静脉输注白蛋白不会提高急性重症溃疡性结肠炎患者对单纯肠内营养和静脉类固醇联合疗法的应答率:一项随机对照试验。

Sandeep K Mundhra, Divya Madan, Rithvik Golla, Pabitro Sahu, Sudheer K Vuyyuru, Bhaskar Kante, Peeyush Kumar, David Matthew, Shubham Prasad, Manas Vaishnav, Mahak Verma, Shubi Virmani, Aditya Bajaj, Manasvani Markandey, Mukesh Kumar Ranjan, Umang Arora, Mukesh Kumar Singh, Govind K Makharia, Vineet Ahuja, Saurabh Kedia
{"title":"静脉输注白蛋白不会提高急性重症溃疡性结肠炎患者对单纯肠内营养和静脉类固醇联合疗法的应答率:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Sandeep K Mundhra, Divya Madan, Rithvik Golla, Pabitro Sahu, Sudheer K Vuyyuru, Bhaskar Kante, Peeyush Kumar, David Matthew, Shubham Prasad, Manas Vaishnav, Mahak Verma, Shubi Virmani, Aditya Bajaj, Manasvani Markandey, Mukesh Kumar Ranjan, Umang Arora, Mukesh Kumar Singh, Govind K Makharia, Vineet Ahuja, Saurabh Kedia","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>30-40% patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) fail intravenous (IV) steroids requiring medical rescue therapy/colectomy. Low baseline albumin predicts steroid non-response, and exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) has been shown to improve steroid response and albumin levels. Albumin infusion due to its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties might further improve steroid response in ASUC, which was evaluated in present study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label randomized controlled trial, patients with ASUC were randomized in 1:1 ratio to albumin + standard of care (SOC) + EEN vs. SOC + EEN (Jan2021 - Feb2023). Both arms received 5 days of EEN with 400 mg IV hydrocortisone/day. Patients in albumin arm were administered 5 days of 20% w/v intravenous albumin (100 ml). Primary outcome was 1) steroid failure (need for rescue medical therapy or colectomy) and 2) proportion of patients with adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one patients (albumin-30, SOC-31)(mean age-31.6±0.4 years, male-57.4%), were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable. There was no difference in steroid failure between albumin and SOC arm(10/30(33.33 %) vs 13/31(41.94 %), p=0.49). No adverse events were reported with albumin infusions. Colectomy rate(10% vs 9.68%, P=1), response to salvage medical therapy (88.89% vs 76.92%, P=0.62) and median duration of hospitalization (10.5(7-16) vs 10(7-20), P=0.43) were also comparable. Long-term composite outcome of colectomy and re-admission rates was numerically higher in the albumin than SOC arm (37.04% vs 17.86%, p>0.05), although it did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no benefit of intravenous albumin infusion as an adjunct to IV steroids and EEN in patients with ASUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous albumin infusion does not augment the response rate to a combination of exclusive enteral nutrition and intravenous steroids in acute severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sandeep K Mundhra, Divya Madan, Rithvik Golla, Pabitro Sahu, Sudheer K Vuyyuru, Bhaskar Kante, Peeyush Kumar, David Matthew, Shubham Prasad, Manas Vaishnav, Mahak Verma, Shubi Virmani, Aditya Bajaj, Manasvani Markandey, Mukesh Kumar Ranjan, Umang Arora, Mukesh Kumar Singh, Govind K Makharia, Vineet Ahuja, Saurabh Kedia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>30-40% patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) fail intravenous (IV) steroids requiring medical rescue therapy/colectomy. Low baseline albumin predicts steroid non-response, and exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) has been shown to improve steroid response and albumin levels. Albumin infusion due to its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties might further improve steroid response in ASUC, which was evaluated in present study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label randomized controlled trial, patients with ASUC were randomized in 1:1 ratio to albumin + standard of care (SOC) + EEN vs. SOC + EEN (Jan2021 - Feb2023). Both arms received 5 days of EEN with 400 mg IV hydrocortisone/day. Patients in albumin arm were administered 5 days of 20% w/v intravenous albumin (100 ml). Primary outcome was 1) steroid failure (need for rescue medical therapy or colectomy) and 2) proportion of patients with adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one patients (albumin-30, SOC-31)(mean age-31.6±0.4 years, male-57.4%), were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable. There was no difference in steroid failure between albumin and SOC arm(10/30(33.33 %) vs 13/31(41.94 %), p=0.49). No adverse events were reported with albumin infusions. Colectomy rate(10% vs 9.68%, P=1), response to salvage medical therapy (88.89% vs 76.92%, P=0.62) and median duration of hospitalization (10.5(7-16) vs 10(7-20), P=0.43) were also comparable. Long-term composite outcome of colectomy and re-admission rates was numerically higher in the albumin than SOC arm (37.04% vs 17.86%, p>0.05), although it did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no benefit of intravenous albumin infusion as an adjunct to IV steroids and EEN in patients with ASUC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's & colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介30-40% 的急性重度溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)患者静脉注射类固醇(IV)无效,需要进行药物抢救治疗/切除术。低基线白蛋白可预测类固醇无反应,而纯肠道营养(EEN)已被证明可改善类固醇反应和白蛋白水平。由于白蛋白具有抗炎和抗氧化特性,因此输注白蛋白可进一步改善 ASUC 的类固醇反应,本研究对此进行了评估:在这项开放标签随机对照试验中,ASUC患者按1:1的比例被随机分为白蛋白+标准护理(SOC)+EEN与SOC+EEN两组(2021年1月至2023年2月)。两组患者均接受了为期5天的EEN治疗,同时静脉滴注400毫克氢化可的松/天。白蛋白治疗组患者接受为期 5 天的 20% w/v 静脉注射白蛋白(100 毫升)。主要结果为:1)类固醇治疗失败(需要进行抢救性药物治疗或结肠切除术);2)出现不良反应的患者比例:共纳入 61 例患者(白蛋白-30 例,SOC-31 例)(平均年龄(31.6±0.4)岁,男性-57.4%)。基线特征具有可比性。白蛋白治疗组和 SOC 治疗组的类固醇治疗失败率没有差异(10/30(33.33%) vs 13/31(41.94%),P=0.49)。白蛋白输注未出现不良反应。结肠切除率(10% vs 9.68%,P=1)、对挽救性药物治疗的反应(88.89% vs 76.92%,P=0.62)和中位住院时间(10.5(7-16) vs 10(7-20),P=0.43)也相当。白蛋白治疗组的结肠切除术和再入院率的长期综合结果在数字上高于SOC治疗组(37.04% vs 17.86%,P>0.05),但未达到统计学意义:结论:对于 ASUC 患者,静脉输注白蛋白作为静脉类固醇和 EEN 的辅助治疗并无益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous albumin infusion does not augment the response rate to a combination of exclusive enteral nutrition and intravenous steroids in acute severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Introduction: 30-40% patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) fail intravenous (IV) steroids requiring medical rescue therapy/colectomy. Low baseline albumin predicts steroid non-response, and exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) has been shown to improve steroid response and albumin levels. Albumin infusion due to its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties might further improve steroid response in ASUC, which was evaluated in present study.

Methods: In this open-label randomized controlled trial, patients with ASUC were randomized in 1:1 ratio to albumin + standard of care (SOC) + EEN vs. SOC + EEN (Jan2021 - Feb2023). Both arms received 5 days of EEN with 400 mg IV hydrocortisone/day. Patients in albumin arm were administered 5 days of 20% w/v intravenous albumin (100 ml). Primary outcome was 1) steroid failure (need for rescue medical therapy or colectomy) and 2) proportion of patients with adverse events.

Results: Sixty-one patients (albumin-30, SOC-31)(mean age-31.6±0.4 years, male-57.4%), were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable. There was no difference in steroid failure between albumin and SOC arm(10/30(33.33 %) vs 13/31(41.94 %), p=0.49). No adverse events were reported with albumin infusions. Colectomy rate(10% vs 9.68%, P=1), response to salvage medical therapy (88.89% vs 76.92%, P=0.62) and median duration of hospitalization (10.5(7-16) vs 10(7-20), P=0.43) were also comparable. Long-term composite outcome of colectomy and re-admission rates was numerically higher in the albumin than SOC arm (37.04% vs 17.86%, p>0.05), although it did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: There was no benefit of intravenous albumin infusion as an adjunct to IV steroids and EEN in patients with ASUC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Etrasimod Corticosteroid-Free Efficacy, Impact of Concomitant Corticosteroids on Efficacy and Safety, and Corticosteroid-Sparing Effect in UC: Analyses of the ELEVATE UC Clinical Programme. Outcomes of patients with prior biologic intolerance are better than those with biologic failure in clinical trials of inflammatory bowel disease. Preventing Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-"The Big Five". Letter: Change in bowel urgency in active ulcerative colitis patients treated with Curcumin-QingDai (CurQD): A post-hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Comparative Efficacy of Novel Biologics, Antitumour Necrosis Factor Agents, and Immunomodulators to Prevent Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1