平台趋同还是分歧?比较数字和社交媒体平台上的政治广告内容

Travis N. Ridout, Markus Neumann, Jielu Yao, Laura M. Baum, Michael M. Franz, P. Oleinikov, Erika Franklin Fowler
{"title":"平台趋同还是分歧?比较数字和社交媒体平台上的政治广告内容","authors":"Travis N. Ridout, Markus Neumann, Jielu Yao, Laura M. Baum, Michael M. Franz, P. Oleinikov, Erika Franklin Fowler","doi":"10.1177/08944393241258767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When it comes to the study of the messaging of online political campaigns, theory suggests that platform divergence should be common, but much research finds considerable convergence across platforms. In this research, we examine variation across digital and social media platforms in the types of paid campaign messages that are distributed, focusing on their goals, tone, and the partisanship of political rhetoric. We use data on the content of paid election advertisements placed on YouTube, Google search, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2020 elections in the United States, examining all federal candidates who advertised on these platforms during the final 2 months of the campaign. We find that YouTube is most distinct from the other platforms, perhaps because it most resembles television, but convergence better describes the two Meta platforms, Facebook and Instagram.","PeriodicalId":506768,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Computer Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platform Convergence or Divergence? Comparing Political Ad Content Across Digital and Social Media Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Travis N. Ridout, Markus Neumann, Jielu Yao, Laura M. Baum, Michael M. Franz, P. Oleinikov, Erika Franklin Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08944393241258767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When it comes to the study of the messaging of online political campaigns, theory suggests that platform divergence should be common, but much research finds considerable convergence across platforms. In this research, we examine variation across digital and social media platforms in the types of paid campaign messages that are distributed, focusing on their goals, tone, and the partisanship of political rhetoric. We use data on the content of paid election advertisements placed on YouTube, Google search, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2020 elections in the United States, examining all federal candidates who advertised on these platforms during the final 2 months of the campaign. We find that YouTube is most distinct from the other platforms, perhaps because it most resembles television, but convergence better describes the two Meta platforms, Facebook and Instagram.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science Computer Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science Computer Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241258767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Computer Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241258767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在研究网络政治活动的信息传播时,理论上认为平台间的分歧应该是很常见的,但很多研究发现平台间存在相当大的趋同性。在本研究中,我们研究了数字和社交媒体平台上发布的付费竞选信息类型的差异,重点关注其目标、语气和政治修辞的党派性。我们使用了 2020 年美国大选期间在 YouTube、谷歌搜索、Instagram 和 Facebook 上投放的付费竞选广告的内容数据,研究了竞选最后两个月期间在这些平台上投放广告的所有联邦候选人。我们发现,YouTube 与其他平台的区别最大,这或许是因为它最像电视,而 Facebook 和 Instagram 这两个 Meta 平台则更适合描述其趋同性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Platform Convergence or Divergence? Comparing Political Ad Content Across Digital and Social Media Platforms
When it comes to the study of the messaging of online political campaigns, theory suggests that platform divergence should be common, but much research finds considerable convergence across platforms. In this research, we examine variation across digital and social media platforms in the types of paid campaign messages that are distributed, focusing on their goals, tone, and the partisanship of political rhetoric. We use data on the content of paid election advertisements placed on YouTube, Google search, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2020 elections in the United States, examining all federal candidates who advertised on these platforms during the final 2 months of the campaign. We find that YouTube is most distinct from the other platforms, perhaps because it most resembles television, but convergence better describes the two Meta platforms, Facebook and Instagram.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Digital Political Communication: Comparisons Across Countries, Platforms, and Time Platform Convergence or Divergence? Comparing Political Ad Content Across Digital and Social Media Platforms Leveraging Open Large Language Models for Multilingual Policy Topic Classification: The Babel Machine Approach The Dark Sides of AI Advertising: The Integration of Cognitive Appraisal Theory and Information Quality Theory The Re-mediation of Legacy and New Media on Twitter: A Six-Language Comparison of the European Social Media Discourse on Migration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1