人工智能引导:在人工智能引导的可视化分析中引导信任、偏见和数据探索

IF 2.7 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Computer Graphics Forum Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1111/cgf.15108
Sunwoo Ha, Shayan Monadjemi, Alvitta Ottley
{"title":"人工智能引导:在人工智能引导的可视化分析中引导信任、偏见和数据探索","authors":"Sunwoo Ha,&nbsp;Shayan Monadjemi,&nbsp;Alvitta Ottley","doi":"10.1111/cgf.15108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (<i><span>AI</span></i>) in visual analytics (<i><span>VA</span></i>) tools raises vital questions about the behavior of users, their trust, and the potential of induced biases when provided with guidance during data exploration. We present an experiment where participants engaged in a visual data exploration task while receiving intelligent suggestions supplemented with four different transparency levels. We also modulated the difficulty of the task (easy or hard) to simulate a more tedious scenario for the analyst. Our results indicate that participants were more inclined to accept suggestions when completing a more difficult task despite the <i><span>ai</span></i>'s lower suggestion accuracy. Moreover, the levels of transparency tested in this study did not significantly affect suggestion usage or subjective trust ratings of the participants. Additionally, we observed that participants who utilized suggestions throughout the task explored a greater quantity and diversity of data points. We discuss these findings and the implications of this research for improving the design and effectiveness of <i><span>ai</span></i>-guided <i><span>va</span></i> tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":10687,"journal":{"name":"Computer Graphics Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guided By AI: Navigating Trust, Bias, and Data Exploration in AI-Guided Visual Analytics\",\"authors\":\"Sunwoo Ha,&nbsp;Shayan Monadjemi,&nbsp;Alvitta Ottley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cgf.15108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (<i><span>AI</span></i>) in visual analytics (<i><span>VA</span></i>) tools raises vital questions about the behavior of users, their trust, and the potential of induced biases when provided with guidance during data exploration. We present an experiment where participants engaged in a visual data exploration task while receiving intelligent suggestions supplemented with four different transparency levels. We also modulated the difficulty of the task (easy or hard) to simulate a more tedious scenario for the analyst. Our results indicate that participants were more inclined to accept suggestions when completing a more difficult task despite the <i><span>ai</span></i>'s lower suggestion accuracy. Moreover, the levels of transparency tested in this study did not significantly affect suggestion usage or subjective trust ratings of the participants. Additionally, we observed that participants who utilized suggestions throughout the task explored a greater quantity and diversity of data points. We discuss these findings and the implications of this research for improving the design and effectiveness of <i><span>ai</span></i>-guided <i><span>va</span></i> tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Graphics Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Graphics Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.15108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Graphics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.15108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)在可视化分析(VA)工具中的集成度越来越高,这引发了有关用户行为、用户信任度以及在数据探索过程中提供指导时可能诱发偏差的重要问题。我们进行了一项实验,让参与者在参与可视化数据探索任务的同时,接受辅以四种不同透明度级别的智能建议。我们还调节了任务的难度(简单或困难),以模拟对分析师来说更乏味的场景。我们的结果表明,尽管人工智能建议的准确率较低,但参与者在完成难度较高的任务时更倾向于接受建议。此外,本研究中测试的透明度水平并未对建议的使用或参与者的主观信任度产生显著影响。此外,我们还观察到,在整个任务过程中使用建议的参与者探索了更多和更多样化的数据点。我们将讨论这些发现以及本研究对改进人工智能引导的虚拟工具的设计和有效性的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guided By AI: Navigating Trust, Bias, and Data Exploration in AI-Guided Visual Analytics

The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in visual analytics (VA) tools raises vital questions about the behavior of users, their trust, and the potential of induced biases when provided with guidance during data exploration. We present an experiment where participants engaged in a visual data exploration task while receiving intelligent suggestions supplemented with four different transparency levels. We also modulated the difficulty of the task (easy or hard) to simulate a more tedious scenario for the analyst. Our results indicate that participants were more inclined to accept suggestions when completing a more difficult task despite the ai's lower suggestion accuracy. Moreover, the levels of transparency tested in this study did not significantly affect suggestion usage or subjective trust ratings of the participants. Additionally, we observed that participants who utilized suggestions throughout the task explored a greater quantity and diversity of data points. We discuss these findings and the implications of this research for improving the design and effectiveness of ai-guided va tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Graphics Forum
Computer Graphics Forum 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Graphics Forum is the official journal of Eurographics, published in cooperation with Wiley-Blackwell, and is a unique, international source of information for computer graphics professionals interested in graphics developments worldwide. It is now one of the leading journals for researchers, developers and users of computer graphics in both commercial and academic environments. The journal reports on the latest developments in the field throughout the world and covers all aspects of the theory, practice and application of computer graphics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Hierarchical Spherical Cross-Parameterization for Deforming Characters Deep SVBRDF Acquisition and Modelling: A Survey EBPVis: Visual Analytics of Economic Behavior Patterns in a Virtual Experimental Environment Mix-Max: A Content-Aware Operator for Real-Time Texture Transitions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1