不同风道配置的无人机螺旋桨的数值研究和性能比较

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1108/aeat-12-2023-0348
Jagan Raj R., Gowtham G.
{"title":"不同风道配置的无人机螺旋桨的数值研究和性能比较","authors":"Jagan Raj R., Gowtham G.","doi":"10.1108/aeat-12-2023-0348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of propeller thrust with two different duct configurations. Propellers in a quadcopter play an indispensable role in generating the necessary thrust and torque to keep the drone flying and manoeuvring. Based on the specific purpose of the unmanned aerial vehicle, both the altitude and attitude can be varied by the amount of thrust produced.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper deals with the generation of three numerical models such as plain rotor, rotor with fixed duct and rotor with rotating duct and the comparison of their amount of generated thrust. The plain rotor numerical analysis was compared with the experimental results. The rotor taken for the analysis was 15 mm*5.5 mm TAROT 650. Thrust was measured for all models at four different angular speeds, such as 2,500 rpm, 4,000 rpm, 5,500 rpm and 7,000 rpm.\n\nFindings\nDue to the suction pressure gradient on the duct inlet surface, the additional amount of lift is produced, and it is the best way of increasing propulsion efficiency and its aerodynamic performance as it reduces the tip loss at the tip of the propeller. The turbulence model taken for the numerical analysis was k−ε.\n\nOriginality/value\nThe rotating duct is expected to provide additional thrust by the increased upward force due to the rotation of duct. The rotating duct produced the optimal results between the plain model and ducted model. At the highest speed of 7,000 rpm, the ducted propeller produced 24.97 N, and the rotating duct propeller produced 23.89 N, whereas the plain propeller produced 23 N thrust. Nearly 8.6% of the thrust improvement is observed in duct and 3.87% in rotating duct.\n","PeriodicalId":55540,"journal":{"name":"Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical investigation and performance comparison of UAV propeller with varying duct configuration\",\"authors\":\"Jagan Raj R., Gowtham G.\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/aeat-12-2023-0348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of propeller thrust with two different duct configurations. Propellers in a quadcopter play an indispensable role in generating the necessary thrust and torque to keep the drone flying and manoeuvring. Based on the specific purpose of the unmanned aerial vehicle, both the altitude and attitude can be varied by the amount of thrust produced.\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper deals with the generation of three numerical models such as plain rotor, rotor with fixed duct and rotor with rotating duct and the comparison of their amount of generated thrust. The plain rotor numerical analysis was compared with the experimental results. The rotor taken for the analysis was 15 mm*5.5 mm TAROT 650. Thrust was measured for all models at four different angular speeds, such as 2,500 rpm, 4,000 rpm, 5,500 rpm and 7,000 rpm.\\n\\nFindings\\nDue to the suction pressure gradient on the duct inlet surface, the additional amount of lift is produced, and it is the best way of increasing propulsion efficiency and its aerodynamic performance as it reduces the tip loss at the tip of the propeller. The turbulence model taken for the numerical analysis was k−ε.\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe rotating duct is expected to provide additional thrust by the increased upward force due to the rotation of duct. The rotating duct produced the optimal results between the plain model and ducted model. At the highest speed of 7,000 rpm, the ducted propeller produced 24.97 N, and the rotating duct propeller produced 23.89 N, whereas the plain propeller produced 23 N thrust. Nearly 8.6% of the thrust improvement is observed in duct and 3.87% in rotating duct.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":55540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-12-2023-0348\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-12-2023-0348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在探讨螺旋桨推力对两种不同风道配置的影响。四旋翼无人机的螺旋桨在产生必要的推力和扭矩以保持无人机飞行和操纵方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。根据无人飞行器的具体用途,可以通过产生的推力大小来改变飞行高度和姿态。设计/方法/途径 本文涉及三种数值模型的生成,如普通旋翼、带固定导管的旋翼和带旋转导管的旋翼,以及它们产生的推力大小的比较。普通转子的数值分析与实验结果进行了比较。用于分析的转子是 15 毫米*5.5 毫米的 TAROT 650。在四种不同角速度(如 2,500 rpm、4,000 rpm、5,500 rpm 和 7,000 rpm)下测量了所有模型的推力。 研究结果由于管道入口表面的吸力压力梯度,产生了额外的升力,这是提高推进效率和气动性能的最佳方法,因为它减少了螺旋桨顶端的尖端损失。数值分析所采用的湍流模型为 k-ε。旋转风道在普通模型和风道模型之间产生了最佳结果。在最高转速 7,000 rpm 时,带风道螺旋桨产生 24.97 N 推力,旋转风道螺旋桨产生 23.89 N 推力,而普通螺旋桨产生 23 N 推力。风道式螺旋桨的推力提高了近 8.6%,旋转风道式螺旋桨的推力提高了 3.87%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical investigation and performance comparison of UAV propeller with varying duct configuration
Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of propeller thrust with two different duct configurations. Propellers in a quadcopter play an indispensable role in generating the necessary thrust and torque to keep the drone flying and manoeuvring. Based on the specific purpose of the unmanned aerial vehicle, both the altitude and attitude can be varied by the amount of thrust produced. Design/methodology/approach This paper deals with the generation of three numerical models such as plain rotor, rotor with fixed duct and rotor with rotating duct and the comparison of their amount of generated thrust. The plain rotor numerical analysis was compared with the experimental results. The rotor taken for the analysis was 15 mm*5.5 mm TAROT 650. Thrust was measured for all models at four different angular speeds, such as 2,500 rpm, 4,000 rpm, 5,500 rpm and 7,000 rpm. Findings Due to the suction pressure gradient on the duct inlet surface, the additional amount of lift is produced, and it is the best way of increasing propulsion efficiency and its aerodynamic performance as it reduces the tip loss at the tip of the propeller. The turbulence model taken for the numerical analysis was k−ε. Originality/value The rotating duct is expected to provide additional thrust by the increased upward force due to the rotation of duct. The rotating duct produced the optimal results between the plain model and ducted model. At the highest speed of 7,000 rpm, the ducted propeller produced 24.97 N, and the rotating duct propeller produced 23.89 N, whereas the plain propeller produced 23 N thrust. Nearly 8.6% of the thrust improvement is observed in duct and 3.87% in rotating duct.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology
Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
168
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology provides a broad coverage of the materials and techniques employed in the aircraft and aerospace industry. Its international perspectives allow readers to keep up to date with current thinking and developments in critical areas such as coping with increasingly overcrowded airways, the development of new materials, recent breakthroughs in navigation technology - and more.
期刊最新文献
Wind tunnel investigation of hemispherical forebody interaction on the drag coefficient of a D-shaped model Parameter tuning for active disturbance rejection control of fixed-wing UAV based on improved bald eagle search algorithm Integrating urban air mobility into smart cities: a proposal for relevant use cases in the next decades Heavy fuel preparation effects on the operation of a spark ignition unmanned aerial vehicle engine Flame stabilization and emission reduction: a comprehensive study on the influence of swirl velocity in hydrogen fuel-based burner design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1