在巴西人口中验证嗅觉障碍问卷(QOD)

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100414
Amanda Beatriz Costa da Silva Bernardino , Márcio Andrade Barreto-Filho , Amanda Savieto Pompeu , Jaqueline dos Santos Andrade , Amanda Canário Andrade Azevedo , Michelle Queiroz Aguiar Brasil , Mariana Cedro , Cintia Araújo , Nilvano Andrade , Kevan Akrami , Henrique Ochoa Scussiatto , Viviane Sampaio Boaventura , Marco Aurélio Fornazieri
{"title":"在巴西人口中验证嗅觉障碍问卷(QOD)","authors":"Amanda Beatriz Costa da Silva Bernardino ,&nbsp;Márcio Andrade Barreto-Filho ,&nbsp;Amanda Savieto Pompeu ,&nbsp;Jaqueline dos Santos Andrade ,&nbsp;Amanda Canário Andrade Azevedo ,&nbsp;Michelle Queiroz Aguiar Brasil ,&nbsp;Mariana Cedro ,&nbsp;Cintia Araújo ,&nbsp;Nilvano Andrade ,&nbsp;Kevan Akrami ,&nbsp;Henrique Ochoa Scussiatto ,&nbsp;Viviane Sampaio Boaventura ,&nbsp;Marco Aurélio Fornazieri","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The incidence of olfactory disorders has increased in recent years, mainly related to COVID-19 infection. In Brazil, over 37 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported, and approximately 10 % of those cases continue to experience olfactory disorders for more than one month. Despite the significant negative impact on well-being, there is currently no validated instrument to assess how olfactory disorders impact the quality of life in Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to validate the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) for Brazilian Portuguese.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors first performed translation, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, psychometric evaluation and cultural adaptation of the English version of the questionnaire. To assure linguistic and conceptual equivalence of the translated questionnaire, 126 participants from two Brazilian states and varying degrees of olfactory loss answered the QOD and the World Health Organization Quality of Life bref (WHOQOL-bref) questionnaires. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®) was used to quantify the olfactory loss. Furthermore, to evaluate the reliability of the Portuguese version a test-retest was performed on a subgroup of patients. The authors observed a high Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.86) for internal consistency of the quality of Life (QOD-QOL) statements.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>As expected, there was a negative correlation between QOD-QOL and UPSIT® (Spearman's ρ = -0.275, <em>p</em> = 0.002), since QOL score increases and UPSIT® score decreases with worsening of olfactory function. Correlations were moderate between QOD-QOL and WHOQOL-bref mean (Spearman's ρ = -0.374, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and weak to moderate between the QOD-QOL and Visual Analog Scale of the QOD regarding professional life, leisure, and private life (Spearman's ρ = -0.316, <em>p</em> = 0.000; Spearman's ρ = -0.293, <em>p</em> = 0.001; Spearman's ρ = -0.261, <em>p</em> = 0.004; respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In conclusion, the authors have demonstrated a high internal consistency and validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the QOD for evaluating the quality of life in individuals with olfactory disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224000917/pdfft?md5=4f44d33de43893866146e5435443d235&pid=1-s2.0-S1807593224000917-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders (QOD) for the Brazilian population\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Beatriz Costa da Silva Bernardino ,&nbsp;Márcio Andrade Barreto-Filho ,&nbsp;Amanda Savieto Pompeu ,&nbsp;Jaqueline dos Santos Andrade ,&nbsp;Amanda Canário Andrade Azevedo ,&nbsp;Michelle Queiroz Aguiar Brasil ,&nbsp;Mariana Cedro ,&nbsp;Cintia Araújo ,&nbsp;Nilvano Andrade ,&nbsp;Kevan Akrami ,&nbsp;Henrique Ochoa Scussiatto ,&nbsp;Viviane Sampaio Boaventura ,&nbsp;Marco Aurélio Fornazieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The incidence of olfactory disorders has increased in recent years, mainly related to COVID-19 infection. In Brazil, over 37 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported, and approximately 10 % of those cases continue to experience olfactory disorders for more than one month. Despite the significant negative impact on well-being, there is currently no validated instrument to assess how olfactory disorders impact the quality of life in Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to validate the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) for Brazilian Portuguese.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The authors first performed translation, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, psychometric evaluation and cultural adaptation of the English version of the questionnaire. To assure linguistic and conceptual equivalence of the translated questionnaire, 126 participants from two Brazilian states and varying degrees of olfactory loss answered the QOD and the World Health Organization Quality of Life bref (WHOQOL-bref) questionnaires. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®) was used to quantify the olfactory loss. Furthermore, to evaluate the reliability of the Portuguese version a test-retest was performed on a subgroup of patients. The authors observed a high Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.86) for internal consistency of the quality of Life (QOD-QOL) statements.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>As expected, there was a negative correlation between QOD-QOL and UPSIT® (Spearman's ρ = -0.275, <em>p</em> = 0.002), since QOL score increases and UPSIT® score decreases with worsening of olfactory function. Correlations were moderate between QOD-QOL and WHOQOL-bref mean (Spearman's ρ = -0.374, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and weak to moderate between the QOD-QOL and Visual Analog Scale of the QOD regarding professional life, leisure, and private life (Spearman's ρ = -0.316, <em>p</em> = 0.000; Spearman's ρ = -0.293, <em>p</em> = 0.001; Spearman's ρ = -0.261, <em>p</em> = 0.004; respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In conclusion, the authors have demonstrated a high internal consistency and validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the QOD for evaluating the quality of life in individuals with olfactory disorders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224000917/pdfft?md5=4f44d33de43893866146e5435443d235&pid=1-s2.0-S1807593224000917-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224000917\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224000917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景近年来,嗅觉障碍的发病率有所上升,主要与 COVID-19 感染有关。在巴西,已报告的 COVID-19 感染病例超过 3700 万例,其中约 10% 的病例持续出现嗅觉障碍超过一个月。本研究旨在验证巴西葡萄牙语版嗅觉障碍问卷(QOD)。方法作者首先对英文版问卷进行了翻译、回译、专家评审、预试、心理测量评估和文化适应性调整。为了确保翻译后的问卷在语言和概念上的等效性,来自巴西两个州的 126 名不同程度嗅觉缺失的参与者回答了 QOD 和世界卫生组织生活质量调查问卷(WHOQOL-bref)。宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试 (UPSIT®) 用于量化嗅觉损失。此外,为了评估葡萄牙语版本的可靠性,还对一部分患者进行了重测。研究结果正如预期的那样,QOD-QOL 和 UPSIT® 之间存在负相关(Spearman's ρ = -0.275,p = 0.002),因为随着嗅觉功能的恶化,QOL 分数会增加,而 UPSIT® 分数会降低。QOD-QOL 与 WHOQOL-bref 平均值之间存在中度相关性(Spearman's ρ = -0.374,p < 0.001),QOD-QOL 与 QOD 视觉模拟量表之间在职业生活、休闲和私人生活方面存在弱到中度相关性(Spearman's ρ = -0.316,p = 0.000;Spearman's ρ = -0.结论综上所述,作者证明了巴西葡萄牙语版 QOD 在评估嗅觉障碍患者生活质量方面具有较高的内部一致性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders (QOD) for the Brazilian population

Background

The incidence of olfactory disorders has increased in recent years, mainly related to COVID-19 infection. In Brazil, over 37 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported, and approximately 10 % of those cases continue to experience olfactory disorders for more than one month. Despite the significant negative impact on well-being, there is currently no validated instrument to assess how olfactory disorders impact the quality of life in Brazil.

Objectives

This study aimed to validate the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) for Brazilian Portuguese.

Methods

The authors first performed translation, back-translation, expert review, pre-testing, psychometric evaluation and cultural adaptation of the English version of the questionnaire. To assure linguistic and conceptual equivalence of the translated questionnaire, 126 participants from two Brazilian states and varying degrees of olfactory loss answered the QOD and the World Health Organization Quality of Life bref (WHOQOL-bref) questionnaires. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®) was used to quantify the olfactory loss. Furthermore, to evaluate the reliability of the Portuguese version a test-retest was performed on a subgroup of patients. The authors observed a high Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.86) for internal consistency of the quality of Life (QOD-QOL) statements.

Findings

As expected, there was a negative correlation between QOD-QOL and UPSIT® (Spearman's ρ = -0.275, p = 0.002), since QOL score increases and UPSIT® score decreases with worsening of olfactory function. Correlations were moderate between QOD-QOL and WHOQOL-bref mean (Spearman's ρ = -0.374, p < 0.001) and weak to moderate between the QOD-QOL and Visual Analog Scale of the QOD regarding professional life, leisure, and private life (Spearman's ρ = -0.316, p = 0.000; Spearman's ρ = -0.293, p = 0.001; Spearman's ρ = -0.261, p = 0.004; respectively).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the authors have demonstrated a high internal consistency and validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the QOD for evaluating the quality of life in individuals with olfactory disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
期刊最新文献
IMP3, CDK4, MDM2 and β-catenin expression in Enchondroma and Central Chondrosarcoma: Diagnostic and prognostic utility. Demographic characteristics and clinical-radiological correlation in patients with indications for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A cross-sectional study. Intraoperative changes of surgical approach and a second surgery after percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Assessment of body composition by dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry in renal transplant patients, hemodialysis patients, and a control group of healthy subjects. Liver biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease predicts no impact on antiviral response in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1