甲状腺结节:过去、现在和未来。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.eprac.2024.05.016
Alan A. Parsa MD, FACE , Hossein Gharib MD, MACP, MACE
{"title":"甲状腺结节:过去、现在和未来。","authors":"Alan A. Parsa MD, FACE ,&nbsp;Hossein Gharib MD, MACP, MACE","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2024.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Over the past millennia, the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules has essentially remained the same with </span>thyroidectomy<span> as the only reliable method to identify malignancy. However, in the last 30 years, technological advances have significantly improved diagnostic management of thyroid nodules. Advances in imaging have allowed development of a reliable risk- based stratification system to identify nodules at increased risk of malignancy. At the same time, sensitive imaging has caused collateral damage to the degree that we are now identifying and treating many small, low risk nodules with little to no clinical relevance.</span></div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To review the history of thyroid nodule evaluation with emphasis on recent changes and future pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Literature review and discussion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thyroid<span> ultrasound remains the best initial method to evaluate the thyroid gland for nodules. Different risk-of-malignancy protocols have been developed and introduced by different societies, reporting methods have been developed and improved each, with goals of improving the ability to recognize nodules requiring further intervention and minimizing excessive monitoring of those who do not. Once identified, cytological evaluation of nodules further enhances malignancy identification with molecular markers assisting in ruling out malignancies in indeterminate nodules preventing unneeded intervention. And all societies have urged avoidance of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk cancers of little to no clinical relevance.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this review, we describe advancements in nodule evaluation and management, while emphasizing caution in overdiagnosing and overtreating low-risk lesions without clinical importance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 114-123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thyroid Nodules: Past, Present, and Future\",\"authors\":\"Alan A. Parsa MD, FACE ,&nbsp;Hossein Gharib MD, MACP, MACE\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eprac.2024.05.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Over the past millennia, the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules has essentially remained the same with </span>thyroidectomy<span> as the only reliable method to identify malignancy. However, in the last 30 years, technological advances have significantly improved diagnostic management of thyroid nodules. Advances in imaging have allowed development of a reliable risk- based stratification system to identify nodules at increased risk of malignancy. At the same time, sensitive imaging has caused collateral damage to the degree that we are now identifying and treating many small, low risk nodules with little to no clinical relevance.</span></div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To review the history of thyroid nodule evaluation with emphasis on recent changes and future pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Literature review and discussion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thyroid<span> ultrasound remains the best initial method to evaluate the thyroid gland for nodules. Different risk-of-malignancy protocols have been developed and introduced by different societies, reporting methods have been developed and improved each, with goals of improving the ability to recognize nodules requiring further intervention and minimizing excessive monitoring of those who do not. Once identified, cytological evaluation of nodules further enhances malignancy identification with molecular markers assisting in ruling out malignancies in indeterminate nodules preventing unneeded intervention. And all societies have urged avoidance of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk cancers of little to no clinical relevance.</span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this review, we describe advancements in nodule evaluation and management, while emphasizing caution in overdiagnosing and overtreating low-risk lesions without clinical importance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine Practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 114-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1530891X24005585\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1530891X24005585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个多世纪以来,区分甲状腺结节良恶性的能力一直是个难题。从历史上看,甲状腺切除术是诊断甲状腺癌的唯一明确方法,考虑到大约90-95%的甲状腺结节是良性的,因此大量的甲状腺切除术都是良性疾病。包括高灵敏度超声波检查、细针穿刺细胞学检查、分子研究和未来人工智能的使用在内的诊断技术的进步有助于区分良性和恶性,并大大减少了良性结节不必要的手术数量。目前和未来可能的诊断改进使我们面临一个新的难题。在减少良性疾病手术数量的同时,我们现在却在过度诊断和过度治疗低风险亚临床恶性肿瘤。在此,我们将介绍一些导致目前状况的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thyroid Nodules: Past, Present, and Future

Background

Over the past millennia, the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules has essentially remained the same with thyroidectomy as the only reliable method to identify malignancy. However, in the last 30 years, technological advances have significantly improved diagnostic management of thyroid nodules. Advances in imaging have allowed development of a reliable risk- based stratification system to identify nodules at increased risk of malignancy. At the same time, sensitive imaging has caused collateral damage to the degree that we are now identifying and treating many small, low risk nodules with little to no clinical relevance.

Objective

To review the history of thyroid nodule evaluation with emphasis on recent changes and future pathways.

Methods

Literature review and discussion.

Results

Thyroid ultrasound remains the best initial method to evaluate the thyroid gland for nodules. Different risk-of-malignancy protocols have been developed and introduced by different societies, reporting methods have been developed and improved each, with goals of improving the ability to recognize nodules requiring further intervention and minimizing excessive monitoring of those who do not. Once identified, cytological evaluation of nodules further enhances malignancy identification with molecular markers assisting in ruling out malignancies in indeterminate nodules preventing unneeded intervention. And all societies have urged avoidance of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk cancers of little to no clinical relevance.

Conclusion

In this review, we describe advancements in nodule evaluation and management, while emphasizing caution in overdiagnosing and overtreating low-risk lesions without clinical importance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine Practice
Endocrine Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.
期刊最新文献
Multimodal evaluation of differentiated thyroid cancer patient information booklets: strengths and limitations in content quality, readability, and patient-centered communication. Corrigendum to "American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Consensus Statement: Algorithm for Management of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes - 2026 Update" [Endocrine Practice. 2026;32(4):473-518]. Correlating menstrual cycles and cystic fibrosis symptoms in the era of highly effective modulators: Findings of the MENSTRUAL study. Revisiting Injectable Estradiol Valerate Dosing for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Review. Updates in Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes (CFRD).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1