评估农业景观中的土壤侵蚀及其驱动因素:巴西巴伊亚州南部的案例研究

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 WATER RESOURCES Journal of Water and Climate Change Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.2166/wcc.2024.147
Mathurin François, Maria Carolina Gonçalves Pontes, R. N. De Vasconcelos, Ulisses Costa de Oliveira, Heraldo Peixoto da Silva, Deborah Faria, E. Mariano‐Neto
{"title":"评估农业景观中的土壤侵蚀及其驱动因素:巴西巴伊亚州南部的案例研究","authors":"Mathurin François, Maria Carolina Gonçalves Pontes, R. N. De Vasconcelos, Ulisses Costa de Oliveira, Heraldo Peixoto da Silva, Deborah Faria, E. Mariano‐Neto","doi":"10.2166/wcc.2024.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Erosion is a worldwide threat to biodiversity conservation and agricultural yield, and it is linked to deforestation. In this study, we aim to assess soil loss in landscapes of the Cachoeira River watershed, in southern Bahia, northeastern Brazil. We estimate the role of forests in diminishing soil erosion using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). We compare real and simulated scenarios in which the forest was replaced by agricultural use, also comparing estimates of erosivity factor (R factor) derived from remote sensing and climatological station data. Real and simulated annual soil losses varied from 0 to 167.87 t/year and from 0 to 351.81 t/year along the watershed, respectively. However, only 0.04 and 1.67% of this area is highly and severely exposed to erosion, using data from climatological stations and remote sensing, respectively. We showed that soil loss in the simulated deforested scenario was approximately two times higher than the real annual soil loss, indicating the importance of forest cover to mitigate soil erosion. Moreover, soil loss was 10.5 times greater when using precipitation data from remote sensing compared to climatological stations. Conclusively, the practice of agroforestry can be used as an alternative to avoid erosion.","PeriodicalId":49150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water and Climate Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing soil erosion and its drivers in agricultural landscapes: a case study in southern Bahia, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Mathurin François, Maria Carolina Gonçalves Pontes, R. N. De Vasconcelos, Ulisses Costa de Oliveira, Heraldo Peixoto da Silva, Deborah Faria, E. Mariano‐Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wcc.2024.147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Erosion is a worldwide threat to biodiversity conservation and agricultural yield, and it is linked to deforestation. In this study, we aim to assess soil loss in landscapes of the Cachoeira River watershed, in southern Bahia, northeastern Brazil. We estimate the role of forests in diminishing soil erosion using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). We compare real and simulated scenarios in which the forest was replaced by agricultural use, also comparing estimates of erosivity factor (R factor) derived from remote sensing and climatological station data. Real and simulated annual soil losses varied from 0 to 167.87 t/year and from 0 to 351.81 t/year along the watershed, respectively. However, only 0.04 and 1.67% of this area is highly and severely exposed to erosion, using data from climatological stations and remote sensing, respectively. We showed that soil loss in the simulated deforested scenario was approximately two times higher than the real annual soil loss, indicating the importance of forest cover to mitigate soil erosion. Moreover, soil loss was 10.5 times greater when using precipitation data from remote sensing compared to climatological stations. Conclusively, the practice of agroforestry can be used as an alternative to avoid erosion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water and Climate Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water and Climate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water and Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水土流失是对生物多样性保护和农业产量的世界性威胁,它与森林砍伐有关。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估巴西东北部巴伊亚州南部卡乔埃拉河流域的土壤流失情况。我们使用修订的通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)估算了森林在减少土壤侵蚀方面的作用。我们比较了森林被农业用途取代的真实情景和模拟情景,还比较了从遥感和气候站数据中得出的侵蚀因子(R因子)估算值。实际和模拟的流域土壤年流失量分别为 0 至 167.87 吨/年和 0 至 351.81 吨/年。然而,根据气候站和遥感数据,该流域仅有 0.04% 和 1.67% 的区域受到严重侵蚀。我们的研究表明,模拟毁林情景下的土壤流失量约为实际年土壤流失量的两倍,这表明森林植被对减轻土壤侵蚀的重要性。此外,使用遥感降水数据时,土壤流失量是气候站数据的 10.5 倍。总之,农林业可作为避免水土流失的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing soil erosion and its drivers in agricultural landscapes: a case study in southern Bahia, Brazil
Erosion is a worldwide threat to biodiversity conservation and agricultural yield, and it is linked to deforestation. In this study, we aim to assess soil loss in landscapes of the Cachoeira River watershed, in southern Bahia, northeastern Brazil. We estimate the role of forests in diminishing soil erosion using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). We compare real and simulated scenarios in which the forest was replaced by agricultural use, also comparing estimates of erosivity factor (R factor) derived from remote sensing and climatological station data. Real and simulated annual soil losses varied from 0 to 167.87 t/year and from 0 to 351.81 t/year along the watershed, respectively. However, only 0.04 and 1.67% of this area is highly and severely exposed to erosion, using data from climatological stations and remote sensing, respectively. We showed that soil loss in the simulated deforested scenario was approximately two times higher than the real annual soil loss, indicating the importance of forest cover to mitigate soil erosion. Moreover, soil loss was 10.5 times greater when using precipitation data from remote sensing compared to climatological stations. Conclusively, the practice of agroforestry can be used as an alternative to avoid erosion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
168
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Water and Climate Change publishes refereed research and practitioner papers on all aspects of water science, technology, management and innovation in response to climate change, with emphasis on reduction of energy usage.
期刊最新文献
Morpho-hydrodynamic processes impacted by the 2022 extreme La Niña event and high river discharge conditions in the southern coast of West Java, Indonesia Impacts of climate change and variability on drought characteristics and challenges on sorghum productivity in Babile District, Eastern Ethiopia Monitoring the effects of climate change and topography on vegetation health in Tharparkar, Pakistan Elevation-dependent effects of snowfall and snow cover changes on runoff variations at the source regions of the Yellow River basin Meta-learning applied to a multivariate single-step fusion model for greenhouse gas emission forecasting in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1