{"title":"重新评估胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的肾实质切除术:中国高容量中心的经验","authors":"Haoqi Zhang, Chunlu Tan, Xubao Liu, Xing Wang","doi":"10.1097/jp9.0000000000000184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Parenchyma-sparing resections (PSRs) are increasingly used for small pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) to preserve the function of the gland. However, the data are extremely limited due to the rarity of this tumor.\n \n \n \n This study sought to describe the indications, operative technique, short and long-term outcomes of PSRs for PNENs, with a focus on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and oncologic outcomes.\n \n \n \n From 2008 to 2018, data collected retrospectively from 113 PNENs that underwent PSRs (113/421, 27%) were reviewed. A comparison was conducted of PSRs of PNENs without (group1, n=101) or with pancreatic transection (group 2, n=12).\n \n \n \n Of the 113 patients, the most common indication for PSRs was insulinoma (80%), followed by NF-PNEN (20%). The majority of lesions were WHO G1 grade (80/113, 71%). The mean maximum diameter of the tumors was 19 mm. Patients who underwent PSRs had a low rate of severe postoperative morbidity (7/113, 6%). Pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency occurred in only 1% and 7% of patients respectively. And there was no evidence of tumor recurrence after PSRs detected during follow-up. Age was identified as the only independent positive risk factor of POPF in group 1. Patients in group 2 had significantly higher rates of POPF (p=0.002), overall morbidity (p=0.002), severe morbidity (p=0.026) and readmission (p=0.004).\n \n \n \n PSRs of PNENs appear to be feasible and safe, preserving the endocrine and exocrine function of the gland with no increased risk of recurrence or metastasis. In contrast, PSRs involving transection of the pancreas should be performed more cautiously.\n","PeriodicalId":92925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pancreatology","volume":"32 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reappraisal of the Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Chinese High-volume Center Experience\",\"authors\":\"Haoqi Zhang, Chunlu Tan, Xubao Liu, Xing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jp9.0000000000000184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Parenchyma-sparing resections (PSRs) are increasingly used for small pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) to preserve the function of the gland. However, the data are extremely limited due to the rarity of this tumor.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study sought to describe the indications, operative technique, short and long-term outcomes of PSRs for PNENs, with a focus on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and oncologic outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n From 2008 to 2018, data collected retrospectively from 113 PNENs that underwent PSRs (113/421, 27%) were reviewed. A comparison was conducted of PSRs of PNENs without (group1, n=101) or with pancreatic transection (group 2, n=12).\\n \\n \\n \\n Of the 113 patients, the most common indication for PSRs was insulinoma (80%), followed by NF-PNEN (20%). The majority of lesions were WHO G1 grade (80/113, 71%). The mean maximum diameter of the tumors was 19 mm. Patients who underwent PSRs had a low rate of severe postoperative morbidity (7/113, 6%). Pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency occurred in only 1% and 7% of patients respectively. And there was no evidence of tumor recurrence after PSRs detected during follow-up. Age was identified as the only independent positive risk factor of POPF in group 1. Patients in group 2 had significantly higher rates of POPF (p=0.002), overall morbidity (p=0.002), severe morbidity (p=0.026) and readmission (p=0.004).\\n \\n \\n \\n PSRs of PNENs appear to be feasible and safe, preserving the endocrine and exocrine function of the gland with no increased risk of recurrence or metastasis. In contrast, PSRs involving transection of the pancreas should be performed more cautiously.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":92925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pancreatology\",\"volume\":\"32 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jp9.0000000000000184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jp9.0000000000000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了保留腺体的功能,越来越多的小型胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PNENs)采用了保留实质的切除术(PSRs)。然而,由于这种肿瘤的罕见性,相关数据极为有限。 本研究试图描述PNENs PSR的适应症、手术技术、短期和长期疗效,重点关注术后胰瘘(POPF)和肿瘤学疗效。 从 2008 年到 2018 年,回顾性收集了 113 例接受 PSR 的 PNEN(113/421,27%)的数据。对未进行 PSR 的 PNEN(第 1 组,人数=101)或进行了胰腺横切的 PNEN(第 2 组,人数=12)进行了比较。 在 113 名患者中,最常见的 PSR 适应症是胰岛素瘤(80%),其次是 NF-PNEN(20%)。大多数病变为 WHO G1 级(80/113,71%)。肿瘤的平均最大直径为 19 毫米。接受 PSR 的患者术后严重发病率较低(7/113,6%)。分别只有1%和7%的患者出现胰腺内分泌和外分泌功能不全。在随访过程中也没有发现 PSR 后肿瘤复发的证据。在第一组中,年龄被确定为 POPF 的唯一独立阳性风险因素。 第二组患者的 POPF 发生率(P=0.002)、总发病率(P=0.002)、严重发病率(P=0.026)和再入院率(P=0.004)均显著较高。 PNENs的PSR似乎是可行和安全的,它保留了腺体的内分泌和外分泌功能,不会增加复发或转移的风险。相比之下,涉及胰腺横切的 PSR 应更加谨慎。
Reappraisal of the Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Chinese High-volume Center Experience
Parenchyma-sparing resections (PSRs) are increasingly used for small pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) to preserve the function of the gland. However, the data are extremely limited due to the rarity of this tumor.
This study sought to describe the indications, operative technique, short and long-term outcomes of PSRs for PNENs, with a focus on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and oncologic outcomes.
From 2008 to 2018, data collected retrospectively from 113 PNENs that underwent PSRs (113/421, 27%) were reviewed. A comparison was conducted of PSRs of PNENs without (group1, n=101) or with pancreatic transection (group 2, n=12).
Of the 113 patients, the most common indication for PSRs was insulinoma (80%), followed by NF-PNEN (20%). The majority of lesions were WHO G1 grade (80/113, 71%). The mean maximum diameter of the tumors was 19 mm. Patients who underwent PSRs had a low rate of severe postoperative morbidity (7/113, 6%). Pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency occurred in only 1% and 7% of patients respectively. And there was no evidence of tumor recurrence after PSRs detected during follow-up. Age was identified as the only independent positive risk factor of POPF in group 1. Patients in group 2 had significantly higher rates of POPF (p=0.002), overall morbidity (p=0.002), severe morbidity (p=0.026) and readmission (p=0.004).
PSRs of PNENs appear to be feasible and safe, preserving the endocrine and exocrine function of the gland with no increased risk of recurrence or metastasis. In contrast, PSRs involving transection of the pancreas should be performed more cautiously.