医学教育中的批判性思维教学实践:系统回顾

Beatriz Araújo, Sandra F. Gomes, Laura Ribeiro
{"title":"医学教育中的批判性思维教学实践:系统回顾","authors":"Beatriz Araújo, Sandra F. Gomes, Laura Ribeiro","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1358444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of critical thinking (CT) has been a universal goal in higher education. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of currently used pedagogical practices to foster CT/ clinical reasoning (CR)/ clinical judgment (CJ) skills and/or dispositions in undergraduate medical students.PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched from January 2010 to April 2021 with a predefined Boolean expression.Of the 3221 articles originally identified, 33 articles were included by using PICOS methodology. From these, 21 (64%) reported CR pedagogical practices and 12 (36%) CT pedagogical practices.Overall, pedagogical practices such as cognitive/visual representation, simulation, literature exposure, test-enhancing and team-based learning, clinical case discussion, error-based learning, game-based learning seem to enhance CT/CR skills and/or dispositions. Further research is required to identify the optimal timing, duration and modality of pedagogical interventions for effectively foster CT/CR in medical education.","PeriodicalId":502302,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical thinking pedagogical practices in medical education: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Araújo, Sandra F. Gomes, Laura Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1358444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of critical thinking (CT) has been a universal goal in higher education. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of currently used pedagogical practices to foster CT/ clinical reasoning (CR)/ clinical judgment (CJ) skills and/or dispositions in undergraduate medical students.PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched from January 2010 to April 2021 with a predefined Boolean expression.Of the 3221 articles originally identified, 33 articles were included by using PICOS methodology. From these, 21 (64%) reported CR pedagogical practices and 12 (36%) CT pedagogical practices.Overall, pedagogical practices such as cognitive/visual representation, simulation, literature exposure, test-enhancing and team-based learning, clinical case discussion, error-based learning, game-based learning seem to enhance CT/CR skills and/or dispositions. Further research is required to identify the optimal timing, duration and modality of pedagogical interventions for effectively foster CT/CR in medical education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1358444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1358444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

培养批判性思维(CT)一直是高等教育的普遍目标。我们对文献进行了系统性回顾,以评估目前使用的教学实践对培养本科医学生的CT/临床推理(CR)/临床判断(CJ)技能和/或处置能力的有效性。总体而言,认知/视觉呈现、模拟、文献接触、强化测试和团队学习、临床病例讨论、基于错误的学习、基于游戏的学习等教学实践似乎能提高 CT/CR 技能和/或处置能力。要在医学教育中有效培养 CT/CR 能力,还需要进一步研究确定教学干预的最佳时机、持续时间和方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical thinking pedagogical practices in medical education: a systematic review
The development of critical thinking (CT) has been a universal goal in higher education. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of currently used pedagogical practices to foster CT/ clinical reasoning (CR)/ clinical judgment (CJ) skills and/or dispositions in undergraduate medical students.PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched from January 2010 to April 2021 with a predefined Boolean expression.Of the 3221 articles originally identified, 33 articles were included by using PICOS methodology. From these, 21 (64%) reported CR pedagogical practices and 12 (36%) CT pedagogical practices.Overall, pedagogical practices such as cognitive/visual representation, simulation, literature exposure, test-enhancing and team-based learning, clinical case discussion, error-based learning, game-based learning seem to enhance CT/CR skills and/or dispositions. Further research is required to identify the optimal timing, duration and modality of pedagogical interventions for effectively foster CT/CR in medical education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mycobacterium marinum hand infection: a case report and literature review Strengthening surgical healthcare research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: impact of a research training programme in Nigeria Association between serum vitamin D and the risk of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes Maternal puerperal infection caused by Parabacteroides goldsteinii: a case report Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in a patient with polycystic kidney disease without underlying risk factors: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1