母乳和婴儿配方奶粉对卡齐纳市新生儿肠道微生物组的影响比较

Usman, A., Abdulkadir, B., Lawal, B., Isah, M. B.
{"title":"母乳和婴儿配方奶粉对卡齐纳市新生儿肠道微生物组的影响比较","authors":"Usman, A., Abdulkadir, B., Lawal, B., Isah, M. B.","doi":"10.47430/ujmr.2493.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study’s Novelty/ Excerpt\n\nThis study explored the impact of breast milk versus infant formula on the gut microbiota of neonates in Katsina metropolis, revealing significant differences in bacterial composition and fecal pH between the two groups.\nExclusively breastfed infants exhibited a lower fecal pH (5.09±0.1) and higher weights, with similar levels of Escherichia spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., while formula-fed infants showed a higher fecal pH (5.9±0.1) and differences in Escherichia spp. loads. \nDespite advances in infant formula enrichment, the study underscores the distinct influence of breast milk on neonatal gut microbiota composition and health.\n\nFull Abstract\nNumerous studies conducted in recent years have highlighted the intricate nature of the neonatal gut microbiome, influenced by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors. One significant factor in this regard is the type of feeding, which has a substantial impact on the development of intestinal microbiota in early infancy. This study aimed to compare the effects of breast milk and infant formulae on the gut microbiota of newborns in Katsina metropolis. Faecal samples were obtained from 46 neonates (33 exclusively breastfed, 10 formula-fed, and 3 mix-fed) and analyzed using a culture-dependent method. Colony enumerations and pH measurements were conducted for comparison between the groups. The mean weight of the participants was 2.88±0.1 kg, with exclusively breastfed infants (BFI) weighing significantly more (p = 0.03) than formula-fed infants (FFI). The bacteria selected for analysis (Bifidobacterium spp., Staphylococcus spp., Escherichia spp., and Lactobacillus spp.) were present in all feeding groups. Among BFI, similar levels of Escherichia spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. (61.17 CFU/g and 61.38 CFU/g respectively) were observed. Staphylococcus spp. constituted the majority of the bacterial load (32%) in both BFI and FFI groups. Apart from Escherichia spp. (p = 0.01), no significant differences were noted in the levels of all cultured bacteria across the feeding groups. The disparity in Escherichia spp. load was evident between BFI and MFI (p = 0.01), as well as FFI and MFI (p = 0.02) only. There was no overall significant correlation between bacterial load and mode of delivery within the feeding groups (p = 0.6). The average faecal pH of breastfed infants (5.09±01) was significantly lower (p = <0.001) compared to the formula-fed group (5.9±0.1). Despite advancements in enriching infant formulae with probiotics and other bifidogenic substances, subtle differences in fecal bacterial load compared to breast milk persist, highlighting the significant influence of both feeding methods on the composition and functionality of the neonatal gut microbiome","PeriodicalId":23463,"journal":{"name":"UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research (UJMR)","volume":" 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Effect of Breast Milk and Infant Formulae on Neonatal Gut Microbiome within Katsina Metropolis\",\"authors\":\"Usman, A., Abdulkadir, B., Lawal, B., Isah, M. B.\",\"doi\":\"10.47430/ujmr.2493.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Study’s Novelty/ Excerpt\\n\\nThis study explored the impact of breast milk versus infant formula on the gut microbiota of neonates in Katsina metropolis, revealing significant differences in bacterial composition and fecal pH between the two groups.\\nExclusively breastfed infants exhibited a lower fecal pH (5.09±0.1) and higher weights, with similar levels of Escherichia spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., while formula-fed infants showed a higher fecal pH (5.9±0.1) and differences in Escherichia spp. loads. \\nDespite advances in infant formula enrichment, the study underscores the distinct influence of breast milk on neonatal gut microbiota composition and health.\\n\\nFull Abstract\\nNumerous studies conducted in recent years have highlighted the intricate nature of the neonatal gut microbiome, influenced by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors. One significant factor in this regard is the type of feeding, which has a substantial impact on the development of intestinal microbiota in early infancy. This study aimed to compare the effects of breast milk and infant formulae on the gut microbiota of newborns in Katsina metropolis. Faecal samples were obtained from 46 neonates (33 exclusively breastfed, 10 formula-fed, and 3 mix-fed) and analyzed using a culture-dependent method. Colony enumerations and pH measurements were conducted for comparison between the groups. The mean weight of the participants was 2.88±0.1 kg, with exclusively breastfed infants (BFI) weighing significantly more (p = 0.03) than formula-fed infants (FFI). The bacteria selected for analysis (Bifidobacterium spp., Staphylococcus spp., Escherichia spp., and Lactobacillus spp.) were present in all feeding groups. Among BFI, similar levels of Escherichia spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. (61.17 CFU/g and 61.38 CFU/g respectively) were observed. Staphylococcus spp. constituted the majority of the bacterial load (32%) in both BFI and FFI groups. Apart from Escherichia spp. (p = 0.01), no significant differences were noted in the levels of all cultured bacteria across the feeding groups. The disparity in Escherichia spp. load was evident between BFI and MFI (p = 0.01), as well as FFI and MFI (p = 0.02) only. There was no overall significant correlation between bacterial load and mode of delivery within the feeding groups (p = 0.6). The average faecal pH of breastfed infants (5.09±01) was significantly lower (p = <0.001) compared to the formula-fed group (5.9±0.1). Despite advancements in enriching infant formulae with probiotics and other bifidogenic substances, subtle differences in fecal bacterial load compared to breast milk persist, highlighting the significant influence of both feeding methods on the composition and functionality of the neonatal gut microbiome\",\"PeriodicalId\":23463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research (UJMR)\",\"volume\":\" 47\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research (UJMR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47430/ujmr.2493.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UMYU Journal of Microbiology Research (UJMR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47430/ujmr.2493.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的新颖性/摘要本研究探讨了母乳与婴儿配方奶粉对卡齐纳大都市新生儿肠道微生物群的影响,结果显示两组婴儿的细菌组成和粪便 pH 值存在显著差异、而配方奶喂养的婴儿粪便 pH 值较高 (5.9±0.1),埃希氏菌的含量也有差异。尽管婴儿配方奶粉富集技术在不断进步,但这项研究强调了母乳对新生儿肠道微生物群组成和健康的独特影响。其中一个重要因素是喂养类型,它对婴儿早期肠道微生物群的发育有重大影响。本研究旨在比较母乳和婴儿配方奶粉对卡齐纳市新生儿肠道微生物群的影响。研究人员采集了 46 名新生儿(33 名纯母乳喂养、10 名配方奶喂养和 3 名混合喂养)的粪便样本,并采用培养依赖法进行了分析。对菌落计数和 pH 值进行了测量,以便在各组之间进行比较。参与者的平均体重为 2.88±0.1 千克,纯母乳喂养婴儿(BFI)的体重明显高于配方奶喂养婴儿(FFI)(p = 0.03)。所有喂养组中都存在选定用于分析的细菌(双歧杆菌属、葡萄球菌属、大肠杆菌属和乳酸杆菌属)。在 BFI 组中,观察到类似水平的埃希氏菌和双歧杆菌(分别为 61.17 CFU/g 和 61.38 CFU/g)。葡萄球菌占 BFI 组和 FFI 组细菌量的大部分(32%)。除埃希氏菌外(p = 0.01),各饲喂组的所有培养细菌含量均无显著差异。在 BFI 和 MFI(p = 0.01)之间,以及仅在 FFI 和 MFI(p = 0.02)之间,埃希氏菌的数量差异明显。在喂养组中,细菌量与分娩方式之间总体上没有明显的相关性(p = 0.6)。母乳喂养婴儿的平均粪便 pH 值(5.09±01)明显低于配方奶喂养组(5.9±0.1)(p = <0.001)。尽管在婴儿配方奶粉中添加益生菌和其他双歧因子物质的技术不断进步,但与母乳相比,婴儿粪便中的细菌量仍然存在微妙的差异,这突出表明两种喂养方式对新生儿肠道微生物组的组成和功能都有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Effect of Breast Milk and Infant Formulae on Neonatal Gut Microbiome within Katsina Metropolis
Study’s Novelty/ Excerpt This study explored the impact of breast milk versus infant formula on the gut microbiota of neonates in Katsina metropolis, revealing significant differences in bacterial composition and fecal pH between the two groups. Exclusively breastfed infants exhibited a lower fecal pH (5.09±0.1) and higher weights, with similar levels of Escherichia spp. and Bifidobacterium spp., while formula-fed infants showed a higher fecal pH (5.9±0.1) and differences in Escherichia spp. loads. Despite advances in infant formula enrichment, the study underscores the distinct influence of breast milk on neonatal gut microbiota composition and health. Full Abstract Numerous studies conducted in recent years have highlighted the intricate nature of the neonatal gut microbiome, influenced by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors. One significant factor in this regard is the type of feeding, which has a substantial impact on the development of intestinal microbiota in early infancy. This study aimed to compare the effects of breast milk and infant formulae on the gut microbiota of newborns in Katsina metropolis. Faecal samples were obtained from 46 neonates (33 exclusively breastfed, 10 formula-fed, and 3 mix-fed) and analyzed using a culture-dependent method. Colony enumerations and pH measurements were conducted for comparison between the groups. The mean weight of the participants was 2.88±0.1 kg, with exclusively breastfed infants (BFI) weighing significantly more (p = 0.03) than formula-fed infants (FFI). The bacteria selected for analysis (Bifidobacterium spp., Staphylococcus spp., Escherichia spp., and Lactobacillus spp.) were present in all feeding groups. Among BFI, similar levels of Escherichia spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. (61.17 CFU/g and 61.38 CFU/g respectively) were observed. Staphylococcus spp. constituted the majority of the bacterial load (32%) in both BFI and FFI groups. Apart from Escherichia spp. (p = 0.01), no significant differences were noted in the levels of all cultured bacteria across the feeding groups. The disparity in Escherichia spp. load was evident between BFI and MFI (p = 0.01), as well as FFI and MFI (p = 0.02) only. There was no overall significant correlation between bacterial load and mode of delivery within the feeding groups (p = 0.6). The average faecal pH of breastfed infants (5.09±01) was significantly lower (p = <0.001) compared to the formula-fed group (5.9±0.1). Despite advancements in enriching infant formulae with probiotics and other bifidogenic substances, subtle differences in fecal bacterial load compared to breast milk persist, highlighting the significant influence of both feeding methods on the composition and functionality of the neonatal gut microbiome
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular Characterization of Agents of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Dutsin-Ma Local Government Area of Katsina State, Northwestern, Nigeria Bio-Prospecting Xylose-Utilizing, Exopolysaccharide (EPS)-Producing Bacteria and EPS Quantification through Submerged Fermentation using Xylose as the Major Carbon Source Optimization of Growth Response Parameters, Screening and Molecular Detection of Pesticide Degradation Genes in Bacterial Isolates from Agricultural Soils Comparative Effect of Breast Milk and Infant Formulae on Neonatal Gut Microbiome within Katsina Metropolis Occurrence of Antibiotic Resistant Salmonella and Shigella in Diarrheal cases Resulting from a Common Source Consumption of Contaminated Water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1