患者对在家中过夜进行睡眠障碍诊断评估的既定偏好。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep and Breathing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1007/s11325-024-03080-7
Marcel Braun, S Dietz-Terjung, U Sommer, C Schoebel, C Heiser
{"title":"患者对在家中过夜进行睡眠障碍诊断评估的既定偏好。","authors":"Marcel Braun, S Dietz-Terjung, U Sommer, C Schoebel, C Heiser","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03080-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnostic workup for assessment of sleep disorders commonly involves overnight testing to assess sleep patterns and pathological events. So far, little is known about preferences for provision of home sleep tests to patients with sleep disorders. This study aims to close this gap by eliciting preferences for home sleep testing using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DCE with seven attributes of at-home sleep testing and three levels per attribute was developed using a fractional factorial design. Patients with and without previous sleep testing experience were recruited from two large sleep centers in Germany. Coefficients for attribute levels were calculated using a conditional logit model to estimate their influence on choice decisions and calculate the relative importance of each attribute.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>305 patients (54.5 ± 13,1 years, 65.3% male) were enrolled, and 288 surveys with complete data included for analysis. Attributes with greatest relevance were Waiting time to discuss sleep study results; Waiting time to conduct sleep study, and Sleep quality during measurement. Of lowest importance was Diagnostic accuracy of sleep study, followed by Effort to apply sleep study device. Significant heterogeneity in choice behavior was found, including differences by gender, willingness-to-pay for sleep studies, and previous experience with sleep studies. Preferred location for conducting sleep testing was at-home in 50.7% and in-lab in 46.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preferences and relative importance of home sleep test attributes vary among different subgroups. Considering those preferences can be important for clinicians and policymakers when designing care pathways and planning of testing policies for sleep disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":" ","pages":"1939-1949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stated patient preferences for overnight at-home diagnostic assessment of sleep disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Marcel Braun, S Dietz-Terjung, U Sommer, C Schoebel, C Heiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-024-03080-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnostic workup for assessment of sleep disorders commonly involves overnight testing to assess sleep patterns and pathological events. So far, little is known about preferences for provision of home sleep tests to patients with sleep disorders. This study aims to close this gap by eliciting preferences for home sleep testing using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DCE with seven attributes of at-home sleep testing and three levels per attribute was developed using a fractional factorial design. Patients with and without previous sleep testing experience were recruited from two large sleep centers in Germany. Coefficients for attribute levels were calculated using a conditional logit model to estimate their influence on choice decisions and calculate the relative importance of each attribute.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>305 patients (54.5 ± 13,1 years, 65.3% male) were enrolled, and 288 surveys with complete data included for analysis. Attributes with greatest relevance were Waiting time to discuss sleep study results; Waiting time to conduct sleep study, and Sleep quality during measurement. Of lowest importance was Diagnostic accuracy of sleep study, followed by Effort to apply sleep study device. Significant heterogeneity in choice behavior was found, including differences by gender, willingness-to-pay for sleep studies, and previous experience with sleep studies. Preferred location for conducting sleep testing was at-home in 50.7% and in-lab in 46.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preferences and relative importance of home sleep test attributes vary among different subgroups. Considering those preferences can be important for clinicians and policymakers when designing care pathways and planning of testing policies for sleep disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1939-1949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449966/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03080-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03080-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估睡眠障碍的诊断工作通常包括通宵测试,以评估睡眠模式和病理事件。迄今为止,人们对睡眠障碍患者进行家庭睡眠测试的偏好知之甚少。本研究旨在通过离散选择实验(DCE)激发人们对家庭睡眠测试的偏好,从而弥补这一空白:方法:本研究采用分数因子设计开发了一个包含七种家庭睡眠测试属性的离散选择实验(DCE),每种属性有三个等级。从德国两家大型睡眠中心招募了有过和没有过睡眠测试经验的患者。使用条件对数模型计算属性水平的系数,以估计其对选择决定的影响,并计算每个属性的相对重要性:共有 305 名患者(54.5 ± 13.1 岁,65.3% 为男性)参与了调查,其中有 288 份调查数据完整,可供分析。最重要的属性是讨论睡眠研究结果的等待时间、进行睡眠研究的等待时间和测量期间的睡眠质量。重要性最低的是睡眠检查的诊断准确性,其次是使用睡眠检查设备所花费的精力。在选择行为中发现了显著的异质性,包括性别差异、对睡眠检查的支付意愿以及以往的睡眠检查经验。50.7%的人首选在家进行睡眠测试,46.9%的人选择在实验室进行睡眠测试:结论:不同亚群对家庭睡眠测试属性的偏好和相对重要性各不相同。临床医生和政策制定者在设计护理路径和规划睡眠障碍测试政策时,考虑这些偏好可能非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stated patient preferences for overnight at-home diagnostic assessment of sleep disorders.

Purpose: The diagnostic workup for assessment of sleep disorders commonly involves overnight testing to assess sleep patterns and pathological events. So far, little is known about preferences for provision of home sleep tests to patients with sleep disorders. This study aims to close this gap by eliciting preferences for home sleep testing using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Methods: A DCE with seven attributes of at-home sleep testing and three levels per attribute was developed using a fractional factorial design. Patients with and without previous sleep testing experience were recruited from two large sleep centers in Germany. Coefficients for attribute levels were calculated using a conditional logit model to estimate their influence on choice decisions and calculate the relative importance of each attribute.

Results: 305 patients (54.5 ± 13,1 years, 65.3% male) were enrolled, and 288 surveys with complete data included for analysis. Attributes with greatest relevance were Waiting time to discuss sleep study results; Waiting time to conduct sleep study, and Sleep quality during measurement. Of lowest importance was Diagnostic accuracy of sleep study, followed by Effort to apply sleep study device. Significant heterogeneity in choice behavior was found, including differences by gender, willingness-to-pay for sleep studies, and previous experience with sleep studies. Preferred location for conducting sleep testing was at-home in 50.7% and in-lab in 46.9%.

Conclusions: Preferences and relative importance of home sleep test attributes vary among different subgroups. Considering those preferences can be important for clinicians and policymakers when designing care pathways and planning of testing policies for sleep disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep and Breathing
Sleep and Breathing 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep. Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
期刊最新文献
Long-term mortality risk in obstructive sleep apnea: the critical role of oxygen desaturation index. Prevalence of poor sleep quality during menopause: a meta-analysis. The association between sleep quantity, insomnia and lung cancer risk - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of snoring on the risk of stroke in patients with diabetes mellitus. Neuroticism affects nightmare distress through rumination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1