在 COVID-19 大流行期间,胁迫性压力对可持续发展目标报告的影响:一项国际研究

IF 9.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1002/sd.3076
Tiyas Kurnia Sari, M. Sholihin, Singgih Wijayana
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,胁迫性压力对可持续发展目标报告的影响:一项国际研究","authors":"Tiyas Kurnia Sari, M. Sholihin, Singgih Wijayana","doi":"10.1002/sd.3076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sustainable development goals (SDGs) are recognized as global development guidelines for 2030. The accounting profession can contribute to achieving these goals by encouraging reporting on SDGs at the company level. The increasing awareness of the contribution of businesses to the achievement of the SDGs is one of the reasons for the improvement in the practice of reporting by companies. This research is secondary data‐based accounting research that aims to analyze the quality of reporting on SDGs and whether coercive pressures in the form of regulatory quality, sustainability regulations, and the strength of audit and reporting standards were determinants of the quality of reporting on SDGs in the era of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The results of this study show that, on average, companies reported on 10 of the SDGs (56% of the 17) during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Further, this study found that coercive pressures in the form of regulatory quality, sustainability regulations, and the strength of audit and reporting standards positively affected the quality of reporting at the country and company levels. These results may imply that reporting on SDGs in the pandemic era was defensive reporting that sought to maintain legitimacy and was mainly driven by formal pressures.","PeriodicalId":48174,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of coercive pressures on reporting on SDGs during the COVID‐19 pandemic: An international study\",\"authors\":\"Tiyas Kurnia Sari, M. Sholihin, Singgih Wijayana\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sd.3076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The sustainable development goals (SDGs) are recognized as global development guidelines for 2030. The accounting profession can contribute to achieving these goals by encouraging reporting on SDGs at the company level. The increasing awareness of the contribution of businesses to the achievement of the SDGs is one of the reasons for the improvement in the practice of reporting by companies. This research is secondary data‐based accounting research that aims to analyze the quality of reporting on SDGs and whether coercive pressures in the form of regulatory quality, sustainability regulations, and the strength of audit and reporting standards were determinants of the quality of reporting on SDGs in the era of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The results of this study show that, on average, companies reported on 10 of the SDGs (56% of the 17) during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Further, this study found that coercive pressures in the form of regulatory quality, sustainability regulations, and the strength of audit and reporting standards positively affected the quality of reporting at the country and company levels. These results may imply that reporting on SDGs in the pandemic era was defensive reporting that sought to maintain legitimacy and was mainly driven by formal pressures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3076\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展目标(SDGs)被视为 2030 年的全球发展指导方针。会计行业可以通过鼓励在公司层面报告可持续发展目标,为实现这些目标做出贡献。企业对实现可持续发展目标所作贡献的认识不断提高,这也是企业改进报告实践的原因之一。本研究是基于二手数据的会计研究,旨在分析可持续发展目标报告的质量,以及在 COVID-19 大流行的时代,监管质量、可持续发展法规、审计和报告标准的力度等形式的强制压力是否是可持续发展目标报告质量的决定因素。研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,公司平均报告了 10 个可持续发展目标(占 17 个目标的 56%)。此外,本研究还发现,监管质量、可持续发展法规以及审计和报告标准的力度等形式的强制压力对国家和公司层面的报告质量产生了积极影响。这些结果可能意味着,大流行病时期的可持续发展目标报告是一种防御性报告,旨在维护合法性,主要由正式压力驱动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of coercive pressures on reporting on SDGs during the COVID‐19 pandemic: An international study
The sustainable development goals (SDGs) are recognized as global development guidelines for 2030. The accounting profession can contribute to achieving these goals by encouraging reporting on SDGs at the company level. The increasing awareness of the contribution of businesses to the achievement of the SDGs is one of the reasons for the improvement in the practice of reporting by companies. This research is secondary data‐based accounting research that aims to analyze the quality of reporting on SDGs and whether coercive pressures in the form of regulatory quality, sustainability regulations, and the strength of audit and reporting standards were determinants of the quality of reporting on SDGs in the era of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The results of this study show that, on average, companies reported on 10 of the SDGs (56% of the 17) during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Further, this study found that coercive pressures in the form of regulatory quality, sustainability regulations, and the strength of audit and reporting standards positively affected the quality of reporting at the country and company levels. These results may imply that reporting on SDGs in the pandemic era was defensive reporting that sought to maintain legitimacy and was mainly driven by formal pressures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
11.20%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: Sustainable Development is a publication that takes an interdisciplinary approach to explore and propose strategies for achieving sustainable development. Our aim is to discuss and address the challenges associated with sustainable development and the Sustainable Development Goals. All submissions are subjected to a thorough review process to ensure that our readers receive valuable and original content of the highest caliber.
期刊最新文献
Resilience in action: Kosovo's National Development Strategy to incorporate sustainable development goals Extended producer responsibility in e‐waste recycling: A secure path to a sustainable future for UAE The relationship between culture and sustainable development goal compliance at the municipal level How can corporate digital responsibility (CDR) be measured in line with corporate social responsibility (CSR)? A new theoretical approach in construction 4.0 Sustainable development of local livelihoods in Vietnam: A demand‐driven approach through “One Commune, One Product”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1