错误信息有什么问题?作为一种社会技术和解决问题的实践的事实核查

IF 2.8 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journalism Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1080/1461670X.2024.2357316
Oscar Westlund, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Lucas Graves, Rebekah Larsen, Steen Steensen
{"title":"错误信息有什么问题?作为一种社会技术和解决问题的实践的事实核查","authors":"Oscar Westlund, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Lucas Graves, Rebekah Larsen, Steen Steensen","doi":"10.1080/1461670X.2024.2357316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Misinformation is a complex and global problem of social and technical dimensions. It is a problem that is exacerbated and sought to be solved by using diverse technologies. It is also a problem that flourishes on platforms and can lead to partnerships with platform companies. These sociotechnical dimensions of misinformation as a problem involve different actors. Some actors create or contribute to the problem, while others perceive it as their problem to solve and work to address it. Identifying the problem of misinformation is at the heart of the issue of problem-solving in fact-checking, as different actors have interests in how problems are discursively presented. This article draws on an international interview study conducted throughout 2020–2022 with 46 fact-checking actors (21 fact-checkers, 14 journalists, and 11 newsroom managers). This article analyzes how these actors reflect on “misinformation problems,” and how these problems become “fact-checking problems” for the actors to work with and solve. Ultimately, the article argues that fact-checking must be approached as a sociotechnical and problem-solving-oriented practice. Doing so highlights specific obstacles in information distribution and platform affordances.","PeriodicalId":17541,"journal":{"name":"Journalism Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is the Problem with Misinformation? Fact-checking as a Sociotechnical and Problem-Solving Practice\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Westlund, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon, Lucas Graves, Rebekah Larsen, Steen Steensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1461670X.2024.2357316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Misinformation is a complex and global problem of social and technical dimensions. It is a problem that is exacerbated and sought to be solved by using diverse technologies. It is also a problem that flourishes on platforms and can lead to partnerships with platform companies. These sociotechnical dimensions of misinformation as a problem involve different actors. Some actors create or contribute to the problem, while others perceive it as their problem to solve and work to address it. Identifying the problem of misinformation is at the heart of the issue of problem-solving in fact-checking, as different actors have interests in how problems are discursively presented. This article draws on an international interview study conducted throughout 2020–2022 with 46 fact-checking actors (21 fact-checkers, 14 journalists, and 11 newsroom managers). This article analyzes how these actors reflect on “misinformation problems,” and how these problems become “fact-checking problems” for the actors to work with and solve. Ultimately, the article argues that fact-checking must be approached as a sociotechnical and problem-solving-oriented practice. Doing so highlights specific obstacles in information distribution and platform affordances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2357316\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2357316","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ABSTRACT 错误信息是一个复杂的全球性社会和技术问题。它是一个利用各种技术加剧并寻求解决的问题。它也是一个在平台上蓬勃发展的问题,并可能导致与平台公司的合作。错误信息作为一个问题的这些社会技术层面涉及不同的行为者。一些参与者制造或助长了这一问题,而另一些参与者则将其视为自己需要解决的问题,并努力加以解决。识别错误信息的问题是事实核查中解决问题的核心,因为不同的行为者在如何以话语方式呈现问题方面都有各自的利益。本文借鉴了 2020-2022 年期间对 46 位事实核查参与者(21 位事实核查者、14 位记者和 11 位新闻编辑室管理者)进行的国际访谈研究。文章分析了这些参与者如何反思 "错误信息问题",以及这些问题如何成为 "事实核查问题",供参与者处理和解决。文章最终认为,事实核查必须作为一种社会技术和以解决问题为导向的实践来对待。这样做可以突出信息传播和平台承受能力方面的具体障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Is the Problem with Misinformation? Fact-checking as a Sociotechnical and Problem-Solving Practice
ABSTRACT Misinformation is a complex and global problem of social and technical dimensions. It is a problem that is exacerbated and sought to be solved by using diverse technologies. It is also a problem that flourishes on platforms and can lead to partnerships with platform companies. These sociotechnical dimensions of misinformation as a problem involve different actors. Some actors create or contribute to the problem, while others perceive it as their problem to solve and work to address it. Identifying the problem of misinformation is at the heart of the issue of problem-solving in fact-checking, as different actors have interests in how problems are discursively presented. This article draws on an international interview study conducted throughout 2020–2022 with 46 fact-checking actors (21 fact-checkers, 14 journalists, and 11 newsroom managers). This article analyzes how these actors reflect on “misinformation problems,” and how these problems become “fact-checking problems” for the actors to work with and solve. Ultimately, the article argues that fact-checking must be approached as a sociotechnical and problem-solving-oriented practice. Doing so highlights specific obstacles in information distribution and platform affordances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journalism Studies
Journalism Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Understanding Social Media Journalism The Dynamics of Political Interest and News Media Avoidance: A Generational and Longitudinal Perspective What Is the Problem with Misinformation? Fact-checking as a Sociotechnical and Problem-Solving Practice Framing Policy Reform in Europe. A Comparative Study of Frame Variation Across Countries, Newspapers, and Time Exploring the Relationship Between Stylistic Features and Reactions on Facebook: A Comparative Analysis of Newspaper Headlines and Status Messages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1