深度转型的深度实验--低收入家庭作为新能源系统的参与和社会技术变革的场所

IF 5.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2024.100865
Gisle Solbu, Marianne Ryghaug, Tomas M. Skjølsvold, Sara Heidenreich, Robert Næss
{"title":"深度转型的深度实验--低收入家庭作为新能源系统的参与和社会技术变革的场所","authors":"Gisle Solbu,&nbsp;Marianne Ryghaug,&nbsp;Tomas M. Skjølsvold,&nbsp;Sara Heidenreich,&nbsp;Robert Næss","doi":"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper links the literature on energy poverty and energy vulnerability with the experimental focus of current energy transition initiatives and argues for the need to expand household experimentation beyond technology adoption. Drawing on an analysis of low-income households’ energy using practices we develop a framework consisting of three key dynamics, 1) predictability – flexibility, 2) sufficiency – efficiency and 3) activation – exploitation. The dynamics prompt a discussion on how conventional demand-side tools, such as pricing schemes and technology implementation programs, can be adapted to better suit the needs of vulnerable households. Additionally, they showcase the possibility of experimenting with new and innovative ways to bring about more radical change, e.g. sufficiency experiments and revitalising “forgotten” practices. We argue that the framework can serve as an empirically grounded basis for designing deeper and more socially just and needs-oriented household energy experiments needed for sustainability transitions to become successful.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54294,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100865"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400056X/pdfft?md5=dfa09581e8b8f11641d85f9617a75837&pid=1-s2.0-S221042242400056X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep experiments for deep transitions – low-income households as sites of participation and socio-technical change in new energy systems\",\"authors\":\"Gisle Solbu,&nbsp;Marianne Ryghaug,&nbsp;Tomas M. Skjølsvold,&nbsp;Sara Heidenreich,&nbsp;Robert Næss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eist.2024.100865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper links the literature on energy poverty and energy vulnerability with the experimental focus of current energy transition initiatives and argues for the need to expand household experimentation beyond technology adoption. Drawing on an analysis of low-income households’ energy using practices we develop a framework consisting of three key dynamics, 1) predictability – flexibility, 2) sufficiency – efficiency and 3) activation – exploitation. The dynamics prompt a discussion on how conventional demand-side tools, such as pricing schemes and technology implementation programs, can be adapted to better suit the needs of vulnerable households. Additionally, they showcase the possibility of experimenting with new and innovative ways to bring about more radical change, e.g. sufficiency experiments and revitalising “forgotten” practices. We argue that the framework can serve as an empirically grounded basis for designing deeper and more socially just and needs-oriented household energy experiments needed for sustainability transitions to become successful.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400056X/pdfft?md5=dfa09581e8b8f11641d85f9617a75837&pid=1-s2.0-S221042242400056X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400056X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221042242400056X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将有关能源贫困和能源脆弱性的文献与当前能源转型倡议的实验重点联系起来,并认为有必要将家庭实验扩展到技术采用之外。通过对低收入家庭能源使用实践的分析,我们建立了一个由三个关键动态组成的框架:1)可预测性--灵活性;2)充足性--效率;3)激活--利用。这些动态促使我们讨论如何调整传统的需求方工具,如定价方案和技术实施计划,以更好地满足弱势家庭的需求。此外,它们还展示了尝试新的创新方法以实现更彻底变革的可能性,如充足性实验和振兴 "被遗忘 "的做法。我们认为,该框架可以作为设计更深入、更符合社会公正和需求导向的家庭能源实验的经验基础,这些实验是可持续发展转型取得成功所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep experiments for deep transitions – low-income households as sites of participation and socio-technical change in new energy systems

This paper links the literature on energy poverty and energy vulnerability with the experimental focus of current energy transition initiatives and argues for the need to expand household experimentation beyond technology adoption. Drawing on an analysis of low-income households’ energy using practices we develop a framework consisting of three key dynamics, 1) predictability – flexibility, 2) sufficiency – efficiency and 3) activation – exploitation. The dynamics prompt a discussion on how conventional demand-side tools, such as pricing schemes and technology implementation programs, can be adapted to better suit the needs of vulnerable households. Additionally, they showcase the possibility of experimenting with new and innovative ways to bring about more radical change, e.g. sufficiency experiments and revitalising “forgotten” practices. We argue that the framework can serve as an empirically grounded basis for designing deeper and more socially just and needs-oriented household energy experiments needed for sustainability transitions to become successful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions serves as a platform for reporting studies on innovations and socio-economic transitions aimed at fostering an environmentally sustainable economy, thereby addressing structural resource scarcity and environmental challenges, particularly those associated with fossil energy use and climate change. The journal focuses on various forms of innovation, including technological, organizational, economic, institutional, and political, as well as economy-wide and sectoral changes in areas such as energy, transport, agriculture, and water management. It endeavors to tackle complex questions concerning social, economic, behavioral-psychological, and political barriers and opportunities, along with their intricate interactions. With a multidisciplinary approach and methodological openness, the journal welcomes contributions from a wide array of disciplines within the social, environmental, and innovation sciences.
期刊最新文献
Cross-sector collaboration, nonprofit readiness, and sustainability transitions Navigating sustainable transition processes at the local level: The case of Energy Island Bornholm The dynamics of change towards sustainability in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana's Waste-to-Energy transition Ideas behind transformative innovation policy: Economists confronting missions and sustainability transition in Finland Hibernation of off-grid solar e-waste in Kenya: An unintended response to an emerging waste issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1