抵抗力、复原力和成长的动力系统原理。

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01
Yannick Hill, Ruud J R Den Hartigh
{"title":"抵抗力、复原力和成长的动力系统原理。","authors":"Yannick Hill, Ruud J R Den Hartigh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resilience has traditionally been conceptualized as resisting, bouncing back from, and growing from a stressor. However, recent literature has pointed out that these are different processes with bouncing back coming closest to the literal meaning of the term resilience. To detect whether an individual demonstrates one of these three stressor-responses, different analysis strategies have been suggested. However, deeper theoretical explanations for how patterns of resistance, resilience, and growth come about, have been lacking. To address this gap, this paper proposes a coherent framework based on a dynamical systems approach. We first discuss how adapting to stressors emerges from complex interactions between multiple levels of organization within the system. These interactions unfold on different time scales: What appears as resistance on slower or macro scales may actually consist of bouncing back at micro scales that change much faster. Next, we discuss how the different trajectories that distinguish resistance, resilience, and growth can be understood through attractor dynamics. We address the fixed-point attractors, which are commonly used in the resilience literature to detect early warning signals of bifurcations following resilience losses. Moreover, we describe the implications of limit cycles and strange attractors which capture multiple pathways to adapt to stressors that can lead to growth patterns. We conclude that resisting, bouncing back from, or growing from a stressor represent distinct phenomena that can be distinguished both empirically and theoretically from a dynamical systems perspective. These distinctions may drive future development of theoretical models, empirical measurements, and theory-driven interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46218,"journal":{"name":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamical Systems Principles Underlying Resistance, Resilience, and Growth.\",\"authors\":\"Yannick Hill, Ruud J R Den Hartigh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Resilience has traditionally been conceptualized as resisting, bouncing back from, and growing from a stressor. However, recent literature has pointed out that these are different processes with bouncing back coming closest to the literal meaning of the term resilience. To detect whether an individual demonstrates one of these three stressor-responses, different analysis strategies have been suggested. However, deeper theoretical explanations for how patterns of resistance, resilience, and growth come about, have been lacking. To address this gap, this paper proposes a coherent framework based on a dynamical systems approach. We first discuss how adapting to stressors emerges from complex interactions between multiple levels of organization within the system. These interactions unfold on different time scales: What appears as resistance on slower or macro scales may actually consist of bouncing back at micro scales that change much faster. Next, we discuss how the different trajectories that distinguish resistance, resilience, and growth can be understood through attractor dynamics. We address the fixed-point attractors, which are commonly used in the resilience literature to detect early warning signals of bifurcations following resilience losses. Moreover, we describe the implications of limit cycles and strange attractors which capture multiple pathways to adapt to stressors that can lead to growth patterns. We conclude that resisting, bouncing back from, or growing from a stressor represent distinct phenomena that can be distinguished both empirically and theoretically from a dynamical systems perspective. These distinctions may drive future development of theoretical models, empirical measurements, and theory-driven interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MATHEMATICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复原力的传统概念是抵抗压力、从压力中反弹以及从压力中成长。然而,最近有文献指出,这三个过程是不同的,反弹最接近复原力一词的字面含义。为了检测一个人是否表现出这三种压力源反应之一,人们提出了不同的分析策略。然而,对于抵抗力、恢复力和成长的模式是如何产生的,一直缺乏更深层次的理论解释。为了弥补这一不足,本文提出了一个基于动力系统方法的连贯框架。我们首先讨论了如何通过系统内多个组织层次之间的复杂互动来适应压力因素。这些相互作用在不同的时间尺度上展开:在较慢或宏观尺度上看似抵抗,实际上可能是在变化更快的微观尺度上的反弹。接下来,我们将讨论如何通过吸引子动力学来理解区分阻力、恢复力和增长的不同轨迹。我们讨论了定点吸引子,这在复原力文献中常用来检测复原力损失后分岔的早期预警信号。此外,我们还描述了极限循环和奇异吸引子的含义,它们捕捉到了适应压力因素的多种途径,可导致增长模式。我们的结论是,抵御压力源、从压力源中反弹或从压力源中成长代表了不同的现象,这些现象可以从动力系统的角度进行经验和理论区分。这些区别可能会推动理论模型、实证测量和以理论为导向的干预措施的未来发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamical Systems Principles Underlying Resistance, Resilience, and Growth.

Resilience has traditionally been conceptualized as resisting, bouncing back from, and growing from a stressor. However, recent literature has pointed out that these are different processes with bouncing back coming closest to the literal meaning of the term resilience. To detect whether an individual demonstrates one of these three stressor-responses, different analysis strategies have been suggested. However, deeper theoretical explanations for how patterns of resistance, resilience, and growth come about, have been lacking. To address this gap, this paper proposes a coherent framework based on a dynamical systems approach. We first discuss how adapting to stressors emerges from complex interactions between multiple levels of organization within the system. These interactions unfold on different time scales: What appears as resistance on slower or macro scales may actually consist of bouncing back at micro scales that change much faster. Next, we discuss how the different trajectories that distinguish resistance, resilience, and growth can be understood through attractor dynamics. We address the fixed-point attractors, which are commonly used in the resilience literature to detect early warning signals of bifurcations following resilience losses. Moreover, we describe the implications of limit cycles and strange attractors which capture multiple pathways to adapt to stressors that can lead to growth patterns. We conclude that resisting, bouncing back from, or growing from a stressor represent distinct phenomena that can be distinguished both empirically and theoretically from a dynamical systems perspective. These distinctions may drive future development of theoretical models, empirical measurements, and theory-driven interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Dynamical Systems Principles Underlying Resistance, Resilience, and Growth. Elasticity, Rigidity, and Resilience in Occupational Contexts. Resilience as Anticipation in Organizational Systems: An Agent-based Computational Approach. Romantic Resilience: Fractal Conflict Dynamics and Network Flexibility Predict Dating Satisfaction and Commitment. Structural Integrity, Flexibility, and Timing: Introduction to a Special Issue on Resilience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1