低地森林中岔道深度的测量方法

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.3390/f15061021
Mihael Lovrincevic, Ivica Papa, Maja Popović, D. Janeš, T. Porsinsky, Tibor Pentek, Andreja Đuka
{"title":"低地森林中岔道深度的测量方法","authors":"Mihael Lovrincevic, Ivica Papa, Maja Popović, D. Janeš, T. Porsinsky, Tibor Pentek, Andreja Đuka","doi":"10.3390/f15061021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rutting measurements are a significant part of scientific research on the impact of forest vehicles on the forest soils and damage to the forest transport infrastructure. Although photogrammetric methods of measurement or measurements based on LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data are increasingly being used for rutting measurements, the previous research conducted using these methods indicated the challenge of recording water-filled ruts. For this reason, it is necessary to define a reliable method of rutting field measurement in lowland forest stands characterized by a high level of groundwater that fills the ruts shortly after the passage of forest vehicles. This research analyzed the measurement accuracy using a total station and a GNSS RTK device with a CROPOS correction base in relation to the measuring rod that represented the reference method. Based on recorded and processed data, ruts are displayed in two ways: as net and as gross value of rut depth. The analysis of net rutting revealed a statistically significant difference between the calculated rut depths based on measurements with a GNSS RTK device and other methods. On average, the net rutting measured by the GNSS RTK device was 2.86 cm smaller than that of the reference method. When calculating the gross rutting, which consisted of the net rut depth and the bulge height, no statistically significant difference was found between the measurement methods used. Based on this result, the bulge height was also analyzed, and showed a statistically significant difference between the data recorded by the GNSS RTK device and other methods. It can be concluded that measuring the depth of ruts with a total station gives accurate data and represents the optimal modern field measurement method for the same or similar terrain conditions. In contrast, the GNSS RTK device, which constantly gives higher elevation points, can be used to measure gross rutting.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"142 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods of Rut Depth Measurements on Forwarder Trails in Lowland Forest\",\"authors\":\"Mihael Lovrincevic, Ivica Papa, Maja Popović, D. Janeš, T. Porsinsky, Tibor Pentek, Andreja Đuka\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/f15061021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rutting measurements are a significant part of scientific research on the impact of forest vehicles on the forest soils and damage to the forest transport infrastructure. Although photogrammetric methods of measurement or measurements based on LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data are increasingly being used for rutting measurements, the previous research conducted using these methods indicated the challenge of recording water-filled ruts. For this reason, it is necessary to define a reliable method of rutting field measurement in lowland forest stands characterized by a high level of groundwater that fills the ruts shortly after the passage of forest vehicles. This research analyzed the measurement accuracy using a total station and a GNSS RTK device with a CROPOS correction base in relation to the measuring rod that represented the reference method. Based on recorded and processed data, ruts are displayed in two ways: as net and as gross value of rut depth. The analysis of net rutting revealed a statistically significant difference between the calculated rut depths based on measurements with a GNSS RTK device and other methods. On average, the net rutting measured by the GNSS RTK device was 2.86 cm smaller than that of the reference method. When calculating the gross rutting, which consisted of the net rut depth and the bulge height, no statistically significant difference was found between the measurement methods used. Based on this result, the bulge height was also analyzed, and showed a statistically significant difference between the data recorded by the GNSS RTK device and other methods. It can be concluded that measuring the depth of ruts with a total station gives accurate data and represents the optimal modern field measurement method for the same or similar terrain conditions. In contrast, the GNSS RTK device, which constantly gives higher elevation points, can be used to measure gross rutting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"142 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/f15061021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/f15061021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

车辙测量是有关森林车辆对森林土壤影响和森林运输基础设施损害的科学研究的重要组成部分。虽然摄影测量方法或基于激光雷达(光探测和测距)数据的测量方法正越来越多地用于车辙测量,但以往使用这些方法进行的研究表明,记录充满水的车辙是一项挑战。因此,有必要确定一种可靠的车辙实地测量方法,用于低地林分的车辙测量,因为低地林分的特点是地下水位较高,在森林车辆通过后不久就会充满车辙。这项研究分析了使用全站仪和带有 CROPOS 修正基座的 GNSS RTK 设备与代表参考方法的测量杆之间的测量精度。根据记录和处理的数据,车辙以两种方式显示:车辙深度的净值和总值。对车辙净值的分析表明,根据全球导航卫星系统 RTK 设备的测量结果计算出的车辙深度与其他方法计算出的车辙深度之间存在显著的统计学差异。平均而言,GNSS RTK 设备测得的净车辙比参考方法小 2.86 厘米。在计算由净车辙深度和隆起高度组成的总车辙时,所使用的测量方法之间没有发现明显的统计学差异。在此基础上,还对隆起高度进行了分析,结果表明全球导航卫星系统 RTK 设备记录的数据与其他方法记录的数据在统计学上存在显著差异。由此可以得出结论,使用全站仪测量车辙深度可以获得准确的数据,是相同或类似地形条件下最佳的现代实地测量方法。相比之下,全球导航卫星系统 RTK 设备不断提供更高的高程点,可用于测量总车辙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods of Rut Depth Measurements on Forwarder Trails in Lowland Forest
Rutting measurements are a significant part of scientific research on the impact of forest vehicles on the forest soils and damage to the forest transport infrastructure. Although photogrammetric methods of measurement or measurements based on LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data are increasingly being used for rutting measurements, the previous research conducted using these methods indicated the challenge of recording water-filled ruts. For this reason, it is necessary to define a reliable method of rutting field measurement in lowland forest stands characterized by a high level of groundwater that fills the ruts shortly after the passage of forest vehicles. This research analyzed the measurement accuracy using a total station and a GNSS RTK device with a CROPOS correction base in relation to the measuring rod that represented the reference method. Based on recorded and processed data, ruts are displayed in two ways: as net and as gross value of rut depth. The analysis of net rutting revealed a statistically significant difference between the calculated rut depths based on measurements with a GNSS RTK device and other methods. On average, the net rutting measured by the GNSS RTK device was 2.86 cm smaller than that of the reference method. When calculating the gross rutting, which consisted of the net rut depth and the bulge height, no statistically significant difference was found between the measurement methods used. Based on this result, the bulge height was also analyzed, and showed a statistically significant difference between the data recorded by the GNSS RTK device and other methods. It can be concluded that measuring the depth of ruts with a total station gives accurate data and represents the optimal modern field measurement method for the same or similar terrain conditions. In contrast, the GNSS RTK device, which constantly gives higher elevation points, can be used to measure gross rutting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Chk1-Targeted Hesperidin Liposomes for Breast Cancer Therapy: An Integrated In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Evaluation. Machine Learning-Assisted Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Sensor for Point-of-Care Vancomycin Monitoring in Serum. Comments on "A Polymeric Nanocarrier Platform for Rapid and Precise Fatty Acid Tracing in Cells". Protein Fibril-Based Intracellular Sono-Piezocatalysis via Nanoparticle-Enhanced Piezoelectricity. AI-Enhanced Nanophotonic Heterochain Sensor Enables Multiplexed Biomarker Detection across Serum, Urine, and Saliva for Stroke Differentiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1