利用机器学习不确定性估计进行选择性分类可改善 ACS 预测:院前环境中的回顾性研究。

Juan Jose Garcia, Rebecca Kitzmiller, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Jessica K Zégre-Hemsey
{"title":"利用机器学习不确定性估计进行选择性分类可改善 ACS 预测:院前环境中的回顾性研究。","authors":"Juan Jose Garcia, Rebecca Kitzmiller, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Jessica K Zégre-Hemsey","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4437265/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate identification of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the prehospital sestting is important for timely treatments that reduce damage to the compromised myocardium. Current machine learning approaches lack sufficient performance to safely rule-in or rule-out ACS. Our goal is to identify a method that bridges this gap. To do so, we retrospectively evaluate two promising approaches, an ensemble of gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT) and selective classification (SC) on consecutive patients transported by ambulance to the ED with chest pain and/or anginal equivalents. On the task of ACS classification with 23 prehospital covariates, we found the fusion of the two (GBDT+SC) improves the best reported sensitivity and specificity by 8% and 23% respectively. Accordingly, GBDT+SC is safer than current machine learning approaches to rule-in and rule-out of ACS in the prehospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94282,"journal":{"name":"Research square","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective classification with machine learning uncertainty estimates improves ACS prediction: A retrospective study in the prehospital setting.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Jose Garcia, Rebecca Kitzmiller, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Jessica K Zégre-Hemsey\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4437265/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate identification of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the prehospital sestting is important for timely treatments that reduce damage to the compromised myocardium. Current machine learning approaches lack sufficient performance to safely rule-in or rule-out ACS. Our goal is to identify a method that bridges this gap. To do so, we retrospectively evaluate two promising approaches, an ensemble of gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT) and selective classification (SC) on consecutive patients transported by ambulance to the ED with chest pain and/or anginal equivalents. On the task of ACS classification with 23 prehospital covariates, we found the fusion of the two (GBDT+SC) improves the best reported sensitivity and specificity by 8% and 23% respectively. Accordingly, GBDT+SC is safer than current machine learning approaches to rule-in and rule-out of ACS in the prehospital setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research square\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11177980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research square\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4437265/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4437265/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在院前环境中准确识别急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)对于及时治疗以减少对受损心肌的损害非常重要。目前的机器学习方法缺乏足够的性能,无法安全地排除 ACS。我们的目标是找出一种能弥补这一不足的方法。为此,我们对两种有前途的方法进行了回顾性评估,即梯度提升决策树(GBDT)和选择性分类(SC)的组合,评估对象是由救护车送往急诊室的连续胸痛和/或心绞痛患者。在使用 23 个院前协变量进行 ACS 分类的任务中,我们发现两者的融合(GBDT+SC)可将最佳报告灵敏度和特异性分别提高 8% 和 23%。因此,在院前环境中,GBDT+SC 比目前的机器学习方法更能安全地排除 ACS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selective classification with machine learning uncertainty estimates improves ACS prediction: A retrospective study in the prehospital setting.

Accurate identification of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the prehospital sestting is important for timely treatments that reduce damage to the compromised myocardium. Current machine learning approaches lack sufficient performance to safely rule-in or rule-out ACS. Our goal is to identify a method that bridges this gap. To do so, we retrospectively evaluate two promising approaches, an ensemble of gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT) and selective classification (SC) on consecutive patients transported by ambulance to the ED with chest pain and/or anginal equivalents. On the task of ACS classification with 23 prehospital covariates, we found the fusion of the two (GBDT+SC) improves the best reported sensitivity and specificity by 8% and 23% respectively. Accordingly, GBDT+SC is safer than current machine learning approaches to rule-in and rule-out of ACS in the prehospital setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long non-coding RNA Malat1 fine-tunes bone homeostasis and repair by orchestrating cellular crosstalk and the β-catenin-OPG/Jagged1 pathway. Dietary lipid is largely deposited in skin and rapidly affects insulating properties. Novel Machine Learning of DNA Methylation Patterns to Diagnose Complex Disease: Identification of Cerebral Palsy with Concurrent Epilepsy. The context-dependent epigenetic and organogenesis programs determine 3D vs. 2D cellular fitness of MYC-driven murine liver cancer cells. GZMK+CD8+ T cells Target A Specific Acinar Cell Type in Sjögren's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1