龈切除术研究趋势的文献计量学网络分析和可视化。

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S470234
Marius Marcello Utomo Koerniadi, Fatimah Maria Tadjoedin, Dimas Ilham Hutomo, Ette Soraya S Tadjoedin, Muhammad Ihsan Rizal, Benso Sulijaya
{"title":"龈切除术研究趋势的文献计量学网络分析和可视化。","authors":"Marius Marcello Utomo Koerniadi, Fatimah Maria Tadjoedin, Dimas Ilham Hutomo, Ette Soraya S Tadjoedin, Muhammad Ihsan Rizal, Benso Sulijaya","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S470234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gingivectomy has been the preferred method since the findings in 1884. It evolved from \"blind\" subgingival scaling to \"the excision of the soft tissue\". The use of these techniques is no longer mandatory in clinical situations; therefore, researchers have searched for numerous publications that have been registered regarding gingivectomy. This research aims to fill the niche area by assessing more about gingivectomy and it's trend among the periodontology topic of discussion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive and analytical observation by evaluating the result of the VOS viewer mapping and calculation throughout the bibliographic data from publications obtained from SCOPUS in July 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are 660 publications from six types of publication. Related keywords are compiled and visualized by network mapping. There is a significant gap among the contributing countries in the number of documents and number of citations per journal. However, a minimal gap is seen in other objectives, such as authors, journals, and institutions on their contribution towards the publication of gingivectomy topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A total of 660 of 1914 articles were included in the analysis after the filtering process, and these articles were cited 5910 times, with an average of 9 citations per article.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometric Network Analysis and Visualization of Research Trends in Gingivectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Marius Marcello Utomo Koerniadi, Fatimah Maria Tadjoedin, Dimas Ilham Hutomo, Ette Soraya S Tadjoedin, Muhammad Ihsan Rizal, Benso Sulijaya\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CCIDE.S470234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gingivectomy has been the preferred method since the findings in 1884. It evolved from \\\"blind\\\" subgingival scaling to \\\"the excision of the soft tissue\\\". The use of these techniques is no longer mandatory in clinical situations; therefore, researchers have searched for numerous publications that have been registered regarding gingivectomy. This research aims to fill the niche area by assessing more about gingivectomy and it's trend among the periodontology topic of discussion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive and analytical observation by evaluating the result of the VOS viewer mapping and calculation throughout the bibliographic data from publications obtained from SCOPUS in July 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are 660 publications from six types of publication. Related keywords are compiled and visualized by network mapping. There is a significant gap among the contributing countries in the number of documents and number of citations per journal. However, a minimal gap is seen in other objectives, such as authors, journals, and institutions on their contribution towards the publication of gingivectomy topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A total of 660 of 1914 articles were included in the analysis after the filtering process, and these articles were cited 5910 times, with an average of 9 citations per article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S470234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S470234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自 1884 年发现以来,龈切除术一直是首选方法。它从 "盲目 "龈下刮治发展到 "切除软组织"。在临床上,这些技术的使用已不再是强制性的;因此,研究人员搜索了大量有关龈切除术的文献。本研究旨在填补这一空白领域,更多地评估牙龈切除术及其在牙周病学讨论主题中的趋势:方法:通过对2022年7月从SCOPUS获得的出版物书目数据中的VOS查看器映射和计算结果进行评估,进行描述性和分析性观察:结果:共有来自六类出版物的 660 篇出版物。通过网络映射对相关关键词进行了汇编和可视化。在文献数量和每种期刊的引用次数方面,各国之间存在明显差距。然而,在其他目标方面,如作者、期刊和机构对龈镊切除术主题发表的贡献方面,差距很小:经过筛选后,共有 1914 篇文章中的 660 篇被纳入分析,这些文章被引用了 5910 次,平均每篇文章被引用 9 次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bibliometric Network Analysis and Visualization of Research Trends in Gingivectomy.

Background: Gingivectomy has been the preferred method since the findings in 1884. It evolved from "blind" subgingival scaling to "the excision of the soft tissue". The use of these techniques is no longer mandatory in clinical situations; therefore, researchers have searched for numerous publications that have been registered regarding gingivectomy. This research aims to fill the niche area by assessing more about gingivectomy and it's trend among the periodontology topic of discussion.

Methods: Descriptive and analytical observation by evaluating the result of the VOS viewer mapping and calculation throughout the bibliographic data from publications obtained from SCOPUS in July 2022.

Results: There are 660 publications from six types of publication. Related keywords are compiled and visualized by network mapping. There is a significant gap among the contributing countries in the number of documents and number of citations per journal. However, a minimal gap is seen in other objectives, such as authors, journals, and institutions on their contribution towards the publication of gingivectomy topics.

Conclusion: A total of 660 of 1914 articles were included in the analysis after the filtering process, and these articles were cited 5910 times, with an average of 9 citations per article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Novel Nano-Hydroxyapatite Agarose-Based Hydrogel for Biomimetic Remineralization of Demineralized Human Enamel: An in-vitro Study. Enhancing Communication Between Dental Laboratories and Clinics: The Role of Information Technology Systems in a Developing Country. The Correlation Between Odontogenic Infection and Total Spectrum of Dental Caries with Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Children with Intellectual Disabilities. User Insights into Fake Snap-on Veneers: Perceptions and Experiences. A Retrospective Evaluation of Mandibular Fracture in Kabul, Afghanistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1