基于 JCTLM 推荐的参考方法,通过连续 6 年的能力验证,评估华南地区临床实验室的血清葡萄糖标准化情况

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1515/labmed-2024-0037
Xueying Lin, Qiaofang Yan, Yuanyuan Du, Jianbing Wang, Di Huang, Jun Yan, Min Zhan, Pengwei Zhang, Jingyu Cheng, Qiaoxuan Zhang, Xianzhang Huang, Liqiao Han
{"title":"基于 JCTLM 推荐的参考方法,通过连续 6 年的能力验证,评估华南地区临床实验室的血清葡萄糖标准化情况","authors":"Xueying Lin, Qiaofang Yan, Yuanyuan Du, Jianbing Wang, Di Huang, Jun Yan, Min Zhan, Pengwei Zhang, Jingyu Cheng, Qiaoxuan Zhang, Xianzhang Huang, Liqiao Han","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2024-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The accuracy of blood glucose measurement in clinical laboratories is vital for diabetes diagnosis. Trueness Verification Plan was carried out and analyzed for evaluating the standardization of serum glucose among clinical laboratories. Methods Trueness verification samples were distributed to clinical laboratories for three days measurement, and their target values were assigned by two certified reference laboratories. The relative bias, coefficient of variation (CV), and total error (TE) for each clinical laboratory were calculated and analyzed. Moreover, the Six Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index were utilized to reflect the measurement quality of the clinical laboratories. Results The pass rates evaluated by bias, CV, and TE ranged from 45.2 % to 64.8 %, 96.8 %–98.9 %, and 83.9 %–97.1 % over the six years. The matched systems used in clinical laboratories demonstrated better accuracy than the un-matched systems. The pass rate by bias of hexokinase method is 53.1 %–78.6 %, while the glucose oxidase method is 29.2 %–52.2 %. Overall, 74.2 %–85.7 % of clinical laboratories achieved an acceptable level (both σ>3), and 35.2 %–61.4 % of laboratories reached a “world-class” level (both σ>6). Conclusions The quality for serum glucose measurement has been greatly improved. However, standardization among clinical systems still needs to be further promoted.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation for serum glucose standardization in clinical laboratories of Southern China by consecutive 6 years proficiency testing based on JCTLM-recommended reference methods\",\"authors\":\"Xueying Lin, Qiaofang Yan, Yuanyuan Du, Jianbing Wang, Di Huang, Jun Yan, Min Zhan, Pengwei Zhang, Jingyu Cheng, Qiaoxuan Zhang, Xianzhang Huang, Liqiao Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2024-0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives The accuracy of blood glucose measurement in clinical laboratories is vital for diabetes diagnosis. Trueness Verification Plan was carried out and analyzed for evaluating the standardization of serum glucose among clinical laboratories. Methods Trueness verification samples were distributed to clinical laboratories for three days measurement, and their target values were assigned by two certified reference laboratories. The relative bias, coefficient of variation (CV), and total error (TE) for each clinical laboratory were calculated and analyzed. Moreover, the Six Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index were utilized to reflect the measurement quality of the clinical laboratories. Results The pass rates evaluated by bias, CV, and TE ranged from 45.2 % to 64.8 %, 96.8 %–98.9 %, and 83.9 %–97.1 % over the six years. The matched systems used in clinical laboratories demonstrated better accuracy than the un-matched systems. The pass rate by bias of hexokinase method is 53.1 %–78.6 %, while the glucose oxidase method is 29.2 %–52.2 %. Overall, 74.2 %–85.7 % of clinical laboratories achieved an acceptable level (both σ>3), and 35.2 %–61.4 % of laboratories reached a “world-class” level (both σ>6). Conclusions The quality for serum glucose measurement has been greatly improved. However, standardization among clinical systems still needs to be further promoted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2024-0037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2024-0037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 目的 临床实验室血糖测量的准确性对糖尿病诊断至关重要。为评价临床实验室血清葡萄糖的标准化程度,我们开展了真实性验证计划并进行了分析。方法 将真实性验证样本分发到各临床实验室进行为期三天的测量,并由两家认证参考实验室分配其目标值。计算并分析了各临床实验室的相对偏差、变异系数(CV)和总误差(TE)。此外,还利用六西格玛指标和质量目标指数来反映临床实验室的测量质量。结果 在这六年中,根据偏差、CV 和 TE 评估的合格率介于 45.2 % 至 64.8 %、96.8 % 至 98.9 % 和 83.9 % 至 97.1 % 之间。临床实验室使用的匹配系统比非匹配系统的准确度更高。己糖激酶法的偏差合格率为 53.1 %-78.6 %,而葡萄糖氧化酶法为 29.2 %-52.2 %。总体而言,74.2%-85.7%的临床实验室达到了可接受水平(均为σ>3),35.2%-61.4%的实验室达到了 "世界级 "水平(均为σ>6)。结论 血清葡萄糖测量的质量已大大提高。然而,临床系统之间的标准化仍需进一步推进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation for serum glucose standardization in clinical laboratories of Southern China by consecutive 6 years proficiency testing based on JCTLM-recommended reference methods
Abstract Objectives The accuracy of blood glucose measurement in clinical laboratories is vital for diabetes diagnosis. Trueness Verification Plan was carried out and analyzed for evaluating the standardization of serum glucose among clinical laboratories. Methods Trueness verification samples were distributed to clinical laboratories for three days measurement, and their target values were assigned by two certified reference laboratories. The relative bias, coefficient of variation (CV), and total error (TE) for each clinical laboratory were calculated and analyzed. Moreover, the Six Sigma metrics and Quality Goal Index were utilized to reflect the measurement quality of the clinical laboratories. Results The pass rates evaluated by bias, CV, and TE ranged from 45.2 % to 64.8 %, 96.8 %–98.9 %, and 83.9 %–97.1 % over the six years. The matched systems used in clinical laboratories demonstrated better accuracy than the un-matched systems. The pass rate by bias of hexokinase method is 53.1 %–78.6 %, while the glucose oxidase method is 29.2 %–52.2 %. Overall, 74.2 %–85.7 % of clinical laboratories achieved an acceptable level (both σ>3), and 35.2 %–61.4 % of laboratories reached a “world-class” level (both σ>6). Conclusions The quality for serum glucose measurement has been greatly improved. However, standardization among clinical systems still needs to be further promoted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the stability of uncentrifuged serum and plasma analytes at various post-collection intervals How Gaussian mixture modelling can help to verify reference intervals from laboratory data with a high proportion of pathological values Using machine learning techniques for exploration and classification of laboratory data Automated sex and age partitioning for the estimation of reference intervals using a regression tree model Serum LDH and its isoenzymes (LDH2 and LDH5) associated with predictive value for refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1