带预测的在线单位利润包

IF 0.9 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Algorithmica Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s00453-024-01239-y
Joan Boyar, Lene M. Favrholdt, Kim S. Larsen
{"title":"带预测的在线单位利润包","authors":"Joan Boyar,&nbsp;Lene M. Favrholdt,&nbsp;Kim S. Larsen","doi":"10.1007/s00453-024-01239-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A variant of the online knapsack problem is considered in the setting of predictions. In Unit Profit Knapsack, the items have unit profit, i.e., the goal is to pack as many items as possible. For Online Unit Profit Knapsack, the competitive ratio is unbounded. In contrast, it is easy to find an optimal solution offline: Pack as many of the smallest items as possible into the knapsack. The prediction available to the online algorithm is the average size of those smallest items that fit in the knapsack. For the prediction error in this hard online problem, we use the ratio <span>\\(r=\\frac{a}{\\hat{a}}\\)</span> where <i>a</i> is the actual value for this average size and <span>\\(\\hat{a}\\)</span> is the prediction. We give an algorithm which is <span>\\(\\frac{e-1}{e}\\)</span>-competitive, if <span>\\(r=1\\)</span>, and this is best possible among online algorithms knowing <i>a</i> and nothing else. More generally, the algorithm has a competitive ratio of <span>\\(\\frac{e-1}{e}r\\)</span>, if <span>\\(r \\le 1\\)</span>, and <span>\\(\\frac{e-r}{e}r\\)</span>, if <span>\\(1 \\le r &lt; e\\)</span>. Any algorithm with a better competitive ratio for some <span>\\(r&lt;1\\)</span> will have a worse competitive ratio for some <span>\\(r&gt;1\\)</span>. To obtain a positive competitive ratio for all <i>r</i>, we adjust the algorithm, resulting in a competitive ratio of <span>\\(\\frac{1}{2r}\\)</span> for <span>\\(r\\ge 1\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\frac{r}{2}\\)</span> for <span>\\(r\\le 1\\)</span>. We show that improving the result for any <span>\\(r&lt; 1\\)</span> leads to a worse result for some <span>\\(r&gt;1\\)</span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50824,"journal":{"name":"Algorithmica","volume":"86 9","pages":"2786 - 2821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00453-024-01239-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Unit Profit Knapsack with Predictions\",\"authors\":\"Joan Boyar,&nbsp;Lene M. Favrholdt,&nbsp;Kim S. Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00453-024-01239-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A variant of the online knapsack problem is considered in the setting of predictions. In Unit Profit Knapsack, the items have unit profit, i.e., the goal is to pack as many items as possible. For Online Unit Profit Knapsack, the competitive ratio is unbounded. In contrast, it is easy to find an optimal solution offline: Pack as many of the smallest items as possible into the knapsack. The prediction available to the online algorithm is the average size of those smallest items that fit in the knapsack. For the prediction error in this hard online problem, we use the ratio <span>\\\\(r=\\\\frac{a}{\\\\hat{a}}\\\\)</span> where <i>a</i> is the actual value for this average size and <span>\\\\(\\\\hat{a}\\\\)</span> is the prediction. We give an algorithm which is <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{e-1}{e}\\\\)</span>-competitive, if <span>\\\\(r=1\\\\)</span>, and this is best possible among online algorithms knowing <i>a</i> and nothing else. More generally, the algorithm has a competitive ratio of <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{e-1}{e}r\\\\)</span>, if <span>\\\\(r \\\\le 1\\\\)</span>, and <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{e-r}{e}r\\\\)</span>, if <span>\\\\(1 \\\\le r &lt; e\\\\)</span>. Any algorithm with a better competitive ratio for some <span>\\\\(r&lt;1\\\\)</span> will have a worse competitive ratio for some <span>\\\\(r&gt;1\\\\)</span>. To obtain a positive competitive ratio for all <i>r</i>, we adjust the algorithm, resulting in a competitive ratio of <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{1}{2r}\\\\)</span> for <span>\\\\(r\\\\ge 1\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(\\\\frac{r}{2}\\\\)</span> for <span>\\\\(r\\\\le 1\\\\)</span>. We show that improving the result for any <span>\\\\(r&lt; 1\\\\)</span> leads to a worse result for some <span>\\\\(r&gt;1\\\\)</span>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algorithmica\",\"volume\":\"86 9\",\"pages\":\"2786 - 2821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00453-024-01239-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algorithmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00453-024-01239-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithmica","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00453-024-01239-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在预测的背景下,我们考虑了在线可纳包问题的一个变体。在单位利润包中,物品具有单位利润,即目标是尽可能多地打包物品。对于在线单位利润可纳包,竞争率是无限制的。相比之下,很容易找到离线最优解:将尽可能多的最小物品装入背包。在线算法可以利用的预测结果是装入背包的最小物品的平均尺寸。对于这个困难的在线问题的预测误差,我们使用比率(r=\frac{a}{\hat{a}}\),其中 a 是这个平均大小的实际值,\(\hat{a}\) 是预测值。如果 \(r=1\) ,我们给出的算法是具有竞争性的(\(frac{e-1}{e}\),这在知道 a 而不知道其他信息的在线算法中是最好的。更一般地说,如果(r=1),算法的竞争率是(\frac{e-1}{e}r\);如果(r=1),算法的竞争率是(\frac{e-r}{e}r\)。任何算法在某些(r<1\)情况下具有较好的竞争比率,在某些(r>1\)情况下就会具有较差的竞争比率。为了获得对所有r的正竞争比率,我们调整了算法,结果是对(r\ge 1\ )的竞争比率为(\frac{1}{2r}\ ),对(r\le 1\ )的竞争比率为(\frac{r}{2}\ )。我们证明,对任何(r< 1\) 结果的改进都会导致对某些(r> 1\) 结果的恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Online Unit Profit Knapsack with Predictions

A variant of the online knapsack problem is considered in the setting of predictions. In Unit Profit Knapsack, the items have unit profit, i.e., the goal is to pack as many items as possible. For Online Unit Profit Knapsack, the competitive ratio is unbounded. In contrast, it is easy to find an optimal solution offline: Pack as many of the smallest items as possible into the knapsack. The prediction available to the online algorithm is the average size of those smallest items that fit in the knapsack. For the prediction error in this hard online problem, we use the ratio \(r=\frac{a}{\hat{a}}\) where a is the actual value for this average size and \(\hat{a}\) is the prediction. We give an algorithm which is \(\frac{e-1}{e}\)-competitive, if \(r=1\), and this is best possible among online algorithms knowing a and nothing else. More generally, the algorithm has a competitive ratio of \(\frac{e-1}{e}r\), if \(r \le 1\), and \(\frac{e-r}{e}r\), if \(1 \le r < e\). Any algorithm with a better competitive ratio for some \(r<1\) will have a worse competitive ratio for some \(r>1\). To obtain a positive competitive ratio for all r, we adjust the algorithm, resulting in a competitive ratio of \(\frac{1}{2r}\) for \(r\ge 1\) and \(\frac{r}{2}\) for \(r\le 1\). We show that improving the result for any \(r< 1\) leads to a worse result for some \(r>1\).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Algorithmica
Algorithmica 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Algorithmica is an international journal which publishes theoretical papers on algorithms that address problems arising in practical areas, and experimental papers of general appeal for practical importance or techniques. The development of algorithms is an integral part of computer science. The increasing complexity and scope of computer applications makes the design of efficient algorithms essential. Algorithmica covers algorithms in applied areas such as: VLSI, distributed computing, parallel processing, automated design, robotics, graphics, data base design, software tools, as well as algorithms in fundamental areas such as sorting, searching, data structures, computational geometry, and linear programming. In addition, the journal features two special sections: Application Experience, presenting findings obtained from applications of theoretical results to practical situations, and Problems, offering short papers presenting problems on selected topics of computer science.
期刊最新文献
Energy Constrained Depth First Search Recovering the Original Simplicity: Succinct and Exact Quantum Algorithm for the Welded Tree Problem Permutation-constrained Common String Partitions with Applications Reachability of Fair Allocations via Sequential Exchanges On Flipping the Fréchet Distance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1