针对难治性精神分裂症的心理和社会心理干预:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。

IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Lancet Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00136-6
Nurul Husna Salahuddin, Alexandra Schütz, Gabi Pitschel-Walz, Susanna Franziska Mayer, Anna Chaimani, Spyridon Siafis, Josef Priller, Stefan Leucht, Irene Bighelli
{"title":"针对难治性精神分裂症的心理和社会心理干预:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Nurul Husna Salahuddin, Alexandra Schütz, Gabi Pitschel-Walz, Susanna Franziska Mayer, Anna Chaimani, Spyridon Siafis, Josef Priller, Stefan Leucht, Irene Bighelli","doi":"10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00136-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with schizophrenia have symptoms that do not respond to antipsychotics. This condition is called treatment-resistant schizophrenia and has not received specific attention as opposed to general schizophrenia. Psychological and psychosocial interventions as an add-on treatment to pharmacotherapy could be useful, but their role and comparative efficacy to each other and to standard care in this population are not known. We investigated the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of psychological and psychosocial interventions for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we searched for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) through a systematic database search in BIOSIS, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for articles published from inception up to Jan 31, 2020. We also searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group registry for studies published from inception up to March 31, 2022, and PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies published from inception up to July 31, 2023. We included RCTs that included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The primary outcome was overall symptoms. We did random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and NMAs to calculate standardised mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios with 95% CIs. No people with lived experience were involved throughout the research process. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022358696.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 30 326 records, excluding 24 526 by title and abstract screening. 5762 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 5540 were excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria, and 222 reports corresponding to 60 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 52 RCTs with 5034 participants (1654 [33·2%] females and 3325 [66·8%] males with sex indicated) comparing 20 psychological and psychosocial interventions provided data for the NMA. Mean age of participants was 38·05 years (range 23·10-48·50). We aimed to collect ethnicity data, but they were scarcely reported. According to the quality of evidence, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp; SMD -0·22, 95% CI -0·35 to -0·09, 35 trials), virtual reality intervention (SMD -0·41, -0·79 to -0·02, four trials), integrated intervention (SMD -0·70, -1·18 to -0·22, three trials), and music therapy (SMD -1·27, -1·83 to -0·70, one study) were more efficacious than standard care in reducing overall symptoms. No indication of publication bias was identified.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We provide robust findings that CBTp can reduce the overall symptoms of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and therefore clinicians can prioritise this intervention in their clinical practice. Other psychological and psychosocial interventions showed promising results but need further investigation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>DAAD-ASFE.</p>","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":"11 7","pages":"545-553"},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological and psychosocial interventions for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nurul Husna Salahuddin, Alexandra Schütz, Gabi Pitschel-Walz, Susanna Franziska Mayer, Anna Chaimani, Spyridon Siafis, Josef Priller, Stefan Leucht, Irene Bighelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00136-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with schizophrenia have symptoms that do not respond to antipsychotics. This condition is called treatment-resistant schizophrenia and has not received specific attention as opposed to general schizophrenia. Psychological and psychosocial interventions as an add-on treatment to pharmacotherapy could be useful, but their role and comparative efficacy to each other and to standard care in this population are not known. We investigated the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of psychological and psychosocial interventions for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we searched for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) through a systematic database search in BIOSIS, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for articles published from inception up to Jan 31, 2020. We also searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group registry for studies published from inception up to March 31, 2022, and PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies published from inception up to July 31, 2023. We included RCTs that included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The primary outcome was overall symptoms. We did random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and NMAs to calculate standardised mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios with 95% CIs. No people with lived experience were involved throughout the research process. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022358696.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 30 326 records, excluding 24 526 by title and abstract screening. 5762 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 5540 were excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria, and 222 reports corresponding to 60 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 52 RCTs with 5034 participants (1654 [33·2%] females and 3325 [66·8%] males with sex indicated) comparing 20 psychological and psychosocial interventions provided data for the NMA. Mean age of participants was 38·05 years (range 23·10-48·50). We aimed to collect ethnicity data, but they were scarcely reported. According to the quality of evidence, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp; SMD -0·22, 95% CI -0·35 to -0·09, 35 trials), virtual reality intervention (SMD -0·41, -0·79 to -0·02, four trials), integrated intervention (SMD -0·70, -1·18 to -0·22, three trials), and music therapy (SMD -1·27, -1·83 to -0·70, one study) were more efficacious than standard care in reducing overall symptoms. No indication of publication bias was identified.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We provide robust findings that CBTp can reduce the overall symptoms of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and therefore clinicians can prioritise this intervention in their clinical practice. Other psychological and psychosocial interventions showed promising results but need further investigation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>DAAD-ASFE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"11 7\",\"pages\":\"545-553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":30.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00136-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00136-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多精神分裂症患者的症状对抗精神病药物无效。这种情况被称为耐药性精神分裂症,与普通精神分裂症相比,尚未受到特别关注。心理和社会心理干预作为药物治疗的附加治疗可能会有所帮助,但它们在这一人群中的作用、相互之间的疗效比较以及与标准治疗的疗效比较尚不清楚。我们研究了心理和社会心理干预对耐药精神分裂症患者的疗效、可接受性和耐受性:在这项系统性综述和网络荟萃分析(NMA)中,我们通过系统性数据库检索,在 BIOSIS、CINAHL、Embase、LILACS、MEDLINE、PsychInfo、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台中检索了已发表和未发表的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时间从开始至 2020 年 1 月 31 日。我们还检索了 Cochrane 精神分裂症小组注册表中从开始至 2022 年 3 月 31 日发表的研究,以及 PubMed 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 中从开始至 2023 年 7 月 31 日发表的研究。我们纳入了包括耐药性精神分裂症患者在内的 RCT 研究。主要研究结果为总体症状。我们进行了随机效应配对荟萃分析和NMA分析,以计算标准化均值差异(SMD)或风险比及95% CI。在整个研究过程中,没有任何有生活经验的人参与其中。研究方案已在 PROSPERO 注册,编号为 CRD42022358696:我们确定了 30 326 条记录,通过标题和摘要筛选排除了 24 526 条记录。对 5762 篇全文文章进行了资格评估,其中 5540 篇文章因不符合资格标准而被排除,60 项研究的 222 份报告被纳入定性综合。其中,52 项 RCT 共 5034 名参与者(1654 名[33-2%]女性和 3325 名[66-8%]男性,标明性别)比较了 20 项心理和社会心理干预措施,为 NMA 提供了数据。参与者的平均年龄为 38-05 岁(23-10-48-50 岁不等)。我们的目标是收集种族数据,但报告的种族数据很少。根据证据质量,认知行为疗法(CBTp;SMD -0-22,95% CI -0-35至-0-09,35项试验)、虚拟现实干预(SMD -0-41,-0-79至-0-02,4项试验)、综合干预(SMD -0-70,-1-18至-0-22,3项试验)和音乐疗法(SMD -1-27,-1-83至-0-70,1项研究)在减轻总体症状方面比标准护理更有效。没有发现发表偏倚的迹象:我们提供的可靠研究结果表明,CBT 可减轻耐药精神分裂症患者的总体症状,因此临床医生可在临床实践中优先考虑这一干预措施。其他心理和社会心理干预措施也显示出良好的效果,但仍需进一步研究:DAAD-ASFE.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychological and psychosocial interventions for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Many patients with schizophrenia have symptoms that do not respond to antipsychotics. This condition is called treatment-resistant schizophrenia and has not received specific attention as opposed to general schizophrenia. Psychological and psychosocial interventions as an add-on treatment to pharmacotherapy could be useful, but their role and comparative efficacy to each other and to standard care in this population are not known. We investigated the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of psychological and psychosocial interventions for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we searched for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) through a systematic database search in BIOSIS, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for articles published from inception up to Jan 31, 2020. We also searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group registry for studies published from inception up to March 31, 2022, and PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies published from inception up to July 31, 2023. We included RCTs that included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The primary outcome was overall symptoms. We did random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and NMAs to calculate standardised mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios with 95% CIs. No people with lived experience were involved throughout the research process. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022358696.

Findings: We identified 30 326 records, excluding 24 526 by title and abstract screening. 5762 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 5540 were excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria, and 222 reports corresponding to 60 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 52 RCTs with 5034 participants (1654 [33·2%] females and 3325 [66·8%] males with sex indicated) comparing 20 psychological and psychosocial interventions provided data for the NMA. Mean age of participants was 38·05 years (range 23·10-48·50). We aimed to collect ethnicity data, but they were scarcely reported. According to the quality of evidence, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp; SMD -0·22, 95% CI -0·35 to -0·09, 35 trials), virtual reality intervention (SMD -0·41, -0·79 to -0·02, four trials), integrated intervention (SMD -0·70, -1·18 to -0·22, three trials), and music therapy (SMD -1·27, -1·83 to -0·70, one study) were more efficacious than standard care in reducing overall symptoms. No indication of publication bias was identified.

Interpretation: We provide robust findings that CBTp can reduce the overall symptoms of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and therefore clinicians can prioritise this intervention in their clinical practice. Other psychological and psychosocial interventions showed promising results but need further investigation.

Funding: DAAD-ASFE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Psychiatry
Lancet Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
58.30
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Practice and policy Correction to Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11: 1012–21 Are global estimates of minimally adequate treatment for major depressive disorder based on minimally adequate data? Psychological interventions to prevent depression: a cause for hope Psychiatry and nephrology partnering to improve quality of care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1