国家牛肉质量审核 - 2022 年:对决定喂养母牛和小母牛胴体特征的质量和产量进行厂内评估

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae098
Thachary R Mayer, Sydni E Borders, Trent E Schwartz, K. Gehring, D. Griffin, Christopher R Kerth, K. Belk, J. Scanga, Mahesh N Nair, M. Pfeiffer, G. Mafi, Keayla M Harr, T. Lawrence, T. Tennant, L. Lucherk, T. O’Quinn, Erin S. Beyer, Phil D Bass, Lyda G Garcia, Benjamin M. Bohrer, J. Pempek, A. Garmyn, R. Maddock, C. Carr, T. Pringle, Tracy L Scheffler, J. Scheffler, A. Stelzleni, John M. Gonzalez, Keith R. Underwood, Bailey N Harsh, Crystal M Waters, J. W. Savell
{"title":"国家牛肉质量审核 - 2022 年:对决定喂养母牛和小母牛胴体特征的质量和产量进行厂内评估","authors":"Thachary R Mayer, Sydni E Borders, Trent E Schwartz, K. Gehring, D. Griffin, Christopher R Kerth, K. Belk, J. Scanga, Mahesh N Nair, M. Pfeiffer, G. Mafi, Keayla M Harr, T. Lawrence, T. Tennant, L. Lucherk, T. O’Quinn, Erin S. Beyer, Phil D Bass, Lyda G Garcia, Benjamin M. Bohrer, J. Pempek, A. Garmyn, R. Maddock, C. Carr, T. Pringle, Tracy L Scheffler, J. Scheffler, A. Stelzleni, John M. Gonzalez, Keith R. Underwood, Bailey N Harsh, Crystal M Waters, J. W. Savell","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA)-2022 serves as a benchmark of the current fed steer and heifer population of the U.S. beef industry and allows comparison to previous audits as a method of monitoring industry progress. In-plant cooler assessments and collections of beef carcass data took place from July 2021 to November 2022. During in-plant evaluations, 10% of one day’s production was surveyed for quality and yield indicating characteristics of fed beef carcasses (n = 9,746 beef carcasses). Distributions of sex classes among sampled carcasses were steer (65.0%) and heifer (35.0%), whereas distributions of breed type were native (87.7%), dairy (11.3%), and Bos indicus (0.9%). Mean values were observed for USDA YG (3.3), overall USDA QG (Choice16), marbling score (Small98), REA (91.0 cm2), AFT (1.49 cm), HCW (401.9 kg), and KPH (2.5%). Mean overall maturity was A66, with a mean lean maturity of A56 and mean skeletal maturity of A72. There were 28.1% of carcasses identified for use in a USDA-certified beef G-Schedule Program. Defects, such as dark cutting and blood splash, were observed at 1.7% and 0.5%, respectively. Distributions of USDA YG were YG 1 (8.2%), YG 2 (30.7%), YG 3 (40.2%), YG 4 (16.6%), and YG 5 (4.3%). USDA QGs were observed at 7.5% Prime, 69.2% Choice, 16.4% Select, and 6.8% Other. The results of this study provide an updated look at the current grading trends of beef carcasses in the United States to drive progress in the fed beef industry.","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Beef Quality Audit – 2022: In-plant assessments of quality and yield determining carcass characteristics of fed steers and heifers\",\"authors\":\"Thachary R Mayer, Sydni E Borders, Trent E Schwartz, K. Gehring, D. Griffin, Christopher R Kerth, K. Belk, J. Scanga, Mahesh N Nair, M. Pfeiffer, G. Mafi, Keayla M Harr, T. Lawrence, T. Tennant, L. Lucherk, T. O’Quinn, Erin S. Beyer, Phil D Bass, Lyda G Garcia, Benjamin M. Bohrer, J. Pempek, A. Garmyn, R. Maddock, C. Carr, T. Pringle, Tracy L Scheffler, J. Scheffler, A. Stelzleni, John M. Gonzalez, Keith R. Underwood, Bailey N Harsh, Crystal M Waters, J. W. Savell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txae098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA)-2022 serves as a benchmark of the current fed steer and heifer population of the U.S. beef industry and allows comparison to previous audits as a method of monitoring industry progress. In-plant cooler assessments and collections of beef carcass data took place from July 2021 to November 2022. During in-plant evaluations, 10% of one day’s production was surveyed for quality and yield indicating characteristics of fed beef carcasses (n = 9,746 beef carcasses). Distributions of sex classes among sampled carcasses were steer (65.0%) and heifer (35.0%), whereas distributions of breed type were native (87.7%), dairy (11.3%), and Bos indicus (0.9%). Mean values were observed for USDA YG (3.3), overall USDA QG (Choice16), marbling score (Small98), REA (91.0 cm2), AFT (1.49 cm), HCW (401.9 kg), and KPH (2.5%). Mean overall maturity was A66, with a mean lean maturity of A56 and mean skeletal maturity of A72. There were 28.1% of carcasses identified for use in a USDA-certified beef G-Schedule Program. Defects, such as dark cutting and blood splash, were observed at 1.7% and 0.5%, respectively. Distributions of USDA YG were YG 1 (8.2%), YG 2 (30.7%), YG 3 (40.2%), YG 4 (16.6%), and YG 5 (4.3%). USDA QGs were observed at 7.5% Prime, 69.2% Choice, 16.4% Select, and 6.8% Other. The results of this study provide an updated look at the current grading trends of beef carcasses in the United States to drive progress in the fed beef industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年全国牛肉质量审核 (NBQA)-2022 是当前美国牛肉业饲养公牛和母牛数量的基准,可与以前的审核进行比较,作为监督行业进展的一种方法。2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 11 月期间进行了厂内冷却器评估和牛肉胴体数据收集。在厂内评估期间,对一天产量的 10% 进行了调查,以了解喂养牛肉胴体的质量和产量特征(n = 9,746 头牛肉胴体)。采样胴体的性别等级分布为公牛(65.0%)和母牛(35.0%),品种类型分布为本地牛(87.7%)、奶牛(11.3%)和阉牛(0.9%)。观察到的平均值包括 USDA YG(3.3)、总体 USDA QG(Choice16)、大理石纹评分(Small98)、REA(91.0 平方厘米)、AFT(1.49 厘米)、HCW(401.9 千克)和 KPH(2.5%)。平均总成熟度为 A66,平均瘦肉成熟度为 A56,平均骨骼成熟度为 A72。28.1%的胴体被认定可用于美国农业部认证的牛肉G级计划。暗割和溅血等缺陷分别占 1.7% 和 0.5%。美国农业部 YG 分布为 YG 1(8.2%)、YG 2(30.7%)、YG 3(40.2%)、YG 4(16.6%)和 YG 5(4.3%)。据观察,美国农业部的 QGs 为 7.5% 优质、69.2% 特选、16.4% 精选和 6.8% 其他。这项研究的结果提供了当前美国牛肉胴体分级趋势的最新情况,以推动饲料牛肉行业的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National Beef Quality Audit – 2022: In-plant assessments of quality and yield determining carcass characteristics of fed steers and heifers
The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA)-2022 serves as a benchmark of the current fed steer and heifer population of the U.S. beef industry and allows comparison to previous audits as a method of monitoring industry progress. In-plant cooler assessments and collections of beef carcass data took place from July 2021 to November 2022. During in-plant evaluations, 10% of one day’s production was surveyed for quality and yield indicating characteristics of fed beef carcasses (n = 9,746 beef carcasses). Distributions of sex classes among sampled carcasses were steer (65.0%) and heifer (35.0%), whereas distributions of breed type were native (87.7%), dairy (11.3%), and Bos indicus (0.9%). Mean values were observed for USDA YG (3.3), overall USDA QG (Choice16), marbling score (Small98), REA (91.0 cm2), AFT (1.49 cm), HCW (401.9 kg), and KPH (2.5%). Mean overall maturity was A66, with a mean lean maturity of A56 and mean skeletal maturity of A72. There were 28.1% of carcasses identified for use in a USDA-certified beef G-Schedule Program. Defects, such as dark cutting and blood splash, were observed at 1.7% and 0.5%, respectively. Distributions of USDA YG were YG 1 (8.2%), YG 2 (30.7%), YG 3 (40.2%), YG 4 (16.6%), and YG 5 (4.3%). USDA QGs were observed at 7.5% Prime, 69.2% Choice, 16.4% Select, and 6.8% Other. The results of this study provide an updated look at the current grading trends of beef carcasses in the United States to drive progress in the fed beef industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of formaldehyde when complete feed and soybean meal were inoculated with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, and Seneca Valley virus 1. Effect of balanced vs. standard protein on muscle mass development in exercising horses. Mealworm larvae and black soldier fly larvae as novel protein supplements for cattle consuming low-quality forage. Determination of gas flux of growing steers under intensive grazing conditions. Growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diet containing bird eye pepper of varying proportion and sieve size.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1