Nima Moradi, Mahdi Yazdani, Fatemeh Janbozorgi, Seyed Jafar Hashemi
{"title":"采用微观建模方法研究具有不同砖结合模式的历史砌体墙的平面内抗震性能","authors":"Nima Moradi, Mahdi Yazdani, Fatemeh Janbozorgi, Seyed Jafar Hashemi","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01085-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Masonry walls are the most important structural components of many magnificent historical buildings around the world. These ancient buildings are the core of tourism industry in countries and conserving them is vital. Various types of brickwork patterns of masonry walls have been observed in the existing architectural heritage. Therefore, the first aim of this study is to investigate the in-plane behavior of masonry walls with different brick bond patterns including Running, Double basketweave, 90-degree Herringbone, Spanish, Stacked and Combined stacked/running bonds, using nonlinear static analysis. The second purpose of this work is to evaluate the seismic performance of various walls as they are susceptible to damage under seismic excitations. To fulfill these aims, by using simplified micro-scale modeling technique, three-dimensional numerical models of walls were established in ABAQUS finite element package. Then, after validation of numerical models with the existed experimental data, the lateral capacity of walls was carried out under combined in-plane loads. Moreover, the seismic performance of walls was conducted by elastic demand spectrum for 475 years return period earthquake, according to the Iranian seismic code. This study found that historical walls with arbitrary brick bond patterns cannot withstand the possible seismic actions in high and very high earthquake-prone regions of Iran and just the Double basketweave bond and the Spanish bond can resist earthquakes in low and moderate seismic areas (0.2 g and 0.25 g). Hence, a sustainable retrofitting guideline for ancient masonry buildings should be planned in Iran. The results also revealed that the Double basketweave bond wall has the highest in-plane resistance among the brickwork arrangements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 6","pages":"4863 - 4876"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-plane seismic performance of historical masonry walls with various brick bond patterns using micro-modeling approach\",\"authors\":\"Nima Moradi, Mahdi Yazdani, Fatemeh Janbozorgi, Seyed Jafar Hashemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42107-024-01085-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Masonry walls are the most important structural components of many magnificent historical buildings around the world. These ancient buildings are the core of tourism industry in countries and conserving them is vital. Various types of brickwork patterns of masonry walls have been observed in the existing architectural heritage. Therefore, the first aim of this study is to investigate the in-plane behavior of masonry walls with different brick bond patterns including Running, Double basketweave, 90-degree Herringbone, Spanish, Stacked and Combined stacked/running bonds, using nonlinear static analysis. The second purpose of this work is to evaluate the seismic performance of various walls as they are susceptible to damage under seismic excitations. To fulfill these aims, by using simplified micro-scale modeling technique, three-dimensional numerical models of walls were established in ABAQUS finite element package. Then, after validation of numerical models with the existed experimental data, the lateral capacity of walls was carried out under combined in-plane loads. Moreover, the seismic performance of walls was conducted by elastic demand spectrum for 475 years return period earthquake, according to the Iranian seismic code. This study found that historical walls with arbitrary brick bond patterns cannot withstand the possible seismic actions in high and very high earthquake-prone regions of Iran and just the Double basketweave bond and the Spanish bond can resist earthquakes in low and moderate seismic areas (0.2 g and 0.25 g). Hence, a sustainable retrofitting guideline for ancient masonry buildings should be planned in Iran. The results also revealed that the Double basketweave bond wall has the highest in-plane resistance among the brickwork arrangements.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 6\",\"pages\":\"4863 - 4876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01085-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01085-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
砌体墙是世界各地许多宏伟历史建筑最重要的结构组成部分。这些古建筑是各国旅游业的核心,保护它们至关重要。在现存的建筑遗产中,可以观察到各种类型的砌墙砖砌图案。因此,本研究的第一个目的是利用非线性静态分析,研究具有不同砖结合模式的砌体墙的平面内行为,这些模式包括流水、双篓编织、90 度人字形、西班牙式、堆叠式和堆叠/流水结合式。这项工作的第二个目的是评估各种墙体的抗震性能,因为它们在地震激励下很容易损坏。为了实现这些目标,我们使用简化的微尺度建模技术,在 ABAQUS 有限元软件包中建立了墙体的三维数值模型。然后,根据已有的实验数据对数值模型进行了验证,并对墙体在面内组合荷载作用下的抗侧能力进行了研究。此外,还根据伊朗地震规范,通过 475 年重现期地震的弹性需求谱对墙体的抗震性能进行了评估。这项研究发现,在伊朗地震高发区和极高发区,采用任意砖块粘结模式的历史墙体无法抵御可能发生的地震作用,而在低度和中度地震区(0.2 g 和 0.25 g),只有双篮编织粘结和西班牙粘结能够抵御地震。因此,应为伊朗的古砌体建筑规划一个可持续的改造指南。研究结果还显示,在各种砖砌结构中,双篮织结合墙的平面抗震性最高。
In-plane seismic performance of historical masonry walls with various brick bond patterns using micro-modeling approach
Masonry walls are the most important structural components of many magnificent historical buildings around the world. These ancient buildings are the core of tourism industry in countries and conserving them is vital. Various types of brickwork patterns of masonry walls have been observed in the existing architectural heritage. Therefore, the first aim of this study is to investigate the in-plane behavior of masonry walls with different brick bond patterns including Running, Double basketweave, 90-degree Herringbone, Spanish, Stacked and Combined stacked/running bonds, using nonlinear static analysis. The second purpose of this work is to evaluate the seismic performance of various walls as they are susceptible to damage under seismic excitations. To fulfill these aims, by using simplified micro-scale modeling technique, three-dimensional numerical models of walls were established in ABAQUS finite element package. Then, after validation of numerical models with the existed experimental data, the lateral capacity of walls was carried out under combined in-plane loads. Moreover, the seismic performance of walls was conducted by elastic demand spectrum for 475 years return period earthquake, according to the Iranian seismic code. This study found that historical walls with arbitrary brick bond patterns cannot withstand the possible seismic actions in high and very high earthquake-prone regions of Iran and just the Double basketweave bond and the Spanish bond can resist earthquakes in low and moderate seismic areas (0.2 g and 0.25 g). Hence, a sustainable retrofitting guideline for ancient masonry buildings should be planned in Iran. The results also revealed that the Double basketweave bond wall has the highest in-plane resistance among the brickwork arrangements.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt. Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate: a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.