全科医生和牙髓病学家在牙髓再治疗方面的实践和知识比较:一项调查

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOLOGY Advances in Human Biology Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.4103/aihb.aihb_35_24
Chandra Prabha, Chitharanjan Shetty, Gurmeen Kaur, S. Saji, Sunheri Bajpe, Rashi Shroff
{"title":"全科医生和牙髓病学家在牙髓再治疗方面的实践和知识比较:一项调查","authors":"Chandra Prabha, Chitharanjan Shetty, Gurmeen Kaur, S. Saji, Sunheri Bajpe, Rashi Shroff","doi":"10.4103/aihb.aihb_35_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Endodontic retreatment differs from initial root canal treatment. Various factors govern the success of root canal treatment, and failure to achieve any of these may lead to the failure of the therapy. Retreatment decisions differ amongst general practitioners and specialists and are dependent on several factors including educational background, work experience, knowledge and economic resources. A survey was conducted to compare the practice and knowledge regarding endodontic retreatment cases amongst general practitioners and endodontists.\n \n \n \n A questionnaire was constructed with questions based on common practice and knowledge of endodontic retreatment and was distributed to general practitioners and endodontists through electronic means and personal mail. Data were analysed using the Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n \n \n \n The results showed that there was no statistical difference in the responses by general dentists and specialists (endodontists).\n \n \n \n Within the limitations of this survey, it can be concluded that both the general practitioners and specialists (endodontists) have adequate knowledge and follow similar protocols when treating retreatment cases with minor differences in their approach.\n","PeriodicalId":7341,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Human Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Practice and Knowledge on Endodontic Retreatment amongst the General Practitioners and Endodontists: A Survey\",\"authors\":\"Chandra Prabha, Chitharanjan Shetty, Gurmeen Kaur, S. Saji, Sunheri Bajpe, Rashi Shroff\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aihb.aihb_35_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Endodontic retreatment differs from initial root canal treatment. Various factors govern the success of root canal treatment, and failure to achieve any of these may lead to the failure of the therapy. Retreatment decisions differ amongst general practitioners and specialists and are dependent on several factors including educational background, work experience, knowledge and economic resources. A survey was conducted to compare the practice and knowledge regarding endodontic retreatment cases amongst general practitioners and endodontists.\\n \\n \\n \\n A questionnaire was constructed with questions based on common practice and knowledge of endodontic retreatment and was distributed to general practitioners and endodontists through electronic means and personal mail. Data were analysed using the Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\\n \\n \\n \\n The results showed that there was no statistical difference in the responses by general dentists and specialists (endodontists).\\n \\n \\n \\n Within the limitations of this survey, it can be concluded that both the general practitioners and specialists (endodontists) have adequate knowledge and follow similar protocols when treating retreatment cases with minor differences in their approach.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":7341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Human Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Human Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_35_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_35_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牙髓再治疗不同于最初的根管治疗。根管治疗的成功与否取决于多种因素,任何一个因素的失败都可能导致治疗的失败。全科医生和专科医生的再治疗决定各不相同,并取决于多种因素,包括教育背景、工作经验、知识和经济资源。为了比较全科医生和牙髓病学家在牙髓再治疗病例方面的实践和知识,我们进行了一项调查。 调查问卷以牙髓再治疗的常见做法和知识为基础,通过电子方式和个人邮件分发给全科医生和牙髓病学家。数据采用卡方检验进行分析。P<0.05为有统计学意义。 结果显示,普通牙科医生和专科医生(牙髓病学家)的回答在统计上没有差异。 在本次调查的局限性范围内,可以得出这样的结论:普通牙科医生和专科医生(牙髓病学家)在治疗再治疗病例时都有足够的知识并遵循相似的方案,只是在方法上略有不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Practice and Knowledge on Endodontic Retreatment amongst the General Practitioners and Endodontists: A Survey
Endodontic retreatment differs from initial root canal treatment. Various factors govern the success of root canal treatment, and failure to achieve any of these may lead to the failure of the therapy. Retreatment decisions differ amongst general practitioners and specialists and are dependent on several factors including educational background, work experience, knowledge and economic resources. A survey was conducted to compare the practice and knowledge regarding endodontic retreatment cases amongst general practitioners and endodontists. A questionnaire was constructed with questions based on common practice and knowledge of endodontic retreatment and was distributed to general practitioners and endodontists through electronic means and personal mail. Data were analysed using the Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results showed that there was no statistical difference in the responses by general dentists and specialists (endodontists). Within the limitations of this survey, it can be concluded that both the general practitioners and specialists (endodontists) have adequate knowledge and follow similar protocols when treating retreatment cases with minor differences in their approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Pazopanib on Primary Patient-derived Undifferentiated Malignant Round Cell Sarcoma Line Comparison of Practice and Knowledge on Endodontic Retreatment amongst the General Practitioners and Endodontists: A Survey The Pinhole Surgical Technique - A Distinct Approach for a Marginal Tissue Recession Coverage Using Amniotic Membrane Dental Erosive Wear Assessment amongst Different Age Groups Utilising Basic Erosive Wear Examination: An Epidemiological Study Assessment of Kinematic and Dynamic Characteristics of Shoulder Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1