2021 年美国成年人中电子烟营销接触与吸食尼古丁和大麻之间的关系

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108090
Julia Chen-Sankey , Kathryn La Capria , Allison Glasser , Alisa A. Padon , Meghan B. Moran , Kimberly G. Wagoner , Kristina M. Jackson , Carla J. Berg
{"title":"2021 年美国成年人中电子烟营销接触与吸食尼古丁和大麻之间的关系","authors":"Julia Chen-Sankey ,&nbsp;Kathryn La Capria ,&nbsp;Allison Glasser ,&nbsp;Alisa A. Padon ,&nbsp;Meghan B. Moran ,&nbsp;Kimberly G. Wagoner ,&nbsp;Kristina M. Jackson ,&nbsp;Carla J. Berg","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Little is known about the influence of e-cigarette marketing on cannabis vaping behaviors. This study examined the associations between e-cigarette marketing exposure and nicotine and cannabis vaping among adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study included a U.S. nationally representative sample of adults from the Wave 6 survey of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. We used multinomial logistic regressions to examine the associations between past 30-day e-cigarette marketing exposure and past 30-day vaping behavior (sole- and dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis) overall and stratified by age.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 52.0 % of respondents reported e-cigarette marketing exposure, and 89.8 %, 5.6 %, 3.2 %, and 1.4 % reported no vaping, sole-nicotine vaping, sole-cannabis vaping, and dual-vaping, respectively. E-cigarette marketing exposure was associated with increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping versus no vaping (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.31; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.57) and dual-vaping versus no vaping (aRR, 1.26; 95 % CI, 1.01–1.57). This association was found among those aged 18–24 and 25–34 years. It was also associated with increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping versus sole-nicotine vaping (aRR, 1.28; 95 % CI, 1.04–1.58). This association was found among those aged 18–24 years.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>E-cigarette marketing exposure was associated with sole-cannabis vaping and dual-vaping, not sole-nicotine vaping among U.S. adults. Such associations were mainly driven by young adults aged 18–24 and 25–34 years. Greater restrictions on tobacco marketing may have reduced the influence of e-cigarette marketing on nicotine vaping, while gaps in marketing restrictions for cannabis may contribute to e-cigarette marketing influence on cannabis vaping.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001394/pdfft?md5=e0493031430d6fe4363527bf058304ea&pid=1-s2.0-S0306460324001394-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between e-cigarette marketing exposure and vaping nicotine and cannabis among U.S. adults, 2021\",\"authors\":\"Julia Chen-Sankey ,&nbsp;Kathryn La Capria ,&nbsp;Allison Glasser ,&nbsp;Alisa A. Padon ,&nbsp;Meghan B. Moran ,&nbsp;Kimberly G. Wagoner ,&nbsp;Kristina M. Jackson ,&nbsp;Carla J. Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Little is known about the influence of e-cigarette marketing on cannabis vaping behaviors. This study examined the associations between e-cigarette marketing exposure and nicotine and cannabis vaping among adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study included a U.S. nationally representative sample of adults from the Wave 6 survey of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. We used multinomial logistic regressions to examine the associations between past 30-day e-cigarette marketing exposure and past 30-day vaping behavior (sole- and dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis) overall and stratified by age.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 52.0 % of respondents reported e-cigarette marketing exposure, and 89.8 %, 5.6 %, 3.2 %, and 1.4 % reported no vaping, sole-nicotine vaping, sole-cannabis vaping, and dual-vaping, respectively. E-cigarette marketing exposure was associated with increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping versus no vaping (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.31; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.57) and dual-vaping versus no vaping (aRR, 1.26; 95 % CI, 1.01–1.57). This association was found among those aged 18–24 and 25–34 years. It was also associated with increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping versus sole-nicotine vaping (aRR, 1.28; 95 % CI, 1.04–1.58). This association was found among those aged 18–24 years.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>E-cigarette marketing exposure was associated with sole-cannabis vaping and dual-vaping, not sole-nicotine vaping among U.S. adults. Such associations were mainly driven by young adults aged 18–24 and 25–34 years. Greater restrictions on tobacco marketing may have reduced the influence of e-cigarette marketing on nicotine vaping, while gaps in marketing restrictions for cannabis may contribute to e-cigarette marketing influence on cannabis vaping.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001394/pdfft?md5=e0493031430d6fe4363527bf058304ea&pid=1-s2.0-S0306460324001394-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001394\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言人们对电子烟营销对吸食大麻行为的影响知之甚少。这项研究考察了成年人中电子烟营销接触与尼古丁和吸食大麻之间的关联。方法这项横断面研究包括来自烟草与健康人口评估研究第 6 波调查的美国全国代表性成年人样本。我们使用多叉逻辑回归法研究了过去 30 天的电子烟营销接触与过去 30 天的吸食行为(吸食尼古丁和大麻的单一吸食和双重吸食)之间的总体关联,并按年龄进行了分层。结果总体而言,52.0% 的受访者报告了电子烟营销接触,89.8%、5.6%、3.2% 和 1.4% 的受访者分别报告了未吸食、吸食尼古丁、吸食大麻和双重吸食。相对于不吸食电子烟(调整风险比[aRR],1.31;95%置信区间[CI],1.09-1.57)和双重吸食电子烟(aRR,1.26;95%置信区间[CI],1.01-1.57),电子烟营销接触与报告只吸食大麻的几率增加有关。在 18-24 岁和 25-34 岁的人群中发现了这种关联。报告只吸食大麻与只吸食尼古丁的几率增加也与此有关(aRR,1.28;95 % CI,1.04-1.58)。讨论在美国成年人中,卷烟营销接触与吸食单一大麻和吸食双重大麻有关,而与吸食单一尼古丁无关。这种关联主要是由 18-24 岁和 25-34 岁的年轻成年人引起的。加大对烟草营销的限制可能会减少电子烟营销对吸食尼古丁的影响,而大麻营销限制方面的差距可能会助长电子烟营销对吸食大麻的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between e-cigarette marketing exposure and vaping nicotine and cannabis among U.S. adults, 2021

Introduction

Little is known about the influence of e-cigarette marketing on cannabis vaping behaviors. This study examined the associations between e-cigarette marketing exposure and nicotine and cannabis vaping among adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included a U.S. nationally representative sample of adults from the Wave 6 survey of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. We used multinomial logistic regressions to examine the associations between past 30-day e-cigarette marketing exposure and past 30-day vaping behavior (sole- and dual-vaping of nicotine and cannabis) overall and stratified by age.

Results

Overall, 52.0 % of respondents reported e-cigarette marketing exposure, and 89.8 %, 5.6 %, 3.2 %, and 1.4 % reported no vaping, sole-nicotine vaping, sole-cannabis vaping, and dual-vaping, respectively. E-cigarette marketing exposure was associated with increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping versus no vaping (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.31; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.57) and dual-vaping versus no vaping (aRR, 1.26; 95 % CI, 1.01–1.57). This association was found among those aged 18–24 and 25–34 years. It was also associated with increased odds of reporting sole-cannabis vaping versus sole-nicotine vaping (aRR, 1.28; 95 % CI, 1.04–1.58). This association was found among those aged 18–24 years.

Discussion

E-cigarette marketing exposure was associated with sole-cannabis vaping and dual-vaping, not sole-nicotine vaping among U.S. adults. Such associations were mainly driven by young adults aged 18–24 and 25–34 years. Greater restrictions on tobacco marketing may have reduced the influence of e-cigarette marketing on nicotine vaping, while gaps in marketing restrictions for cannabis may contribute to e-cigarette marketing influence on cannabis vaping.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
From individual motivation to substance use initiation: A longitudinal cohort study assessing the associations between reward sensitivity and subsequent risk of substance use initiation among US adolescents Similarities and differences in core symptoms of problematic smartphone use among Chinese students enrolled in grades 4 to 9: A large national cross-sectional study Online social support and problematic Internet Use—a meta-analysis Adult attachment, social anxiety, and problematic social media use: A meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation model Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1