A. Golash, S. Bera, Aditya V. Kanoi, S. Hanspal, Abhijit Golash
{"title":"用 IJV 进行端侧静脉吻合:改善头颈部重建中微血管吻合的效果","authors":"A. Golash, S. Bera, Aditya V. Kanoi, S. Hanspal, Abhijit Golash","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background End-to-side (ES) venous anastomosis is an established approach for head and neck reconstruction and has several benefits over conventional end-to-end (EE) anastomosis. However, this is not preferred by all, which may be due to technical preferences for an EE anastomosis by many surgeons. We present here our experience of routine ES venous anastomosis for head and neck reconstruction over the past 8 years. Materials and Methods All consecutive head and neck malignancy patients reconstructed with free flap and our routine ES internal jugular vein (IJV) anastomosis approach between 2015 and 2023 have been included in this study. Flap-related variables are reviewed retrospectively. Results Reconstruction was done with a total of 585 free flaps including 303 radial forearm flaps (RFFs), 143 osteocutaneous fibula flaps (OCFFs), and 139 anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps. The flap survival rate was 573/585 (97.95%). Re-exploration and salvage rates were 45/585 (7.69%) and 38/45, respectively (84.44%). Conclusion Routine use of ES anastomosis simplifies microvascular anastomosis by avoiding efforts related to the selection of recipient vessels, providing a single large-caliber venous outlet, the favorable geometric orientation of the pedicle, and ease of re-exploration. The vascular anastomosis for RFF, ALT, and OCFF flap is feasible with 7–0 sutures and under 4.5X loupe magnification with this approach quite conveniently with similar outcomes to the reported flap survival rate in the contemporary practice.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-to-Side Venous Anastomosis with IJV: Improving Outcomes of Microvascular Anastomosis in Head and Neck Reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"A. Golash, S. Bera, Aditya V. Kanoi, S. Hanspal, Abhijit Golash\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background End-to-side (ES) venous anastomosis is an established approach for head and neck reconstruction and has several benefits over conventional end-to-end (EE) anastomosis. However, this is not preferred by all, which may be due to technical preferences for an EE anastomosis by many surgeons. We present here our experience of routine ES venous anastomosis for head and neck reconstruction over the past 8 years. Materials and Methods All consecutive head and neck malignancy patients reconstructed with free flap and our routine ES internal jugular vein (IJV) anastomosis approach between 2015 and 2023 have been included in this study. Flap-related variables are reviewed retrospectively. Results Reconstruction was done with a total of 585 free flaps including 303 radial forearm flaps (RFFs), 143 osteocutaneous fibula flaps (OCFFs), and 139 anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps. The flap survival rate was 573/585 (97.95%). Re-exploration and salvage rates were 45/585 (7.69%) and 38/45, respectively (84.44%). Conclusion Routine use of ES anastomosis simplifies microvascular anastomosis by avoiding efforts related to the selection of recipient vessels, providing a single large-caliber venous outlet, the favorable geometric orientation of the pedicle, and ease of re-exploration. The vascular anastomosis for RFF, ALT, and OCFF flap is feasible with 7–0 sutures and under 4.5X loupe magnification with this approach quite conveniently with similar outcomes to the reported flap survival rate in the contemporary practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 背景 端对侧(ES)静脉吻合术是头颈部重建的一种成熟方法,与传统的端对端(EE)吻合术相比有很多优点。然而,并非所有人都喜欢采用这种方法,这可能是由于许多外科医生在技术上偏好采用 EE 吻合术。我们在此介绍过去 8 年来头颈部重建中常规 ES 静脉吻合术的经验。材料与方法 本研究纳入了 2015 年至 2023 年间所有使用游离皮瓣和我们的常规 ES 颈内静脉(IJV)吻合术重建的连续头颈部恶性肿瘤患者。对皮瓣相关变量进行了回顾性分析。结果 共有585个游离皮瓣进行了重建,包括303个桡侧前臂皮瓣(RFF)、143个骨皮腓骨皮瓣(OCFF)和139个大腿前外侧皮瓣(ALT)。皮瓣存活率为573/585(97.95%)。再次切除率和挽救率分别为 45/585(7.69%)和 38/45(84.44%)。结论 ES吻合术的常规使用简化了微血管吻合术,因为它避免了选择受体血管的相关工作,提供了单一的大口径静脉出口、良好的血管蒂几何方向以及易于再次探查。RFF、ALT 和 OCFF 皮瓣的血管吻合可使用 7-0 缝线,在 4.5 倍放大镜下进行,这种方法非常方便,其结果与当代实践中报道的皮瓣存活率相似。
End-to-Side Venous Anastomosis with IJV: Improving Outcomes of Microvascular Anastomosis in Head and Neck Reconstruction
Abstract Background End-to-side (ES) venous anastomosis is an established approach for head and neck reconstruction and has several benefits over conventional end-to-end (EE) anastomosis. However, this is not preferred by all, which may be due to technical preferences for an EE anastomosis by many surgeons. We present here our experience of routine ES venous anastomosis for head and neck reconstruction over the past 8 years. Materials and Methods All consecutive head and neck malignancy patients reconstructed with free flap and our routine ES internal jugular vein (IJV) anastomosis approach between 2015 and 2023 have been included in this study. Flap-related variables are reviewed retrospectively. Results Reconstruction was done with a total of 585 free flaps including 303 radial forearm flaps (RFFs), 143 osteocutaneous fibula flaps (OCFFs), and 139 anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps. The flap survival rate was 573/585 (97.95%). Re-exploration and salvage rates were 45/585 (7.69%) and 38/45, respectively (84.44%). Conclusion Routine use of ES anastomosis simplifies microvascular anastomosis by avoiding efforts related to the selection of recipient vessels, providing a single large-caliber venous outlet, the favorable geometric orientation of the pedicle, and ease of re-exploration. The vascular anastomosis for RFF, ALT, and OCFF flap is feasible with 7–0 sutures and under 4.5X loupe magnification with this approach quite conveniently with similar outcomes to the reported flap survival rate in the contemporary practice.