冠状动脉疾病和冠状动脉异位患者的硝酸盐诱发头痛反应:一项回顾性病例对照研究

IF 1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart and Mind Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.4103/hm.hm-d-23-00049
E. Aksu, B. Çuğlan, Selcuk Ozturk, Ali Eren, K. Yalta, H. Turhan, Hasan Atmaca, E. Yetkın
{"title":"冠状动脉疾病和冠状动脉异位患者的硝酸盐诱发头痛反应:一项回顾性病例对照研究","authors":"E. Aksu, B. Çuğlan, Selcuk Ozturk, Ali Eren, K. Yalta, H. Turhan, Hasan Atmaca, E. Yetkın","doi":"10.4103/hm.hm-d-23-00049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Coronary artery ectasia (CAE), while being considered a variant of atherosclerosis, harbors distinct features that significantly differ from atherosclerosis in terms of pathophysiological mechanisms. On the other hand, headache appears to be the most common side effect of nitrates that have been used traditionally for decades. In this context, we aimed to compare the frequency and temporal characteristics of nitrate-induced headache (NIH) between subjects with sole coronary artery disease (CAD) and subjects with CAD and coexisting CAE.\n \n \n \n Two hundred and forty-four patients who had undergone coronary angiogram (CAG) and received a single dose of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate during the procedure comprised in this retrospective study population. CAG is performed in the indications due to guidelines. All patients who had undergone CAG were held under close supervision, at least, for 6 h following CAG (and administration of sublingual nitrate); duration and emergence time of NIH were recorded for all patients. Of these 244 patients, 225 patients having sole CAD were assigned to Group I, whereas 19 patients having both CAD and CAE were assigned to Group II.\n \n \n \n NIH was observed in 19 out of 225 patients (8%) with sole CAD and in 9 out of 19 patients (56%) with CAD and CAE (P = 0.003). The mean interval between the administration of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate and NIH onset was significantly lower in Group II in comparison to Group I (44 ± 14 min vs. 87 ± 63 min, respectively, P = 0.018). However, the duration of NIH was comparable between the two groups (Group I: 203 ± 53 min vs. Group II: 173 ± 61 min, P = 0.24); logistic regression analysis revealed an independent association between NIH and CAE (odds ratio: 11.5, 95% confidential interval: 3.9–33.8, P < 0.001).\n \n \n \n We have demonstrated that sublingual nitrates might induce NIH more frequently in subjects with CAE and CAD in comparison to those with sole CAD. Furthermore, NIH has been demonstrated to be independently associated with CAE.\n","PeriodicalId":34653,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Mind","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrate-Induced Headache Response in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Ectasia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study\",\"authors\":\"E. Aksu, B. Çuğlan, Selcuk Ozturk, Ali Eren, K. Yalta, H. Turhan, Hasan Atmaca, E. Yetkın\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/hm.hm-d-23-00049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Coronary artery ectasia (CAE), while being considered a variant of atherosclerosis, harbors distinct features that significantly differ from atherosclerosis in terms of pathophysiological mechanisms. On the other hand, headache appears to be the most common side effect of nitrates that have been used traditionally for decades. In this context, we aimed to compare the frequency and temporal characteristics of nitrate-induced headache (NIH) between subjects with sole coronary artery disease (CAD) and subjects with CAD and coexisting CAE.\\n \\n \\n \\n Two hundred and forty-four patients who had undergone coronary angiogram (CAG) and received a single dose of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate during the procedure comprised in this retrospective study population. CAG is performed in the indications due to guidelines. All patients who had undergone CAG were held under close supervision, at least, for 6 h following CAG (and administration of sublingual nitrate); duration and emergence time of NIH were recorded for all patients. Of these 244 patients, 225 patients having sole CAD were assigned to Group I, whereas 19 patients having both CAD and CAE were assigned to Group II.\\n \\n \\n \\n NIH was observed in 19 out of 225 patients (8%) with sole CAD and in 9 out of 19 patients (56%) with CAD and CAE (P = 0.003). The mean interval between the administration of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate and NIH onset was significantly lower in Group II in comparison to Group I (44 ± 14 min vs. 87 ± 63 min, respectively, P = 0.018). However, the duration of NIH was comparable between the two groups (Group I: 203 ± 53 min vs. Group II: 173 ± 61 min, P = 0.24); logistic regression analysis revealed an independent association between NIH and CAE (odds ratio: 11.5, 95% confidential interval: 3.9–33.8, P < 0.001).\\n \\n \\n \\n We have demonstrated that sublingual nitrates might induce NIH more frequently in subjects with CAE and CAD in comparison to those with sole CAD. Furthermore, NIH has been demonstrated to be independently associated with CAE.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":34653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart and Mind\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart and Mind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/hm.hm-d-23-00049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/hm.hm-d-23-00049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冠状动脉异位症(CAE)虽然被认为是动脉粥样硬化的一种变异,但其病理生理机制与动脉粥样硬化有着明显的不同。另一方面,头痛似乎是硝酸盐类药物最常见的副作用,而硝酸盐类药物在传统上已经使用了几十年。在这种情况下,我们旨在比较仅患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的受试者与患有冠状动脉疾病并合并 CAE 的受试者之间硝酸盐诱发头痛(NIH)的频率和时间特征。 244 名患者接受了冠状动脉造影术(CAG),并在手术过程中接受了单剂量二硝酸异山梨酯舌下含服,这些患者构成了这项回顾性研究的研究对象。冠状动脉造影术是根据指南规定的适应症进行的。所有接受过 CAG 的患者在 CAG(和硝酸异山梨酯舌下含服)后至少有 6 小时处于严密监护之下;所有患者的 NIH 持续时间和出现时间均有记录。在这 244 名患者中,225 名仅患有 CAD 的患者被分配到第一组,19 名同时患有 CAD 和 CAE 的患者被分配到第二组。 在 225 例仅有 CAD 的患者中,有 19 例(8%)观察到 NIH;在 19 例有 CAD 和 CAE 的患者中,有 9 例(56%)观察到 NIH(P = 0.003)。与第一组相比,第二组患者从舌下含服二硝酸异山梨酯到出现 NIH 的平均间隔时间明显缩短(分别为 44 ± 14 分钟对 87 ± 63 分钟,P = 0.018)。然而,两组的 NIH 持续时间相当(第一组:203 ± 53 分钟 vs. 第二组:173 ± 61 分钟,P = 0.24);逻辑回归分析显示 NIH 与 CAE 之间存在独立关联(几率比:11.5,95% 置信区间:3.9-33.8,P < 0.001)。 我们已经证明,与仅患有 CAD 的受试者相比,舌下含服硝酸盐可能会更频繁地诱发 CAE 和 CAD 受试者的 NIH。此外,NIH 还被证明与 CAE 独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nitrate-Induced Headache Response in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Ectasia: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
Coronary artery ectasia (CAE), while being considered a variant of atherosclerosis, harbors distinct features that significantly differ from atherosclerosis in terms of pathophysiological mechanisms. On the other hand, headache appears to be the most common side effect of nitrates that have been used traditionally for decades. In this context, we aimed to compare the frequency and temporal characteristics of nitrate-induced headache (NIH) between subjects with sole coronary artery disease (CAD) and subjects with CAD and coexisting CAE. Two hundred and forty-four patients who had undergone coronary angiogram (CAG) and received a single dose of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate during the procedure comprised in this retrospective study population. CAG is performed in the indications due to guidelines. All patients who had undergone CAG were held under close supervision, at least, for 6 h following CAG (and administration of sublingual nitrate); duration and emergence time of NIH were recorded for all patients. Of these 244 patients, 225 patients having sole CAD were assigned to Group I, whereas 19 patients having both CAD and CAE were assigned to Group II. NIH was observed in 19 out of 225 patients (8%) with sole CAD and in 9 out of 19 patients (56%) with CAD and CAE (P = 0.003). The mean interval between the administration of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate and NIH onset was significantly lower in Group II in comparison to Group I (44 ± 14 min vs. 87 ± 63 min, respectively, P = 0.018). However, the duration of NIH was comparable between the two groups (Group I: 203 ± 53 min vs. Group II: 173 ± 61 min, P = 0.24); logistic regression analysis revealed an independent association between NIH and CAE (odds ratio: 11.5, 95% confidential interval: 3.9–33.8, P < 0.001). We have demonstrated that sublingual nitrates might induce NIH more frequently in subjects with CAE and CAD in comparison to those with sole CAD. Furthermore, NIH has been demonstrated to be independently associated with CAE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Depression and Adverse Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: Cause or Consequence? New Insights and Clinical Practice on Heart, Brain, and Mind Enhancing Palliative Care for Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Scoping Review with Clinical Insights on the Integration of Physical Activity Adherent Right Atrial Cardiac Lipoma with Obstructive Symptoms: An Unusual Case Report Is Self-Reported Obstructive Sleep Apnea Associated with Cardiac Distress? A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1