 school year in France. Care for newborns and its diverse meanings. Early detection of neonatal sepsis and reduction of overall antibiotic exposure: Towards precision medicine: Early detection of neonatal sepsis and reduction of overall antibiotic exposure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1