Y. Chen, Bingxin Li, Tong Yang, Yanfang Liu, Feng Du
{"title":"反馈类型对年轻用户和老年用户触摸屏导航的影响","authors":"Y. Chen, Bingxin Li, Tong Yang, Yanfang Liu, Feng Du","doi":"10.1093/iwc/iwae021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study investigates how feedback from different modalities affect window navigation tasks performed on a touchscreen by younger and older users. Thirty-two younger and 32 older users moved a window toward one of four or eight target areas with no feedback or visual, tactile or visual–tactile feedback. Visual feedback produced significantly higher accuracy and shorter task completion times than tactile feedback. Generally, visual–tactile feedback did not produce statistically higher accuracy or shorter task completion time than visual feedback. However, visual–tactile feedback prevented both younger and older users from overshooting the windows. Additionally, when users attempted to move the window to one of the eight target areas, the visual–tactile feedback helped younger users perform better. According to theories about human processing, the reason for the subtle advantage of visual–tactile feedback is that the unintuitive tactile force induces a higher cognitive load than straightforward visual information during window navigation. Nevertheless, visual–tactile feedback elicited the best user experience, as measured by questionnaires on emotion and fatigue, gesture usability and preference. Furthermore, more older users prefer visual–tactile feedback than younger users. Therefore, visual–tactile feedback should be considered, and the tactile feedback should be modified to be more intuitive in window navigation tasks.\n Research Highlights Visual feedback improved task performance more than tactile feedback in window navigation task. Visual–tactile feedback did not improve task performance compared to visual feedback. Visual–tactile feedback prevented users from overshooting the window. More older users than younger users prefer visual–tactile feedback.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" 746","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Feedback Type on Touchscreen Navigation for Younger and Older Users\",\"authors\":\"Y. Chen, Bingxin Li, Tong Yang, Yanfang Liu, Feng Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/iwc/iwae021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study investigates how feedback from different modalities affect window navigation tasks performed on a touchscreen by younger and older users. Thirty-two younger and 32 older users moved a window toward one of four or eight target areas with no feedback or visual, tactile or visual–tactile feedback. Visual feedback produced significantly higher accuracy and shorter task completion times than tactile feedback. Generally, visual–tactile feedback did not produce statistically higher accuracy or shorter task completion time than visual feedback. However, visual–tactile feedback prevented both younger and older users from overshooting the windows. Additionally, when users attempted to move the window to one of the eight target areas, the visual–tactile feedback helped younger users perform better. According to theories about human processing, the reason for the subtle advantage of visual–tactile feedback is that the unintuitive tactile force induces a higher cognitive load than straightforward visual information during window navigation. Nevertheless, visual–tactile feedback elicited the best user experience, as measured by questionnaires on emotion and fatigue, gesture usability and preference. Furthermore, more older users prefer visual–tactile feedback than younger users. Therefore, visual–tactile feedback should be considered, and the tactile feedback should be modified to be more intuitive in window navigation tasks.\\n Research Highlights Visual feedback improved task performance more than tactile feedback in window navigation task. Visual–tactile feedback did not improve task performance compared to visual feedback. Visual–tactile feedback prevented users from overshooting the window. More older users than younger users prefer visual–tactile feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" 746\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae021\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Feedback Type on Touchscreen Navigation for Younger and Older Users
This study investigates how feedback from different modalities affect window navigation tasks performed on a touchscreen by younger and older users. Thirty-two younger and 32 older users moved a window toward one of four or eight target areas with no feedback or visual, tactile or visual–tactile feedback. Visual feedback produced significantly higher accuracy and shorter task completion times than tactile feedback. Generally, visual–tactile feedback did not produce statistically higher accuracy or shorter task completion time than visual feedback. However, visual–tactile feedback prevented both younger and older users from overshooting the windows. Additionally, when users attempted to move the window to one of the eight target areas, the visual–tactile feedback helped younger users perform better. According to theories about human processing, the reason for the subtle advantage of visual–tactile feedback is that the unintuitive tactile force induces a higher cognitive load than straightforward visual information during window navigation. Nevertheless, visual–tactile feedback elicited the best user experience, as measured by questionnaires on emotion and fatigue, gesture usability and preference. Furthermore, more older users prefer visual–tactile feedback than younger users. Therefore, visual–tactile feedback should be considered, and the tactile feedback should be modified to be more intuitive in window navigation tasks.
Research Highlights Visual feedback improved task performance more than tactile feedback in window navigation task. Visual–tactile feedback did not improve task performance compared to visual feedback. Visual–tactile feedback prevented users from overshooting the window. More older users than younger users prefer visual–tactile feedback.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.