{"title":"在严重症状性低钠血症中使用高渗盐水;英国内分泌专家全国调查的结果。","authors":"Muhammad Fahad Arshad, Ahmed Iqbal","doi":"10.1007/s12020-024-03927-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe symptomatic hyponatraemia is potentially life-threatening and hypertonic saline (HTS) is effective at rapidly correcting serum sodium. Several clinical guidelines have aimed to standardise the administration of HTS. However, evidence supporting the guidelines is limited, and concerns have been raised regarding the potential for overcorrection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the practices and perceptions surrounding HTS use in severe symptomatic hyponatraemia among United Kingdom (UK) endocrinologists and trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was disseminated to Society for Endocrinology (UK) clinical members between 24/10/2023 and 30/11/2023 using a web-based multiple-choice questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 133 responses with a survey response rate of 8.3% (60.1% consultants, 33.1% trainees, 6.8% others). 85% of respondents employed bolus treatment with HTS only, with 9.8% using both bolus and continuous infusions. Most (53.2%) preferred 150 mL boluses, followed by 100 mL boluses (19.8%), while 5.5% of respondents used weight-based dosage. Commonly used HTS strengths were 2.7% (45.1%), followed by 1.8% (31.6%), while the 3% HTS strength recommended in guidelines was used by 21.8%. Contrary to guidelines, 78.6% did not administer a second bolus without waiting for the sodium result after the first bolus. Moreover, 86% have experience using venous blood gas sodium readings for monitoring. Overcorrection targets defined by 10 and 8 mmol/24 h cut-offs were used by 48.9% and 39.9%, respectively. For definite or anticipated overcorrection, 75.9% preferred 5% dextrose, while 40.6% had experience with desmopressin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variation exists in HTS use for severe symptomatic hyponatraemia in the UK. Most clinicians prefer a more cautious approach in administering HTS. These data offer insight into real-life care and call for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":"1199-1201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of hypertonic saline in severe symptomatic hyponatraemia; results from a national survey of endocrinologists in the United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Fahad Arshad, Ahmed Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12020-024-03927-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe symptomatic hyponatraemia is potentially life-threatening and hypertonic saline (HTS) is effective at rapidly correcting serum sodium. Several clinical guidelines have aimed to standardise the administration of HTS. However, evidence supporting the guidelines is limited, and concerns have been raised regarding the potential for overcorrection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the practices and perceptions surrounding HTS use in severe symptomatic hyponatraemia among United Kingdom (UK) endocrinologists and trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online survey was disseminated to Society for Endocrinology (UK) clinical members between 24/10/2023 and 30/11/2023 using a web-based multiple-choice questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 133 responses with a survey response rate of 8.3% (60.1% consultants, 33.1% trainees, 6.8% others). 85% of respondents employed bolus treatment with HTS only, with 9.8% using both bolus and continuous infusions. Most (53.2%) preferred 150 mL boluses, followed by 100 mL boluses (19.8%), while 5.5% of respondents used weight-based dosage. Commonly used HTS strengths were 2.7% (45.1%), followed by 1.8% (31.6%), while the 3% HTS strength recommended in guidelines was used by 21.8%. Contrary to guidelines, 78.6% did not administer a second bolus without waiting for the sodium result after the first bolus. Moreover, 86% have experience using venous blood gas sodium readings for monitoring. Overcorrection targets defined by 10 and 8 mmol/24 h cut-offs were used by 48.9% and 39.9%, respectively. For definite or anticipated overcorrection, 75.9% preferred 5% dextrose, while 40.6% had experience with desmopressin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variation exists in HTS use for severe symptomatic hyponatraemia in the UK. Most clinicians prefer a more cautious approach in administering HTS. These data offer insight into real-life care and call for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1199-1201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-03927-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-03927-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Use of hypertonic saline in severe symptomatic hyponatraemia; results from a national survey of endocrinologists in the United Kingdom.
Background: Severe symptomatic hyponatraemia is potentially life-threatening and hypertonic saline (HTS) is effective at rapidly correcting serum sodium. Several clinical guidelines have aimed to standardise the administration of HTS. However, evidence supporting the guidelines is limited, and concerns have been raised regarding the potential for overcorrection.
Objective: To assess the practices and perceptions surrounding HTS use in severe symptomatic hyponatraemia among United Kingdom (UK) endocrinologists and trainees.
Methods: An anonymous online survey was disseminated to Society for Endocrinology (UK) clinical members between 24/10/2023 and 30/11/2023 using a web-based multiple-choice questionnaire.
Results: We received 133 responses with a survey response rate of 8.3% (60.1% consultants, 33.1% trainees, 6.8% others). 85% of respondents employed bolus treatment with HTS only, with 9.8% using both bolus and continuous infusions. Most (53.2%) preferred 150 mL boluses, followed by 100 mL boluses (19.8%), while 5.5% of respondents used weight-based dosage. Commonly used HTS strengths were 2.7% (45.1%), followed by 1.8% (31.6%), while the 3% HTS strength recommended in guidelines was used by 21.8%. Contrary to guidelines, 78.6% did not administer a second bolus without waiting for the sodium result after the first bolus. Moreover, 86% have experience using venous blood gas sodium readings for monitoring. Overcorrection targets defined by 10 and 8 mmol/24 h cut-offs were used by 48.9% and 39.9%, respectively. For definite or anticipated overcorrection, 75.9% preferred 5% dextrose, while 40.6% had experience with desmopressin.
Conclusion: Significant variation exists in HTS use for severe symptomatic hyponatraemia in the UK. Most clinicians prefer a more cautious approach in administering HTS. These data offer insight into real-life care and call for future research.
期刊介绍:
Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology.
Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted.
Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.