利用真实使用数据理解移动应用使用行为的统一理论模型

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Development Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1177/02666669241257191
Nurullah Tas, Farid Huseynov, B. Kose
{"title":"利用真实使用数据理解移动应用使用行为的统一理论模型","authors":"Nurullah Tas, Farid Huseynov, B. Kose","doi":"10.1177/02666669241257191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological advancements have added numerous features to smartphones, enhancing our daily lives through various apps. But with so many apps out there, picking the right one can be tough. Plus, developing an app requires a lot of money and time, risking losses if it doesn't attract users. This study looks into how users are influenced by others’ opinions and experiences when choosing and sticking with an app. Three theories–Social Impact Theory (SIT), Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM), and Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2)–are combined to explain the process from download to continued use. Real mobile app usage data was analyzed. Results from 912 surveys and 87 real usage records show that people are swayed by download numbers, star ratings, and user satisfaction. The number of sources, immediacy, and power affect social impact. Social impact, hedonic motivation, facilitating conditions, price, habit, and confirmation also influence continued use intention. On average, people spend 2197 s daily on smartphones. Tools & Productivity is the most popular category, with an average of 29 apps used daily. These apps have 100M + downloads on average and a 4-star rating. The findings offer valuable insights for developers and marketers on what makes an app preferable and actively used among many choices.","PeriodicalId":47137,"journal":{"name":"Information Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A unified theoretical model for understanding mobile application usage behavior supported with real usage data\",\"authors\":\"Nurullah Tas, Farid Huseynov, B. Kose\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02666669241257191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technological advancements have added numerous features to smartphones, enhancing our daily lives through various apps. But with so many apps out there, picking the right one can be tough. Plus, developing an app requires a lot of money and time, risking losses if it doesn't attract users. This study looks into how users are influenced by others’ opinions and experiences when choosing and sticking with an app. Three theories–Social Impact Theory (SIT), Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM), and Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2)–are combined to explain the process from download to continued use. Real mobile app usage data was analyzed. Results from 912 surveys and 87 real usage records show that people are swayed by download numbers, star ratings, and user satisfaction. The number of sources, immediacy, and power affect social impact. Social impact, hedonic motivation, facilitating conditions, price, habit, and confirmation also influence continued use intention. On average, people spend 2197 s daily on smartphones. Tools & Productivity is the most popular category, with an average of 29 apps used daily. These apps have 100M + downloads on average and a 4-star rating. The findings offer valuable insights for developers and marketers on what makes an app preferable and actively used among many choices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241257191\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241257191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术进步为智能手机增添了众多功能,通过各种应用程序改善了我们的日常生活。但是,面对如此众多的应用程序,挑选一款合适的应用程序可能很困难。此外,开发一款应用程序需要大量的资金和时间,如果不能吸引用户,就有可能造成损失。本研究探讨了用户在选择和坚持使用一款应用程序时如何受到他人意见和经验的影响。三种理论--社会影响理论(SIT)、期望-确认模型(ECM)和技术接受和使用扩展统一理论(UTAUT2)--被结合起来解释从下载到持续使用的过程。对真实的移动应用程序使用数据进行了分析。来自 912 项调查和 87 项真实使用记录的结果显示,人们会被下载次数、星级评价和用户满意度所左右。来源的数量、即时性和威力会影响社会影响力。社会影响、享乐动机、便利条件、价格、习惯和确认也会影响继续使用的意愿。人们平均每天在智能手机上花费 2197 秒。工具和生产力是最受欢迎的类别,平均每天使用 29 个应用程序。这些应用程序的平均下载量超过 1 亿次,并获得了 4 星评级。这些发现为开发人员和营销人员提供了宝贵的见解,让他们了解在众多选择中,是什么使应用程序受到青睐并得到积极使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A unified theoretical model for understanding mobile application usage behavior supported with real usage data
Technological advancements have added numerous features to smartphones, enhancing our daily lives through various apps. But with so many apps out there, picking the right one can be tough. Plus, developing an app requires a lot of money and time, risking losses if it doesn't attract users. This study looks into how users are influenced by others’ opinions and experiences when choosing and sticking with an app. Three theories–Social Impact Theory (SIT), Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM), and Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2)–are combined to explain the process from download to continued use. Real mobile app usage data was analyzed. Results from 912 surveys and 87 real usage records show that people are swayed by download numbers, star ratings, and user satisfaction. The number of sources, immediacy, and power affect social impact. Social impact, hedonic motivation, facilitating conditions, price, habit, and confirmation also influence continued use intention. On average, people spend 2197 s daily on smartphones. Tools & Productivity is the most popular category, with an average of 29 apps used daily. These apps have 100M + downloads on average and a 4-star rating. The findings offer valuable insights for developers and marketers on what makes an app preferable and actively used among many choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Development
Information Development INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Information Development is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide authoritative coverage of current developments in the provision, management and use of information throughout the world, with particular emphasis on the information needs and problems of developing countries. It deals with both the development of information systems, services and skills, and the role of information in personal and national development.
期刊最新文献
Awareness, knowledge, and attitude towards artificial intelligence: Perspective of medical students in Ghana Implementing national performance indicator ontology: A case study of Botswana's development agendas Using an extended technology acceptance model to understand the behavioral adoption intention of mobile commerce among Chinese consumers Core problems in information systems implementation: An analytical review and implications for AI systems Integrating information ethics into library and information science curriculum at a public university in Malawi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1