使用 Phantom® 髓内钉系统进行改良 Lapidus 关节固定术治疗足外翻的中期疗效。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.001
{"title":"使用 Phantom® 髓内钉系统进行改良 Lapidus 关节固定术治疗足外翻的中期疗效。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Lapidus arthrodesis is one of the most commonly used techniques in the correction of moderate and severe </span>hallux valgus. We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes after using the Phantom® Lapidus intramedullary nail to find an effective technique with low complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We retrospectively analyzed data of 52 patients who underwent a modified Lapidus arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail at our center from November 2019 to September 2022. The mean follow-up period was 27 (range, 18–34) months. Clinical results were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the European Foot and Ankle Society score (EFAS) and the American </span>Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS); three different radiological measures were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean AOFAS score increased from 44.8 to 82 points. The mean EFAS score increased from 11.2 to 20.1 points. The mean VAS score decreased by 4.7 points. The mean EFAS Sport score was increased from 9.2 (SD 4.6) to 12.6 (SD 5.4) points. The intermetatarsal angle decreased from 15° to 6.9° and the hallux valgus angle by a mean of 17.9°. The forefoot<span> width reduced from 93.6 to 84.7 mm. All results were statistically significant (p &lt; .001). One case of nonunion was recorded. No implant-related complications were observed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This device was effective in correcting moderate to severe hallux valgus, with significant patient satisfaction. Its complication rate was not higher than that of other fixation devices. Correct compression of the arthrodesis, absence of extraosseous material, and multidirectional stability are important qualities of this implant for the correct treatment of this pathology.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV, retrospective case series</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midterm outcomes of the modified Lapidus arthrodesis using the Phantom® Intramedullary Nail System for the treatment of hallux valgus\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fas.2024.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Lapidus arthrodesis is one of the most commonly used techniques in the correction of moderate and severe </span>hallux valgus. We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes after using the Phantom® Lapidus intramedullary nail to find an effective technique with low complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We retrospectively analyzed data of 52 patients who underwent a modified Lapidus arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail at our center from November 2019 to September 2022. The mean follow-up period was 27 (range, 18–34) months. Clinical results were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the European Foot and Ankle Society score (EFAS) and the American </span>Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS); three different radiological measures were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean AOFAS score increased from 44.8 to 82 points. The mean EFAS score increased from 11.2 to 20.1 points. The mean VAS score decreased by 4.7 points. The mean EFAS Sport score was increased from 9.2 (SD 4.6) to 12.6 (SD 5.4) points. The intermetatarsal angle decreased from 15° to 6.9° and the hallux valgus angle by a mean of 17.9°. The forefoot<span> width reduced from 93.6 to 84.7 mm. All results were statistically significant (p &lt; .001). One case of nonunion was recorded. No implant-related complications were observed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This device was effective in correcting moderate to severe hallux valgus, with significant patient satisfaction. Its complication rate was not higher than that of other fixation devices. Correct compression of the arthrodesis, absence of extraosseous material, and multidirectional stability are important qualities of this implant for the correct treatment of this pathology.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV, retrospective case series</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773124001048\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773124001048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Lapidus关节置换术是矫正中度和重度拇指外翻最常用的技术之一。我们分析了使用 Phantom® Lapidus 髓内钉后的临床和放射学结果,以找到一种并发症少的有效技术:我们回顾性分析了2019年11月至2022年9月在本中心接受改良Lapidus髓内钉关节置换术的52名患者的数据。平均随访时间为 27 个月(18-34 个月)。临床结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、欧洲足踝协会评分(EFAS)和美国骨科足踝协会评分(AOFAS)进行评估,并对三种不同的放射学指标进行了分析:结果:AOFAS 的平均得分从 44.8 分上升到 82 分。EFAS平均得分从11.2分上升到20.1分。VAS 平均得分降低了 4.7 分。平均 EFAS 运动得分从 9.2 分(标准差 4.6 分)增加到 12.6 分(标准差 5.4 分)。跖骨间角度从 15°减小到 6.9°,拇指外翻角度平均减小了 17.9°。前足宽度从 93.6 毫米减少到 84.7 毫米。所有结果均具有统计学意义(P 结论:该装置可有效矫正中度足外翻:该装置能有效矫正中度至重度的足外翻,患者满意度很高。其并发症发生率并不比其他固定装置高。关节固定的正确压迫、无骨外材料和多向稳定性是该假体正确治疗该病症的重要品质:证据级别:IV级,回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Midterm outcomes of the modified Lapidus arthrodesis using the Phantom® Intramedullary Nail System for the treatment of hallux valgus

Background

Lapidus arthrodesis is one of the most commonly used techniques in the correction of moderate and severe hallux valgus. We analyzed the clinical and radiological outcomes after using the Phantom® Lapidus intramedullary nail to find an effective technique with low complications.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of 52 patients who underwent a modified Lapidus arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail at our center from November 2019 to September 2022. The mean follow-up period was 27 (range, 18–34) months. Clinical results were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the European Foot and Ankle Society score (EFAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS); three different radiological measures were analyzed.

Results

The mean AOFAS score increased from 44.8 to 82 points. The mean EFAS score increased from 11.2 to 20.1 points. The mean VAS score decreased by 4.7 points. The mean EFAS Sport score was increased from 9.2 (SD 4.6) to 12.6 (SD 5.4) points. The intermetatarsal angle decreased from 15° to 6.9° and the hallux valgus angle by a mean of 17.9°. The forefoot width reduced from 93.6 to 84.7 mm. All results were statistically significant (p < .001). One case of nonunion was recorded. No implant-related complications were observed.

Conclusions

This device was effective in correcting moderate to severe hallux valgus, with significant patient satisfaction. Its complication rate was not higher than that of other fixation devices. Correct compression of the arthrodesis, absence of extraosseous material, and multidirectional stability are important qualities of this implant for the correct treatment of this pathology.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective case series

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing the speed of correction speed of distal tibial valgus deformity in children with percutaneous epiphyseodesis using transphyseal screw. Innovative surgical treatment of tarsal coalition in flatfoot: Resection and interposition of synthetic membrane, flexible bioresorbable polymers film, as adhesion barrier and subtalar arthroeresis. Up to nine years follow-up. The health economics of orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. Automatic Hardy and Clapham's classification of hallux sesamoid position on foot radiographs using deep neural network. Favorable change in patient-reported outcomes following peroneus longus to brevis tendon transfer and lateral ankle ligament reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1